Narrative Passage Paper (Interpretive Guidelines) Select a key passage, approxim

Narrative Passage Paper (Interpretive Guidelines)
Select a key passage, approxim

Narrative Passage Paper (Interpretive Guidelines)
Select a key passage, approximately two to five verses—from a larger “resurrection” passage in the
Gospel: Matthew 28, Mark 16, Luke 24, or John 20-21. Follow the guidelines below in gathering
observational information and research for your paper. (Know that it is appropriate at first to gather
more information than fits in a five page paper, but this gathering of observation and research allows for
reducing and editing that makes for a well written paper—succinct, clear, and cohesive.)
I. General Steps (Passage)
A. Based on the author’s style and arrangement of thought, define the limits of the overall passage
to be considered.
B. Read the passage several times, jotting down observations and questions (about the author,
audience, purpose, tone, key words, difficulties, etc.—when reading, use different translations
and available Bible study tools in determining the significant words and phrases of the passage).
C. Divide the passage into its “units of thought” (similar to contemporary paragraphs).
D. Decide which of these “units of thought” (sections) of the passage will be the primary focus of
the paper (two to five verses–for a 4-5 page paper, the subject needs to be narrowed).
II. Specific Steps
A. Consider how the chosen passage fits within the overall flow of the book.
o Analyze the relationship of the chosen passage to the preceding and following
passages (“What part does this passage have in the overall narrative?” In other
words, “What purpose does the author have in placing this passage here in this part
of his Gospel?”).
o Analyze the relationship of the chosen passage to the rest of the Gospel (“How does
this passage fit in the overall context of the Gospel?”).
B. Research the cultural-historical background of the passage (“What is happening in this passage
that is unique to the first century context—concerning religious, political, or social customs and
context—that would help the reader better understand the meaning of the passage ‘then’?”).
C. Make note of any literary devices and their function in the passage.
D. [Analyze key sentences—grammar and function—of the passage (consult exegetical
commentaries).]
E. Analyze key words–determine the range of meaning that the author may have intended.
o Determine the possible meanings of this word in the passage (consult other
translations and a quality lexicon) and in other sections of the Gospel [use a
concordance or Greek Lexicon; optional: consider how this word is used in other
books of the New Testament, Old Testament, and Greco-Roman culture (“culture
determines meaning”].
o Decide on authorial intent and meaning for the significant word(s) and phrase(s).
F. Paraphrase the passage in your own words.
2
III. Broader Theological Steps (in relation to biblical and theological teaching).
A. Determine one or two key theological truths from this passage (specifically that the author
intends).
B. Acknowledge and consult other passages in this Gospel which might add to the theological
significance of the passage.
C. [For this size of a paper, the following is not needed, but relevant for future papers:
Acknowledge and consult other New Testament and Old Testament passages which might add
to the theological significance of the passage.]
III. Application for Christian Ministry
A. Draw out one or two key principles from the passage.
B. Make an application for today based on your work.
Writing Instructions:
• After writing the body of the paper, write a brief introductory paragraph (Introduction)
which gains relevant attention and leads directly into a clear one-sentence thesis at the
end of this first paragraph. Also at the end of the paper, include a brief paragraph
(Conclusion) which restates the main points of the paper—without adding new
information.
• Due to the short length of the paper, limit verbatim quotations to a phrase or sentence:
place Scriptural address in parenthesis, such as (24:3-5).
• Use footnotes (10 point font) or parenthetical references (Turabian).
• Recommended: arrange the “Body” of the paper in four relevant sections with
appropriate length–something like:
o “Background of the Key Passage” (1 page double spaced, New Times Roman, 12
point font);
o “Meaning of the Passage ‘Then,’” (2 pages);
o “Theological Truth” (1/2 to 1 page)
o “Application for Today” (1/2 to 1 page).
• Use at least two exegetical commentaries for the second section (when determining the
meaning “then”), and use at least four total scholarly sources for the paper.
• See rubric for grading criteria
Grading Criteria
• 70% Content and Analysis—interpretive steps are completed with quality research, appropriate
detail and relevance.
• 15% Organization and Style—paper is well organized (Introduction, thesis, Conclusion, cohesive
paragraphs, and transitions) and is written in a formal tone.
• 15% Format and Grammar—paper is free of grammatical errors and cites sources properlyincluding a bibliography with at least four quality sources).
Please cite page numbers of source.

I have attached the documents of instructions. PLEASE FOLLOW ALL DETAILS VERY CL

I have attached the documents of instructions. PLEASE FOLLOW ALL DETAILS VERY CL

I have attached the documents of instructions. PLEASE FOLLOW ALL DETAILS VERY CLOSELY!
We are moving forward with a CHRONOLOGICAL FLOW CHART, so please keep in mind when refering to the instruction document.
INSTRUCTIONS DOCUMENT: Portfolio: Organzatin Phase Assignment Instructions
RUBRIC DOCUMENT: Portfolio: Organization Phase Grading Rubric
I have also attached my proposal assignment expressing more information of the direction and justification for moving forward with the Chronological Flow Chart option.
I WILL UPLOAD PROFESSOR FEEDBACK ON THIS once i hear back – that may be helpful in formulating the next portion of this project.

Instructions: Why is the existence of evil and suffering such a problem for the

Instructions:
Why is the existence of evil and suffering such a problem for the

Instructions:
Why is the existence of evil and suffering such a problem for the Christian worldview?
Does any other worldview beside Christian theism have an answer to pain and suffering? Discuss.
Summarize possible theistic responses to the problem of evil, including natural catastrophes.
Read and reflect on the assigned material carefully. In some cases there are no right or wrong answers to the questions; what I am looking for is thoughtful engagement with each question. Be sure to answer all parts of each question.
Make use of Gilson and Weitnauer, eds., True Reason, chap. 15

“The clerics who are struggling to make sense of the tsunami must not have notic

“The clerics who are struggling to make sense of the tsunami must not have notic

“The clerics who are struggling to make sense of the tsunami must not have noticed that this is hardly the first display of God’s penchant for wanton, homicidal mischief. Leaving out man-made genocide, war, and even those “natural” disasters, like drought, and famine, to which “man” invariably contributes through his inept social arrangements, God has a lot to account for in the way of earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, and plagues.” Barbara Ehrenreich in the Progressive magazine, March, 2005. How would you respond to a statement like this? Give the most thoughtful and compassionate reply you can.

Unit Discussion 5 The Historical Books of the OT include “the Form

Unit Discussion 5
The Historical Books of the OT include “the Form

Unit Discussion 5
The Historical Books of the OT include “the Former Prophets”: Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings; and sections of the “the Writings”: Ruth, Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther.
Modern scholarship has adopted the theory of Martin Noth, who proposed that Deuteronomy–2 Kings is a unified work written during the exilic period. This group of writings is referred to as the Deuteronomistic History. Variations in theories of composition center on the questions of date and the number of editions. The so-called Deuteronomistic History, like Deuteronomy, views Israelite history in light of the covenant. The kings of Israel and Judah are evaluated by their disposition toward the covenant and their attempt (or lack of attempt) to bring about reform. The books also answer the exiles’ question, “Where did things go wrong?” Though Noth argued this meant a late date for the composition of Deuteronomy, a legitimate relationship between it and certain historical books does not necessitate such a conclusion.
In order to understand the Bible’s historical literature properly, we must frame it as a key part of God’s self-revelation. The primary function of the historical literature is not to record history, but rather to convey instruction about and knowledge of God.
Joshua’s purpose is to reveal the role of God in keeping his covenant promises to Abraham by giving the land to Israel. The book describes the Israelites’ entrance into the land, the commissioning of Joshua, and the conquest narratives, then details the territorial boundaries of the tribes and narrates the renewal of the covenant.
Major theological themes of Joshua include covenant and land, the ban, the divine warrior, sovereign involvement, and corporate solidarity. The land demonstrates the veracity of the covenant and is evidence of God’s special favor upon Israel. The ban refers to God’s command to completely annihilate the inhabitants of Canaan. Yahweh is frequently pictured as a divine warrior in Joshua who leads his people in battle. This is closely related to God’s sovereign involvement in history. This concept cannot be removed from the book without serious damage being done to its theological purpose. Finally, Joshua 7—the narrative of Achan’s sin—highlights the importance of corporate solidarity in Joshua.
The purpose of Judges is to explain the theological significance of the events between Joshua and David. The recurring disobedience and apostasy of the Israelites under the tribal leadership brings them under God’s punishment (in enslavement) and subsequent mercy (in deliverance). The book demonstrates that the people need a king, not merely to lead them in battle, but to lead them in covenant faithfulness. Judges records Israel’s repetitive cycle of sin, punishment, cry for deliverance, the Lord’s deliverance.
The judges were raised up by God to deliver the Israelites, but the book specifies very little of their role apart from military leadership. The Spirit of the Lord plays a prominent role in the book, at times granting authority to the judges and empowering them for their tasks.
To understand the apostasy of Israel evident throughout this book, we must consider the contrast between the monotheism taught in the covenant and the polytheism which pervaded Canaanite culture. The failure of the initial generations to perpetuate the covenant teaching ensured that the Israelites simply adopted the prevailing worldview of their neighbors.
Key Terms
Deuteronomistic History: Martin Noth proposed that Deuteronomy–2 Kings is a unified work written primarily during the exilic period. This term describes Deuteronomy–2 Kings in Noth’s theory, which remains a dominant theory today
historiography: The writing of history or the product of historical writing; a collection of historical literature
theocracy: a state or nation ruled directly by God
Canaan: area of land in Palestine conquered by the Israelites
judge: charismatic leader appointed by God to lead Israel for a specific time and purpose
Sea Peoples: group of people from the Mediterranean who migrated to the ancient Near East at the end of the thirteenth century
Key Ideas
The faithfulness of God in fulfilling the covenant promises.
The conquest and apportionment of the land.
The importance of obedience.
The Old Testament recorded history for primarily theological purposes.
God’s justice and grace.
God’s sovereign provision of deliverers.
Covenant failure by the people, the priests, and the tribal leadership.
The role of the Spirit of the Lord.
Discussion Forum Question: READ Joshua 24:29-31; Judges 3:7-10; 4:4-9; 8:22-28; 14:8-10
Having read the listed Scripture passages, please respond to the following questions in 150 – 250 words:
How would you compare and contrast the obedience of the people of Israel and that of her leaders in the books of Joshua and Judges? Which leaders seem to represent righteous leadership of Israel and which are very much cut from the same cloth as the people? What term is applied to Joshua that is not applied to the other leaders in the reading? What difference does this make?
We are used to using positive examples from Scripture to teach us about our relationship with God, how might we use the negative examples to help us understand both God and ourselves before him?
How does this relate to you?

In this assignment, you will have the opportunity to explain how to find your pu

In this assignment, you will have the opportunity to explain how to find your pu

In this assignment, you will have the opportunity to explain how to find your purpose by completing the “Finding Your Purpose” document.
Use topic Resources to support your claims.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Reminder: This is a templated document so the LopesWrite score will be higher due to the directions and questions.

Accomplish Week 2 You must respond to the following questions. You are expected

Accomplish Week 2
You must respond to the following questions. You are expected

Accomplish Week 2
You must respond to the following questions. You are expected to use your textbook and any other scholarly resources you might find helpful in order to participate in the conversation.
Be sure to copy and paste the entire question into your thread. Remember to write a minimum of 200 words for each answer before 11:59 PM Sunday.
This paper must be submitted in a Word.doc!
Make proper citations in your answers as well as bibliography for scholarly resources as well.
As you read Mark 1:21-5:43 you notice Jesus possessing authority. He has authority to teach, to forgive sins, over creation, over demons, and to heal the sick. Refer back to page 1812 and read about Jesus’ authority under The Distinctives of Mark. What do you believe the main purpose(s) of Mark’s recording Jesus’ authority? Mark presents Jesus as the suffering servant as well. Do you think it is contradictory for a servant to have such authority? Why or why not?