Category: Military science

Thoroughly analyze the application of the three general principles of command re

Thoroughly analyze the application of the three general principles of command relationships – command, unity of command, and unity of effort. Then compare and contrast the command authorities of combatant command (COCOM), operational command (OPCON), and tactical control (TACON). Your analysis must include examples of real-world/life events that support your conclusions. Be sure to include a discussion on how sergeants major may use these concepts in the future.
Focus Area Writing Assignment (F-AWA) Topics
-Title: Analyzing Command Relationships
-Paper Body: Topic/intro
-Purpose statement-the purpose of this paper is to…
-Evidence/cite
-Example/Analysis (4 examples)
-Transition from each topic
-content
• Analyze
• Subject
• Example
• SGM use
-No history, it is analytical, define the term and give examples- analyze the application of the three general principles of command relationships – command, unity of command, and unity of effort…
– Then compare and. contrast the command authorities of combatant command (COCOM), operational command (OPCON), and tactical control (TACON). Your analysis must include examples of real-world/life events that support your conclusions.
-Discussion on how sergeants major may use these concepts in the future
-Conclusion: the purpose of this paper was to…
1. This Focused-Area Writing Assignment (F-AWA) window will open at You must complete and upload (Blackboard) your F-AWA ; no exceptions.
Computer problems, personal distractions, etc. are not viable excuses for late or missing papers. Late or missing papers will have points deducted in accordance with the grading rubric.
2. In academic writing, format is as important as content. The format allows you to organize your writing in a logical sequence while promoting clarity. The readings and learning activities in this series introduced you to the concepts and doctrine. For this, and all writing assignments, it is crucial to base your content on research.
a. Required: You must format for your writing assignment in accordance with the American Psychological Association (APA) 7 style. You must write your paper to the appropriate learning level of Bloom’s Taxonomy. You must include a title and reference page. You must present a PURPOSE statement. It must appear in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph. (Ex: “The purpose of this paper is…”). You must include a minimum of one reference with appropriate in text citations. More references may lead to a higher score. You must use proper citations and references throughout the F-AWA to identify borrowed material and avoid plagiarism. You must write your paper in third person and include examples of real-world events or experiences. You must review the rubric to ensure you addressed all your writing requirements. You may use references from your readings or lesson notes as well as any sources you gather from research to answer the focused-area.
Important Note:
Contents – In your conclusion, the first sentence must restate your purpose statement.
`
Research – You must provide a minimum of one credible source to receive a Met Standard; two credible sources to receive an Exceeded Standard, and three or more credible sources to receive a Far Exceeded Standard. The primary military sources for research must reflect Joint Publications.
According to Purdue Owl, an analytical paper breaks down an issue or an idea into its component parts, evaluates the issue or idea, and presents this breakdown and evaluation to the audience.
b. Not required: There is no requirement to write an abstract. There is no requirement to include an outline.
5. You will write a 1,000-word to 2,000-word (not including the cover and reference pages) paper by analyzing the following focused-area presented during this series.
Thoroughly analyze . Your analysis must include examples of real-world/life events that support your conclusions. Be sure to include a discussion of how sergeants major use these concepts in the future.
Use the following references:
1. Joint Publication (JP) 1, Doctrine for the Armed Forces of the United States12.
2. Joint Publication (JP) 3-0, Joint Operations:
3. Joint Publication (JP) 3-33, Joint Task Force Headquarters
4. Joint Publication (JP) 5-0, Joint Planning:
5. Joint Logistics (JP) 4-0, Logistics

In the article, Disruption Is the Key to Delivering the Army of 20XX, the author

In the article, Disruption Is the Key to Delivering the Army of 20XX, the author explains that creativity, cooperation, and collaboration at multiple levels in our Army are the fundamental elements needed to produce formations at echelon capable of winning our next battles and engagements.
In your essay, explain what is needed in our Army to support the creativity role. Give three examples to support your argument (come up with your own). What steps have you taken to support creativity?

Content and Organizational Guidelines: This assignment is designed to evaluate e

Content and Organizational Guidelines:
This assignment is designed to evaluate each student’s ability to conduct an in-depth research project. The paper must address one of the topics outlined in the case study “A Bomb Over Ljubljana.”
The two-step timetable to complete this assignment is the following:
On Sunday that concludes Week 5: Research Paper Argument due.
On Saturday at the end of Week 11: Final Research Paper is due.
Please read the Guidelines for Research Papers in the Grading Guidelines and Rubrics.
Please review the following information on final paper editing.
Listen to the audio and read the transcriipt
Download the audio file (zip file) (Unresolved link)
Format and Style Guidelines:
The general format and style guidelines for the final research paper are as follows:
15-20 pages in length.
Must be written in Times New Roman 12-point font.
Must be double-spaced with a 1.25-inch left margin and 1-inch top, bottom and right margins.
The documentation style utilized must be consistent throughout the paper. Students must choose APA Publication Manual, Chicago Manual of Style or MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers (acceptable); please refer to “A Writer’s Reference” by D. Hacker.
Must include a separate title page and a works cited section.
Refer to the Syllabus for point value of this assignment.

Overview: The purpose of the essay is to provide a vehicle to assess the student

Overview:
The purpose of the essay is to provide a vehicle to assess the student

Overview:
The purpose of the essay is to provide a vehicle to assess the student’s critical thinking, stated lesson educational objectives, and academic writing skills. Answer your selected writing prompt and provide evidence to support your position from the course materials or outside sources. Use original thought and analyze the topic with the knowledge gained in the course and through your life experiences. Ensure to use proper in-text citations when citing a source.
Assignment:
The assignment is to write a 750-1200 word essay answering the questions below. Students must bold their thesis statement in the introduction paragraph of the essay.
Any supporting material used in your essay that is not your own original thought must give credit to the original source. You should do this by citing your sources using both in-text citations and a reference page on a new page following the end of your essay; this helps avoid any accidental plagiarism issues within your essay. Refer to the ECDEP Citation Guidelines (CC661020REQG) for specific citation instruction. Refer to the last page of The ECDEP Essay (CC6610REQD) for a reference page example.
Essay Prompt:
a. What is the connection between the Marine Corps’ institutional values and resilience, and what is the SNCO’s role in developing both?
The CC6715 Essay Rubric provides the grading criteria for this assignment.

• The author places the central point within the top 2% of the document and fron

• The author places the central point within the top 2% of the document and fron

• The author places the central point within the top 2% of the document and frontloads within sections, paragraphs, and bullet points.
• The argument is deeply issue-focused, delving into the heart of the matter, and is supported by a comprehensive analysis of data and primary sources, showcasing the author’s expertise and thorough research.
• Uses active voice primarily; passive voice is used rarely, and logically visible patterns of sentence construction errors.
• All written units (words, sentences, bullet points, or paragraphs)
• Uses standard written English with correct spelling, punctuation, grammar, mechanics, formatting, and citations without visible mistakes.
Let’s Use General Colin Powell as a key leadership example.

Using the attached background information, develop a 1550-1700 word document whe

Using the attached background information, develop a 1550-1700 word document whe

Using the attached background information, develop a 1550-1700 word document where you address each of the following tasks. While discrete, these tasks are part of a continuous process and need to be coherent and continue the logic and rationale presented in previous tasks. Ensure you clearly label each section with the respective task title to indicate your responses to each distinct question. The document should encompass your detailed responses to all the following tasks: COG IDENTIFICATION: Identify the operational-level Center of Gravity (COG) for Caprica. Provide rationale for your selection, then conduct a critical factor analysis (CFA) for the COG you identified. From this CFA, provide one critical capability, two critical requirements, and two critical vulnerabilities, as well as a brief explanation for the derivation of these factors for each COG. (450-550 words).
COA DEVELOPMENT: Develop and describe one Course of Action (COA) that is distinguishable from both the two COAs provided in the Staff Estimate. (150-250 words).
COA VALIDITY: Conduct a doctrinal validity test on the COA you developed and describe your results (400-450 words). Remember the ultimate goal of COA validity is to determine whether COAs are appropriate for presentation to CCDR.
COA COMPARISON: Using the five evaluation criteria provided in paragraph 3 of the Staff Estimate of the Situation, conduct a COA Comparison between the COA you developed and any one of the given COAs. You may use any format you choose (including the sample decision matrix found earlier in this lesson). Explain your methodology and your results (450-550 words).
Use all the attached for references, including JP 3-0 and 5-0, or additional references can be added.