Learning Theories & Principles and Quality Health Care Which learning theories a

Learning Theories & Principles and Quality Health Care
Which learning theories a

Learning Theories & Principles and Quality Health Care
Which learning theories and principles do you think are most useful to the advanced practice nurse (APN) in providing high quality health care to clients, and why?
Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources within 5 years.
All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

The purpose of this assignment is to complete a review of a screening tool utili

The purpose of this assignment is to complete a review of a screening tool utili

The purpose of this assignment is to complete a review of a screening tool utilized by nurse practitioners in maintaining individual, family, or community health.
Your presentation should:
1. Identify and select a screening tool
2. Research of ethical, economical and legal issues relative to the practice in relation to health promotion protocol/practice.
3. Provide recommendations.
Submission Instructions:
Presentation is original work and logically organized in the current APA style including citation of references.
Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the title slide and the reference slide.
The presentation is clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.
Edit
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
Presentation Rubric
Presentation Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
Identification of Main Issues/Problems4 pts
Distinguished
Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.3 pts
Excellent
Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.2 pts
Fair
Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.1 pts
Poor
Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.0 pts
No Submission
/ 4 pts
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms
4 pts
Distinguished
Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.3 pts
Excellent
Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.2 pts
Fair
Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.1 pts
Poor
Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.0 pts
No Submission
/ 4 pts
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding
4 pts
Distinguished
Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.3 pts
Excellent
Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.2 pts
Fair
Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.1 pts
Poor
Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.0 pts
No Submission
/ 4 pts
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature
4 pts
Distinguished
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.3 pts
Excellent
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.2 pts
Fair
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.1 pts
Poor
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.0 pts
No Submission
/ 4 pts
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines
view longer description
4 pts
Distinguished
Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.3 pts
Excellent
Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.2 pts
Fair
Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.1 pts
Poor
Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.0 pts
No Submission
/ 4 pts
Total Points: 0
Choose a submission type
Requirements: 10-15 slides | .ppt file

Please read and implement the writing labs feedback. Original paper rubric and i

Please read and implement the writing labs feedback.
Original paper rubric and i

Please read and implement the writing labs feedback.
Original paper rubric and instructions
In week 1, you completed the below reading and submitted the draft of this paper to the South Writing Center. During Week 2, the Writing Center sent you feedback. You will upload 1) your South Writing Lab Feedback (the one that was emailed to you with track changes) and 2) a final draft of the paper (with all changes made per the Writing Center feedback) to the dropbox so that we can see that you incorporated the recommended changes in your final paper:
Read the attached article, An Analysis and Evaluation of the Theory of Unpleasant SymptomsDownload An Analysis and Evaluation of the Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms
Consider all 19 questions and answer the bolded questions in your paper (#1, #15, #16, #19):
What is the purpose of the theory?
What is the scope of the theory?
What were the origins of the theory?
What are the major concepts?
What are the theoretical propositions?
What are the major assumptions?
What is the context for use?
Are the concepts theoretically and operationally defined? Why or why not?
Are statements defined? Why or why not?
Are linkages explicit? Explain your answer.
Is the theory logically organized? Explain your answer.
Is there a model/diagram? Why or why not?
Are the concepts, statements, and assumptions consistent? Why or why not?
Are outcomes or consequences stated or predicted?
Is the theory congruent with current nursing standards? Nursing interventions?
Has the theory been tested? Is it supported by research? Explain your answer.
Is there evidence that the theory has been used? Is it socially or culturally relevant? Explain your answer.
Does the theory contribute to nursing? What are the implications for nursing related to the implementation of the theory?
How would you use the theory in a research study or in practice?
Requirements
You are required to submit 2 files for this assignment. You will upload:
Your South Writing Lab Feedback (the one that was emailed to you) and
A final draft of the paper (with all changes made per the Writing Center feedback) to the dropbox.
This assignment needs to be submitted following APA format (title page, headings, reference page, etc.). Citations from References that are synthesized from the assigned article, course text, evidence-based and peer-reviewed research articles, and other credible sources are required. A minimum of 3 resources are used. References must be current within 5 years, with the exception of the assigned article from 2017.
This assignment will be submitted below through Canvas and automatically run through TurnItIn. Course faculty monitor for the compliance of citations with Turnitin evaluation of the assignment during the course session.
Please click here for more information on TurnItIn
NOTE: Evidence of plagiarism will result in a score of 0 for this assignment. Repeat offenses of plagiarism will result in more significant repercussions per the South College student handbook.
Evaluation: The following rubric will be used to score this assignment.

The purpose of this assignment is to complete a review of a screening tool utili

The purpose of this assignment is to complete a review of a screening tool utili

The purpose of this assignment is to complete a review of a screening tool utilized by nurse practitioners in maintaining individual, family, or community health.
Your presentation should:
1. Identify and select a screening tool
2. Research of ethical, economical and legal issues relative to the practice in relation to health promotion protocol/practice.
3. Provide recommendations.
Submission Instructions:
Presentation is original work and logically organized in the current APA style including citation of references.
Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the title slide and the reference slide.
The presentation is clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

A 72-year-old male presents to the clinic with 4 weeks of productive cough. He h

A 72-year-old male presents to the clinic with 4 weeks of productive cough. He h

A 72-year-old male presents to the clinic with 4 weeks of productive cough. He has a 10-year history of diagnosed COPD. He has a 45-year history of two packs a day cigarette smoking. He states he quit smoking due to financial needs about 6 years ago. He complains of pain in his chest from coughing, saying it is sore. He has noticed some dark-colored blood on his tissue.
Vital Signs: BP 137/90; HR 82; RR 22; BMI 23.
Chief Complaint: Persistent cough won’t go away with my normal cough medicine. Noticed blood on tissue from coughing.
Discuss the following:
1) What additional subjective information will you be asking of the patient?
2) What additional objective findings would you be examining the patient for?
3) What are the differential diagnoses that you are considering?
4) What radiological examinations or additional diagnostic studies would you order?
5) What treatment and specific information about the prescription will you give this patient?
6) What are the potential complications from the treatment ordered?
7) What additional laboratory tests might you consider ordering?
8) Will you be looking for a consult?
Submission Instructions:
The post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style 7 with support from at least 2 academic sources within last 5 years.

Your paper should include the underlined itemsbelow as section headings. APA 7th

Your paper should include the underlined itemsbelow as section headings.
APA 7th

Your paper should include the underlined itemsbelow as section headings.
APA 7th edition Title page:
* This is a separate page by itself, with the following information centered in the middle of the page: course title, paper title, student’s name, instructor’s name, and date.
Description of Pathology:
* Start the paper on a new page.
* In this section, you will describe the pathology (statistics about it, background information, etc.). Give as much information as you can about it but be sure it is relevant information and not just filler. It should be a comprehensive introductory section of the condition in one to two paragraphs.
Normal anatomy of the major body system affected: In this section, you will describe what is considered normal anatomy for your particular pathophysiology. For example, if you are discussing a disease related to the brain, explain what is normal for the brain from an anatomical standpoint. You should show comprehensive knowledge of the fundamental concepts and communicate information using scientific vocabulary. There should be little to no discussion of the condition itself in this section.
Normal physiology of the major body system affected: In this section, you will be discussing physiology. Keep in mind that when describing physiology, it isn’t enough to merely provide a list of functions of the body system (Ex: Neurons send signals throughout the body), instead, you need to be able to describe how it does it. The how is the physiology. There should be little to no discussion of the condition itself in this section
Mechanism of Pathophysiology: This section is likely going to be the most in-depth and longest section. In this section, you will explain your particular pathophysiology from a scientific standpoint. In the previous two sections, you explained what is considered normal, in this section, you should describe what the pathophysiology is doing that is causing these issues, how the normal anatomy & physiology is affected/different in a person with your condition. You should show a thorough understanding of the anatomical and physiological changes contributing to the disease. Some good keywords to search for when doing your research might be “Pathology of __________”, Pathophysiology of __________.”
Prevention: In this section, you will explain how your pathophysiology could be prevented. This should outline possible prevention protocols, or clearly indicate if none is available based on the current scientific literature.
Treatment: In this section, you will explain how your pathophysiology is commonly treated. Provide possible treatment protocols for the condition based on current scientific literature. Be sure to bring in nursing relevant information and how you might be involved in the treatment of the condition.
Conclusion: Finally you should summarize your findings. All good research papers should include a conclusion where you wrap up and summarize all of the important points made in your paper.
References:
* As with the Title page, this should be a separate page by itself.
* All references should be included in correct and complete APA format.
* All references must be cited appropriately in the paper using APA-style in-text citations.
* A minimum of three reputable sources are required for this assignment.
Requirements for Topic, Length, & Submission
The length requirement for this paper is between 4-6 full pages of content, double-spaced – this doesnot include the Title page and the Reference page (both on separate pages) that do not contribute to page count. Use of images/tables/diagrams will not count for total page number either.
Students will be assigned individual topics related to physiology and pathological conditions of physiological systems by their instructor. You must write your paper based on your assigned topic. 
Your paper must be submitted as a PDF (.pdf) or Word document (.doc or .docx). These are the only file types that will be accepted.
Assignment Checklist
Checkbox Sections & Criteria
Title page
Description of Pathology
The body of the paper should include the following sections:
• Normal Anatomy of the body system
• Normal Physiology of the body system
• Mechanism of Pathology
• Prevention
• Treatment
Conclusion
Reference page
Between 4-6 full pages of content, double-spaced –  Title page and the Reference page (both on separate pages)  do NOT contribute to page count. Use of images/tables/diagrams will not count for total page number either.
Be sure to include in-text citations where appropriate. You should have a minimum of one in-text for every final reference you have listed.
A minimum of three reputable sources are required for this assignment.
All sources need to be cited properly in APA format – in-text citations and references
Times New Roman, 12 pt. font

See attachment for case study details Mediaction must be from 2nd generation on

See attachment for case study details
Mediaction must be from 2nd generation on

See attachment for case study details
Mediaction must be from 2nd generation only
Sources no more than 5 years old
Answer all the following questions below using case study information
1.Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
a. Select one drug to treat the diagnosis(es) or symptoms.
b. List medication class and mechanism of action for the chosen medication.
c. Write the prescription in prescription format.
d. Provide an evidence-based rationale for the selected medication using at least one scholarly reference. Textbooks may be used for additional references but are not the primary reference.
e. List any side effects or adverse effects associated with the medication.
f. Include any required diagnostic testing. State the time frame for this testing (testing is before medication initiation or q 3 months, etc.). Includes normal results range for any listed laboratory tests.
g. Provide a minimum of three appropriate medication-related teaching points for the client and/or family.

Consist of 3, topic specific professional development activities (PDAs) These 3

Consist of 3, topic specific professional development activities (PDAs) These 3

Consist of 3, topic specific professional development activities (PDAs) These 3 x 650 word PDAs provide a concise demonstration of your learning on aspects of neonatal physiology, altered physiology and evidenced based treatment, provided in the neonatal transitional and special care setting
Neonatal Hypothermia (650 words)
Neonatal Jaundice (650 words)
Neonatal Hypoglycaemia (650 words)
Referencing.
I have attached information of how to write the essay and also attached examples please see and follow the method of examples.

Discussion Prompt A 64-year-old Black male with a history of hypertension presen

Discussion Prompt
A 64-year-old Black male with a history of hypertension presen

Discussion Prompt
A 64-year-old Black male with a history of hypertension presents to your clinic for complaints of headaches and blurry vision x 2 days. He denies any weakness, numbness, chest pain, shortness of breath, palpitations, or recent, illicit drug use. He states he has been compliant with his medications (hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg and metoprolol 50 mg BID), and he took his meds this morning. Recent labs from 3 weeks ago indicate no diabetes. He has no other medical history.
His vitals include: B/P 195/115, P- 90, T- 98.9, R- 20.
Recent labs (3 weeks prior):
Total Cholesterol – 263 mg/dl
LDL-192 mg/dl
HDL- 35 mg/dl
Trig- 180 mg/dl
He did not return for these results and did not start any new meds.
Discuss your differentials and the most likely diagnosis and plan of care for this patient, including his ASCVD risk, specific goals, medications, referrals, and follow-up. Remember to include your rationales. Support your work with primary and secondary references, such as clinical practice guidelines, do not use point-of-care references.
Expectations
Initial Post:
Length: A minimum of 280 words, not including references
Citations: At least two high-level scholarly reference in APA from within the last 5 years