For each text, provide a commentary that discusses the challenges you enco

For each text, provide a commentary that discusses the challenges you enco

For each text, provide a commentary that discusses the challenges you encountered whilst translating it. Provide examples from your target texts (including back translations into English where relevant) and refer to relevant translation, pragmatics and cross-cultural communication theories.
Do not focus on specific general translation issues related to equivalence (unless relevant for discourse purposes), syntax or grammar, but on the different approaches you needed to bear in mind in order to achieve a target version that complies with the discursive norms of the Target Audience.
Details can be find in the documents uploaded below.

My File 1 is the instructions for the assignment | The Google drive link of the

My File 1 is the instructions for the assignment | The Google drive link of the

My File 1 is the instructions for the assignment | The Google drive link of the lecture notes: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1vkQsAWq2SCcUdGS2nnAYkPj2N1xumF20?usp=sharing | Topic: A comparative study on two verbal fronting languages; the theme:Present a comparison of one language of your choice and one of the following verb doubling con- structions in Cantonese. | Requirements: • You should write around 2000-3000 words. • You should include a list of references of cited works. • In your paper, you must at least include comparisons of the following points: – The syntactic categories of the fronted verbal elements – The morphological form of the fronted verbal elements – The “repair” strategy (what is left behind in the “gap”) – The semantic functions of verbal fronting – Evidence for or against a movement analysis – Restrictions of the target verbal elements (if any) • You should also include points that are not listed above. Please site professional outside sources (as many as you like) in the essay, you must cite your sources, and you must include a full works cited, and Please DO NOT PLAGIARISE others’ works or use any AI to write the work. I am also a university student so I will know it. I will REPORT and CANCEL the project if you violates this|

Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to observe language socialization in

Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to observe language socialization in

Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to observe language socialization in the conversational patterns of either caregivers and children together, or of new members of groups in conversation with senior members, and to analyze these data in light of the information in the articles that we read on language socialization. The observation for this assignment looks very much like the linguistic observation completed for Observation Paper 2.
There are two parts to this assignment.
First: Observe, with care, and in detail. Remember to document, to the best of your ability, what people actually say and how they say it.
Second: Step back from your data, and from your assumptions about what is going on in the conversation, and to apply the course concepts to your data to come to understand better what is going on. The reflection at the end gives you a chance to integrate the two and consider your role as observer and analyzer in the process.
Observations
You will engage in two observation sessions, done in one of two ways (depending on what kind of access you have to real people interacting in real time).
You can either:
Take a notebook and a pen or pencil and find a place where you will be able to watch caregivers and children interacting with one another without being overly intrusive or noticeable (as with Observation Paper 2, dyads are easier; that is to say, one caregiver with one child). Alternatively, you could watch an interaction between a new member of a group with a senior member of that same group, interacting in a setting which relates to the practices of that group (this is harder to do unless you have access to, for example, a job site where new employees are trained, or are a member of a group where you know new members will be, etc). Do not use any recording devices unless you have explicit permission to do so from the people you are observing (if you feel that you wish to record, please talk to me about permissions, etc). For at least three minutes, take notes on everything that you can about one specific interaction (beforehand, be sure to note the setting, approximate ages of interlocutors, relationship between them if you are able to tell, etc); be sure to get as close as you can to quotes of what is being said and how it is said. For the purposes of this assignment, focus on the linguistic data that you observe, rather than on other, non-linguistic information. However, paralinguistic information, such as stance, proximity, eye contact, etc, can be important.
Alternatively, choose pre-recorded interactions of the same type as those described above. The interaction types for this assignment are very specific. Therefore, if you do not have access to caregivers and children, you may use two of the interactions from the videos listed below. (with time stamps for particularly useful sections)
You should have a total of two observations of around three minutes each at minimum; you can use any combination of real-world and/or recorded data.
Please note: You may not be a participant in the interaction that you are observing.
Content and Format:
The notes you take on these dyadic conversations are the data that you will then analyze.
Read and reflect on your notes. As you write your observation paper, use specific examples from your notes and apply the concepts from the course to your data.
Look for any generalizations that occur, particularly with reference to socialization of the child/neophyte to and/or through language:
Did the caregiver/senior group member correct pronunciation or word choice?
Politeness behaviors?
Style or genre choices or refinements?
Explicit or implicit statements of group values?
If looking at caregiver/child interactions, did the caregiver engage in the one-on-one,
direct eye contact, etc, kinds of behaviors described by Ochs and Schieffelin?
Does the senior person socialize the neophyte into ways of taking? What is the
participant structure of each interaction?
Are there examples of child (or neophyte)-raising behaviors?
Are there literacy events? (These are not the only options; refer to the readings for
other potential patterns of behaviors.)
Relate these observations to the articles that we read for this section of the class.
Given our readings, were your findings expected or unexpected? In what ways?
You should end with a brief reflection of your experience of completing this
assignment.
Possible videos to use for data:
Engaging with Babies and Toddlers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSR8PIGLkZYLinks to an external site. (0:30-1:30) Toddler Story Time.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j32h-h27lgALinks to an external site. (1:05-4:03)
How to Be a Dadhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKglBzikP1kLinks to an external site. Teaching my 14 year-old Sister how to Drivehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X93Xz6RqEagLinks to an external site. (1:25-4:00)
Clinical Case Presentation, Young Adult In Patienthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrxpxtpbMt0Links to an external site.(4:15-6:20)
Please click Actionshere for complete instructions and rubric.View Rubric
Observation Paper 3
Observation Paper 3
CriteriaRatingsPts
Descriptions of interactions include complete descriptions of participantsview longer description
/ 4 pts
Analysis of interactions is connected to key concepts and phenomena (politeness, eye contact, child-raising behaviors, values, literacy events, etc.)
view longer description
/ 6 pts
Analysis is thoughtful, clear and concise
view longer description
/ 3 pts
Detailed and complete observation notes of two interactions. Include specific detail of what was said and how.
view longer description
/ 4 pts
Appropriate terminology, grammar, punctuation, spelling, and writing conventions. Sources cited appropriately.
view longer description
/ 3 pts
Total Points: 0

I have a group research project on methodologies in translation. _______________

I have a group research project on methodologies in translation.
_______________

I have a group research project on methodologies in translation.
________________________________________
The project consist of a full research literature review that is separated in 3 parts (Introduction, Body, Conclusion) The introduction is already done as well the introduction inside the text. My part I will be doing is the body with conclusion.
_________________________________________
There’s a outline paper I will provide that we made was a Template 1 with the sources that is going to be used for this paper (Template 2) and the paper is already made and organized so there’s no need for reference page or creating a new paper because the reference page is in the Template 1.
__________________________________________
Just to clarify: the sources is being used for this project is specific and no outside sources is needed. There’s 7 sources located in the Template 1 paper you can pick as many you want to fit the paper (it doesnt need to be all 7)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The project is focused on the impact of machine translation on translation professionals. I will provide the full template/paper. It just needs your work of writing in the sections on the last page.
__________________________________________
Lastly, I will provide Lecture slides and a guide how to make this paper and also i will provide an example/sample of this paper that was done by other students that is helpful for you to see how this paper can be like.
__________________________________________
Again theres no need for outside sources or reference page just citation in the text.
__________________________________________
if you need anything else let me know.

languages tend to vary in how they morpho-syntactically mark non-Agent semantic

languages tend to vary in how they morpho-syntactically mark non-Agent semantic

languages tend to vary in how they morpho-syntactically mark non-Agent semantic roles—in particular, Themes and Experiencers. For this question, let’s focus on just Experiencer arguments.
Look for examples that show how Experiencer arguments are morpho-syntactically encoded. (Hint: think about which type of verbs have Experiencer arguments). Describe what specific morphological (case marking? Agreement on verbs?) and/or syntactic (position in the sentence) features these non-Agent arguments display, and compare them with an example of a “canonical” two-argument sentence—with a transitive verb that has an Agent argument and a Patient/Theme argument. Are any of the morphological features on Experiencer arguments different? Are any of the syntactic features on Experiencer arguments different?
General guidelines:
Write brief, but full, descriptions. That is, I would like you to not simply “respond” to each of my questions above, and be done with it. Rather, connect, and organize, your findings into a coherent, readable explanation of these features in your research language—imagine a short science piece that can be read by another linguist.
You will want to:
Start your description with an opening statement about what your research language does, or does not mark, in relation to these features.
Even if the morpho-syntax your language does NOT mark a certain feature: you need to show good examples that conclusively demonstrate that this feature is NOT marked, AND state exactly why these examples demonstrate that the feature is not marked.
If the morpho-syntax of your language DOES mark a certain feature: present the system (i.e. the set of all values under that category)—if the system is not too large, list all the values. If it is large (say, a language has multiple dozens of noun classifiers, present a number of representative examples. Either way, as you present the system, show good examples, and discuss any key features.
Finally, don’t forget to provide an in-line citation for each example cited from your sources, to show which page it is from.

Ubicación en México (mapa) vCapital vImportancia económica en México vHistoria:

Ubicación en México (mapa) vCapital vImportancia económica en México vHistoria:

Ubicación en México (mapa) vCapital vImportancia económica en México vHistoria: •Origen (Fecha) vPoblación actual del estado y su capital (cantidad) vCaracterísticas ▪¿Hay grupos indígenas? ¿Cuáles? ▪Lenguas habladas ▪Lugares importantes (Puede ser para fines históricos, turísticos, económicos y/o educacionales) ▪Comidas típicas ▪Tradiciones o Festivales ▪Música, arte, danza/baile ▪Actividades deportivas y/o de diversión ▪Problemas sociales ▪Educación

This essay is to compare and contrast the statements and/or implications of two

This essay is to compare and contrast the statements and/or implications of two

This essay is to compare and contrast the statements and/or implications of two texts on one general subject or concept, arguing for the significance of one of your observations about difference
and/or similarity and driving towards revelation about further subjects or concepts than the obvious basis for comparison and contrast. (Here are the two texts that should be used for the essay: 1. (LaSalle, Peter. “When English Departments Were Actually Hip … for Me, Anyway.” The Missouri Review, vol. 46 no. 3, 2023, p. 130-151. Project MUSE, https://doi.org/10.1353/mis.2023.a909063.) 2. (Lee, Hea-Ream. “The Last Good Day.” Ecotone, vol. 18 no. 1, 2022, p. 104-113. Project MUSE, doi:10.1353/ect.2022.0021. Nonfiction/Public access) I want the essay in MLA format including: intext-citations and MLA work cited pages.