You will submit the Recommendations and Global Considerations portion of the fin
You will submit the Recommendations and Global Considerations portion of the final project. The purpose of this assignment is to suggest relevant changes to the organization it self and changes to the ethical guidelines that could have prevented the incident.
Prompt
Suggest relevant changes to the organization itself and changes to the ethical guidelines that could have prevented the incident. Standards external to the organization that may have helped prevent the incident should also be proposed. This assignment will also address international compliance standards and how they would have been relevant to the incident. The impact of the incident on global communication and commerce will be analyzed, as well as the impact on the global technology environment.
Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed:
RecommendationsPropose relevant changes to the organization that may have prevented the incident. How would these changes have helped to prevent the occurrence?
Propose reasonable ethical guidelines that could have helped prevent the incident and that might help the organization prevent future incidents. Propose changes to the standards external to the organization that might have helped prevent the incident. This can include changes to regulations and regulatory and ethical standards that might exist today but did not exist or were not properly delivered at the time of the incident. Be sure to support your conclusions.
Global ConsiderationsWhat international compliance standards (either at the time of the incident or today) would have been relevant to the incident, and how? If your company is not global, imagine that is.
Analyze the impact of the incident on global communication and commerce (again, if your organization is not global, imagine otherwise). In other words, what impact did (or would) the incident have on views and use of information technology and communication in global contexts?
Global Technology Environment: Based on your research and analysis of this case, determine the global legal and regulatory impacts this case had on the information technology overall. In other words, determine the relationship between this case and the global regulatory standards that are now in place, will be put in place shortly, or should be put in place as a result of this or related incident(s).
What to Submit
The format for this assignment will be a three- to five-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.
Milestone Three Rubric
CriteriaExemplary (100%)Proficient (90%)Needs Improvement (70%)Not Evident (0%)Value
Recommendations: Organizational ChangesMeets “Proficient” criteria and evidences keen insight into solving organizational issuesProposes and defends relevant changes to the organization that would have helped prevent the incidentProposes and defends changes to the organization, but changes are not relevant or not comprehensively defended, or would not have helped prevent the incidentDoes not propose and defend changes to the organization15
Recommendations: Ethical GuidelinesMeets “Proficient” criteria and evidences keen insight into the nuanced ethical standard needs of organizationsProposes reasonable ethical guidelines that could have helped prevent the incident and that might help prevent future incidents within the organizationProposes ethical guidelines, but guidelines are not reasonable or would not have helped prevent the incident or would not prevent future incidents within the organizationDoes not propose ethical guidelines for the organization15
Recommendations: External StandardsMeets “Proficient” criteria and evidences keen insight into the nuanced considerations required when recommending external standards for organizations to followProposes external standards that may have helped prevent the incident, with relevant and logical supportProposes external standards with support, but the standards would not have helped prevent the incident, or the support is not relevant or logical given the caseDoes not propose external standards with support15
Global Considerations: International ComplianceMeets “Proficient” criteria and evidences keen insight into the application of international standardsAccurately identifies and explains in detail the international compliance standards relevant to the incidentIdentifies and explains the international compliance standards relevant to the incident, but with gaps in accuracy or detailDoes not identify and explain the international compliance standards relevant to the incident15
Global Considerations: Cultural ImpactsMeets “Proficient” criteria and evidences keen insight into cultural perspectives toward cyber communication and commerce within a global contextAccurately analyzes the impact of the incident on cyber communication and commerce from the larger cultural perspectiveAnalyzes the impact of the incident on cyber communication and commerce globally but not in terms of the larger cultural perspective or with gaps in accuracyDoes not analyze the impact of the incident on cyber communication and commerce globally15
Global Considerations: Global Technology EnvironmentMeets “Proficient” criteria and evidences a nuanced, in-depth understanding of global legal impacts of related casesAnalyzes in detail the global legal and regulatory impact of this or similar cases to determine global laws and regulations that resulted or should have resultedAnalyzes the global legal and regulatory impact of this or similar cases to determine global laws and regulations that resulted or should have resulted, but with gaps in detailDoes not analyze the global legal and regulatory impact of this or similar cases to determine global laws and regulations that resulted or should have resulted15
Articulation of ResponseSubmission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read formatSubmission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organizationSubmission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideasSubmission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas10
Total: 100%