Philosophy : Philosophy - punditwritersbay.com

explain Lache’s definition of courage, and at least one of Socrates objections

explain Lache’s definition of courage, and at least one of Socrates objections to that definition. Secondly, offer your own original philosophical response to this debate and argue for your position.

QUESTION: Having considered the arguments from Hester and Steinberg (really stud

QUESTION: Having considered the arguments from Hester and Steinberg (really study the authors’ conclusions and supporting premises), what do you think would be a medically effective and ethical way of solving the organ-scarcity problem? Why?
Please respond in full sentences with standard punctuation (not informal or chat/text punctuation), citing relevant quotes/passages from the texts we are studying (no need to conduct extra research, just consider the texts themselves).

Objective In this research paper, students will delve into the realm of AI-gener

Objective
In this research paper, students will delve into the realm of AI-generated art, examining it through the perspectives of three major philosophers who have extensively commented on aesthetics and moral aspects of art. These philosophers are likely to predate the phenomenon of AI-generated art. Thus, your task will be to thoughtfully surmise and extrapolate what these philosophers might have thought about AI-generated art, had they been aware of it. The aim is to contextualize the implications of AI in the fields of creativity, originality, artistic value, and the intertwined moral questions.
Essay Prompt
The advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has led to a distinctive artistic movement: art generated without direct human creation. As AI technology infiltrates the world of aesthetics, it introduces a range of moral and ethical dilemmas. These dilemmas necessitate a philosophical discussion about the nature and value of such artworks.
Your task is to critically analyze the questions and implications surrounding AI-generated art, guided by the hypothetical perspectives of three prominent philosophers from Chapter 10 who have tackled aesthetics and the ethical dimensions of art. You are expected to infer and articulate what these philosophers, who predate the AI art era, might have thought about this new form of art creation.
Instructions
Introduction: Begin by outlining the essay’s objectives. Provide a brief overview of how AI facilitates the creation of art.
Philosophical Foundations: Dive into the aesthetics and moral philosophies as defined by your chosen three philosophers. Discuss their foundational concepts, ideas about art, and surmise how they might interpret AI-created art.
Personal Reflection: Share your standpoint on the issue. Predict the future trajectory of art in the context of advancing AI technologies. Evaluate the distinction, if any, in value and ethical considerations between human-crafted and AI-produced art.
Conclusion: Summarize your findings, highlighting the broader consequences and ethical considerations of AI’s involvement in art for both contemporary society and the future of creativity.
Citations: Ensure all references are accurately cited in MLA 9th edition format.
Requirements:
Word Count: 1000-1500 words.
Citations: All information derived from external sources must be properly cited in MLA (Modern Language Association) 9th edition format. MLA citations include both in-text citations and a “Works Cited” page at the end of the document. Engaging in plagiarism will result in receiving an F for the course, as stated in the syllabus.
Anonymity: To ensure impartial grading, please do not include your name anywhere in your essay, including the filename. This exclusion should be the only deviation from standard MLA formatting.
Sources: Minimum of 5 sources, with thorough interpretation and evaluation.
Suggested Resources
The Big Questions Chapter 10: Beauty
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (SEP) has 1800 entries as of Summer 2023. Entries are managed by field experts and reviewed by an Editorial Board.
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (IEP), founded in 1995, is a free, peer-reviewed resource on philosophy topics. Run by volunteers, it has 30 editors and 300 authors with doctorates.
Dallas College Philosophy & Religion Lib Guide The Dallas College Philosophy Lib Guide is designed for efficient academic research, offering access to philosophy databases and news publications. Consider using news articles as real-life examples. The ‘How to Research’ section provides librarians’ contact information for early assistance in your study. If you need citation help, the ‘Citation Help’ section has MLA reference tools.
Dallas College Tutoring Services: You have access to free tutoring. Our writing tutors are available to assist you with the writing and citation process.

Objective In this research paper, students will delve into the realm of AI-gener

I have chosen essay prompt number 3 (“On pages 21 – 23, Shaw argues that it is p

I have chosen essay prompt number 3 (“On pages 21 – 23, Shaw argues that it is possible to objectively assess the merits of competing moral systems/principles by reference to their ability to fulfil the function of moral systems/principles, i.e., the promotion of human flourishing. Write an essay in which you articulate at least one good reason for thinking Shaw’s argument is not well-supported.”), in the “essay1instructions.pdf” document. My working thesis for this prompt is: “In this essay, I will argue that Shaw’s method of objectively evaluating the merits of competing moral principles by examining their purpose and effectiveness in achieving that purpose is overly general and ambitious. ” Edit this thesis if needed.
I ask the writer to carefully follow all instructions and formats provided, and please refer to the sample essays written in the “3. how to Write an Essay.pdf” document to write an essay in this same tone/style. I have attached specific pages from assigned readings in the text that we are allowed to use, and have also attached a document that includes all viewpoints that can be used to make arguments. I ask for the use of 2-3 quotations to help support the points being made (do not worry about citing specific quotes, I can do that as I have access to all texts.) If any more information is required, do not hesitate to reach out. Please do try your best to write the best piece of work you can produce. Update me with every paragraph you finish for me to have a look through so that I can ensure this is what I want.
Thank you and good luck!

Final Paper Topic: – We noted that there is often a difference between broad gui

Final Paper Topic:
– We noted that there is often a difference between broad gui

Final Paper Topic:
– We noted that there is often a difference between broad guiding principles and specific rules to follow. Both the formal/material norm and professional codes of ethics discussions noted instances when a broad guideline might not be helpful in resolving a particular ethical dilemma. For your final paper, you will first identify the relevant code of ethics for your major. You will then identify an ethical dilemma within your field (normally an area of controversy) and analyze the professional code of ethics in light of that problem.
– Identifying a controversy might be tricky – an ethical problem might already have a solution (e.g., if the conduct is illegal, it is likely that the code of ethics already prohibits it). You are looking for areas and issues where professionals are uncertain as to what they ought to do. Consider whistleblowing as discussed in class: it is entirely possible that a particular professional practice may fall into ethically/legally gray territory. It represents a conflict between perceived duties to one’s employer and perceived duties to the public. While protections ostensibly exist, many whistleblowers face significant professional repercussions and are hesitant to sacrifice their personal or professional well-being. At the same time, many people would want whistleblowers to warn them of dangers in products and structures. How should the professional proceed? How does the professional code of ethics handle the great potential for self-sacrifice?
– A strong final paper will address questions like these, exploring issues in law and philosophy. As this is a course in applied ethics, the bulk of your paper should be exploring the ethical reasoning behind your position – what philosophical principles are at stake? Why do they matter?
Paper requirements:
– Your final paper must be 8-10 pages (full text, not partial pages) and at least 2500 words.
– Your final paper must incorporate research from at least 8 sources that are:
-> Peer-reviewed
– Published after 2000
– 8+ pages in length
– Formatted in Times New Roman, 12 pt font, and double-spaced.
– No additional spaces after paragraphs
– No added lines to headers/footers
Paper Methods of Evaluation:
1. Response to topic- 20%:- Addresses the topic clearly and responds effectively to all aspects of the task.
2. Understanding and use of supporting documents and resources, if applicable (includes transitions & commentary) -20%:- Demonstrates a thorough critical understanding of the activity, issue, or idea in developing an insightful response.
3. Quality & Clarity of thought-20%:- Explores the issues thoughtfully and in-depth.
4. Organization Development Support -20 %:- Coherently organized with ideas supported by apt reasons and well-chosen examples.
5. Syntax & Command of Language-10%:- Has an effective, fluent style marked by syntactic variety and clear command of language.
6. Grammar, Usage, Mechanics -10 %:- Is generally free from errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics.
Writing Tips:
Important: This page contains information that will help you approach your final paper.
General Paper Writing Tips
College papers (and philosophy papers in particular) are not like high school writing – this is not a five paragraph essay. You are developing a strong position on a complex topic over the course of a semester, so your work must reflect a high level of effort. I’ve been producing college and professional-level writing for over 25 years at this point, so there are a few tips and tricks I’ve learned which can help you.
Don’t write linearly. You don’t want to write your introduction, then your body paragraphs, and then your conclusion. This encourages writing to meet the paper minimums, which tends to lower the quality of the argument. Your thesis page serves as an outline for the final paper, so write your body paragraphs first and see where it takes you. It isn’t uncommon for new or different ideas to occur as you are writing them. Generally, it is best to write your body paragraphs first, then your conclusion (to see where the argument took you), and then your introduction (what you need to include in order to set the stage for your argument).
Revisit your writing repeatedly. Writing is a recursive process – you need to go back and reread what you have written periodically to see how it all hangs together. It is entirely possible that your thoughts are getting disjointed as you write and that sections of text may be more appropriate elsewhere in your paper (or in a different order). Use your voice and read what you’ve written out loud. Your ears will catch things that your eyes do not.
Worry about formatting after you get the text out. Your final paper must be 8-10 pages and 2500 words (minimum) formatted in 12pt Times New Roman, double-spaced, with 1″ margins and no extra spaces between paragraphs. This does not mean that you have to format your paper like this from the start. When I write, I start with single spacing and 10pt or 12pt font and I write in sections (so different sections of my writing have different files). Once I am satisfied that my argument is complete, I will put the sections together and see where it stands in terms of length (professional publications often have both minimum and maximum word counts). The math is pretty simple – if I have four complete pages of text, I know that will be 8 pages when it is double-spaced. I’ve found that if I worry more about meeting the minimum length, the quality of my writing suffers. If I focus more on the quality of my writing, the length is generally there. The ideas matter more, especially on complex topics. If we are giving complex topics adequate attention, paper length shouldn’t be an issue. If we are only providing superficial discussion (or skipping around between a variety of topics), we aren’t demonstrating understanding or mastery and these papers tend to have more fluff to meet length requirements. It’s painfully obvious when a paper is written this way.
Don’t rely on quotes. Strong writing normally paraphrases – it is uncommon (and, in fact, relatively rare) for a research paper/article to contain block quotes (and if they are present at all, they represent at most 10-15% of the paper). Stronger writing shows how material is integrated into a larger position – the articles referenced are shown to support and inform the argument being made. Block quotes are not arguments in themselves, nor are they original content. Papers that are reliant on block quotes or bullet point lists generally earn lower grades as they reflect less actual effort. Bullet point lists are especially egregious and are better served by summaries or inclusion as an appendix instead of the body of the paper.
Care about what you are working on. The language you use matters. Mistakes like grammar, spelling, and word choice matter. My grandfather told me that everything we put our name on reflects on who we are. If your final paper is sloppy (writing, formatting, alphabetizing sources and keeping fonts consistent, etc., etc.), then that reflects on your work ethic. You have fifteen weeks to work on your ideas and their expression – your final paper needs to reflect that. This is a professional environment even though you are all learning new material and skills. There are still expectations that need to be met and good habits that will need to be formed – they will help you in your other coursework and your professional lives. Even if you don’t buy into the idea that your work reflects on you, recognize that many recruiters and companies are looking for people who are effective communicators in professional environments.

Read Thomas Nagel’s “The Absurd” (available in D2L). Make sure you understand Na

Read Thomas Nagel’s “The Absurd” (available in D2L). Make sure you understand
Na

Read Thomas Nagel’s “The Absurd” (available in D2L). Make sure you understand
Nagel’s main point about absurdity as well as his other, related arguments.
2. Write an essay on ONE of the following topics.
a. Do you agree with Nagel’s distinction between ordinary and philosophical types of
absurdity?
1. Exposition
First, and most importantly, you should give a careful exposition of Nagel’s argument. This should constitute approximately 1/2 of your essay. Make sure that your exposition is focused. In other words, if you are dealing with one part of Nagel’s argument, there is no need for you to summarize the whole paper. You are partly being evaluated on your ability to focus your paper on the topic that you are interested in. Ask yourself: What is the structure of Nagel’s argument? What are his premises? What are his conclusions? What support does he offer for his premises? (You may, if you wish, set out part of all of Nagel’s argument in standard form, as part of your exposition. But if you do this, you must still describe the argument: in
other words, the standard form cannot be the entirety of your exposition.)
2. Critical Evaluation
Second, you should offer a critical evaluation of exactly one part or aspect of Nagel’s
argument. This should come in the second part of your essay, after the exposition, and should constitute approximately 1/2 of your essay. Your critical evaluation should be narrowly focused, and should be directed specifically at one aspect of Nagel’s argument. Your critical evaluation might, for instance, address one of the following questions: How well does Nagel set out his topic? Are there defects in either his conception of the topic or of the relevant notions involved? (Be specific.) How successful is one part or aspect of Nagel’s argument? (Be specific.). Does Nagel’s conclusion follow logically from his premises? Why, or why not? (Be specific.)
Other Instructions:
Before you start writing, please consult the document entitled “Notes on Reading and Writing Philosophy” for details on what is expected in a critical exposition. This document is available in D2L.
You may use secondary sources in writing this essay, but this is neither required nor
encouraged. Whether or not you use secondary sources, you must include a reference list at the end of your essay, listing the sources you used in writing the paper (even if this is just the primary source, Nagel).
It is expected that your essay will be formatted in accordance with the generally accepted standards for written academic work. Papers that fail to meet these standards may be penalized; in extreme cases, they will not be graded. Please make sure that your essays are formatted in the manner described in the document entitled “Expectations Concerning Academic Writing”, also available in D2L. Please pay particular attention to the section entitled “Quotation, Attribution, and Acknowledgement”, which contains information about plagiarism.