Category: Science

Discuss and demonstrate selected current practices in clinical chemistry.
Discuss research of current methodologies(Pick one – You can choose which ever one you want):
a. Colorimetric reactions
b. Chemiluminessence
c. Enzyme Linked Fluorescent Immunoassay
d. DNA amplification
e. High Performance Liquid Chromatography

1. Select a method from the following: colorimetry, chemiluminessence, enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay, DNA amplification, high performance liquid chromatography, and research this method using manufacturer publications and Pubmed or other search engines.
2. Following the example I have provided for you, in APA format submit a 2-page report which meets the criteria required.
3. Explain the principle of each method.
4. List the type of specimens used for each method.
5. List at least 3 analytes that may be detected using this method.
6. Describe how each method rates as far as reliability (accuracy and precision).
7. Name lab instrument manufacturers that use these methods.
8. Discuss your findings briefly on the message board.
9. State whether or not you are familiar with any of these current methods (Yes, I am familiar with any of these current methods. I work as a Medical Laboratory Scientist. – Make it sound prettier)

Initial posting (IP) due Today before 9 pm (200-300 words). Research competencies have been established by the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). The nurse’s role in research is primarily based on their level of education. Responsibility grows as the nurse’s level of education increases from the baccalaureate, to the masters, and then to the doctorate. The baccalaureate prepared nurse is expected to be a consumer of research. Discuss the expectations of a consumer of research and share at least one way you are currently meeting that expectation as a working RN. Read the guidelines below in their entirety, as well as the grading rubric for discussions, before you begin your work. IP: requires two references: 1) one from an English-titled, peer-reviewed nursing journal (less than five years old) and 2) one from the course textbook. RTP: requires you to reply to one peer posting. RTP requires one reference from an English-titled, peer-reviewed nursing journal (less than five years old). This article must be different from the one you used for your IP and the one your peer used for their IP and RTP. Articles must be related to nursing practice in the U.S. Postings based on practice outside of the U.S. will not be graded. The maximum number of references for each posting is two. References must be obtained via the BC online library. Papers with references that are not retrievable by the professor through the BC online library, or that use non-course textbooks, will be graded zero (0). Postings on the discussion board are to be in APA format. In addition to posting to the discussion board, attach the IP as a Word doc in APA format, which includes, but is not limited to: separate title and reference pages, a running head, page numbers, title of paper, title page info (your name, Broward College, course number and name, professor’s name, and due date), in-text citations (including the page or paragraph number you found the paraphrased info on), and references. APA will be assessed on both the discussion board postings and the Word document. Do not use any quotes–paraphrase instead. the first article citation Reference ( please make sure to paraphrase and not use direct quote ) reference for the journal Sullivan, V., Wilson, M. N., Gross, D. P., Jensen, O. K., Shaw, W. S., Steenstra, I. A., & Hayden, J. A. (2022). Expectations for Return to Work Predict Return to Work in Workers with Low Back Pain: An Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-Analysis. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 32(4), 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-022-10027-w

Discuss and demonstrate selected current practices in clinical chemistry.
Discuss research of current methodologies(Pick one – You can choose which ever one you want):
a. Colorimetric reactions
b. Chemiluminessence
c. Enzyme Linked Fluorescent Immunoassay
d. DNA amplification
e. High Performance Liquid Chromatography

1. Select a method from the following: colorimetry, chemiluminessence, enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay, DNA amplification, high performance liquid chromatography, and research this method using manufacturer publications and Pubmed or other search engines.
2. Following the example I have provided for you, in APA format submit a 2-page report which meets the criteria required.
3. Explain the principle of each method.
4. List the type of specimens used for each method.
5. List at least 3 analytes that may be detected using this method.
6. Describe how each method rates as far as reliability (accuracy and precision).
7. Name lab instrument manufacturers that use these methods.
8. Discuss your findings briefly on the message board.
9. State whether or not you are familiar with any of these current methods (Yes, I am familiar with any of these current methods. I work as a Medical Laboratory Scientist. – Make it sound prettier)

Please review all documents and let me know which topic you choose (you can use one of the topics provided in the paper guideline or let me know if you choose a different topic so I can run it by one of the TAs in the class to see if it is ok to use).
This is an argumentative research paper for a History of Science college course, senior level. Please see all attachments and read carefully as well as reach out to me with additional questions. The paper guideline is the attachment labeled “Argumentative Research Paper 1” which also includes some topics you can choose from to expand upon. In addition to the final paper, I need to submit a Draft or paper plan before submitting this research paper (that will also be graded); please see the attachment labeled “Paper Plan(required) OR Full Draft (optional) for Paper 1”, this tells you what the paper plan or draft should include for submission. (Do not pay attention to the due dates on the attachments, the draft is due Nov1 and the actual final paper is due Nov 8) but I want it back by Oct23 to make sure its ok and have enough time to send the the TAs to review it. I’ve attached all the lecture PowerPoints from Module 1 labeled “lec 2-1, lec 3-1, lec 4-1, lec 5-1”, as this research paper is also based on information we covered in Module 1, BUT DO NOT USE THE ATTACHED LECTURE POWERPOINTS AS A CITATION/SOURCE, I merely attached it to give you an idea of what this course and module was about so far. Please do not use more than two scholarly sources in this argumentative paper, as the instructor does not want us to use too many sources. Let me know if you have questions so i can try to get answers from the instructor or TA. Thank you in advance.

Please review all documents and let me know which topic you choose (you can use one of the topics provided in the paper guideline or let me know if you choose a different topic so I can run it by one of the TAs in the class to see if it is ok to use).
This is an argumentative research paper for a History of Science college course, senior level. Please see all attachments and read carefully as well as reach out to me with additional questions. The paper guideline is the attachment labeled “Argumentative Research Paper 1” which also includes some topics you can choose from to expand upon. In addition to the final paper, I need to submit a Draft or paper plan before submitting this research paper (that will also be graded); please see the attachment labeled “Paper Plan(required) OR Full Draft (optional) for Paper 1”, this tells you what the paper plan or draft should include for submission. (Do not pay attention to the due dates on the attachments, the draft is due Nov1 and the actual final paper is due Nov 8) but I want it back by Oct23 to make sure its ok and have enough time to send the the TAs to review it. I’ve attached all the lecture PowerPoints from Module 1 labeled “lec 2-1, lec 3-1, lec 4-1, lec 5-1”, as this research paper is also based on information we covered in Module 1, BUT DO NOT USE THE ATTACHED LECTURE POWERPOINTS AS A CITATION/SOURCE, I merely attached it to give you an idea of what this course and module was about so far. Please do not use more than two scholarly sources in this argumentative paper, as the instructor does not want us to use too many sources. Let me know if you have questions so i can try to get answers from the instructor or TA. Thank you in advance.

You will write and submit a review of the article, focusing on these five key areas:
I. The Hypothesis of the Paper
Describe the main idea or question the authors are trying to answer. Explain if the hypothesis is clear and if it makes sense based on what is already known in the field.
II. The Methods Used
Explain what techniques the authors used to test their hypothesis and why they chose those methods. Think about other techniques they could have used and whether their choice was the best one.
III. The Results that Support/Refute the Hypothesis
Look at the results and discuss whether they support or go against the hypothesis you described. Be sure to connect the results directly to the hypothesis and analyze how convincing they are.
IV. The Impact/Limitations
Talk about how important the research is. Also, point out any weaknesses or things the authors could have done better. Consider if the research has any effect on your life or your community.
V. Future Work
Suggest new experiments or ideas for future research that could improve or build on the current study. Propose something creative that could address any problems or gaps in the study.
Important Tips:While you will need to summarize, most of your work should focus on analysis (thinking about what works and what could be improved).
In the Methods section, don’t just list what the authors did—explain whythey chose those methods and if they could have done it better.
For the Results, make sure to connect your critique to the hypothesis. Don’t just copy their findings—analyze and discuss them.
Be critical about any limitations and think about how the research matters in real life.
Come up with new ideas for future research.
Your review should be no more than 2 pages long (11pt font, single-spaced, 1-inch margins).

Describe the BvgAS phosphorelay pathway in the whooping cough pathogen Bordetella pertussis and its relationship to virulence in this pathogen.

Learning goal:I’m working on a science exercise question and need explanation and answer to help me learn.
Basic Principles of PBL
overview
Appropriateness of PBL to my students
How PBL could be used to support student learning
Learning theory and its use in the development of a PBL Approac

You will write and submit a review of the article, focusing on these five key areas:
I. The Hypothesis of the Paper
Describe the main idea or question the authors are trying to answer. Explain if the hypothesis is clear and if it makes sense based on what is already known in the field.
II. The Methods Used
Explain what techniques the authors used to test their hypothesis and why they chose those methods. Think about other techniques they could have used and whether their choice was the best one.
III. The Results that Support/Refute the Hypothesis
Look at the results and discuss whether they support or go against the hypothesis you described. Be sure to connect the results directly to the hypothesis and analyze how convincing they are.
IV. The Impact/Limitations
Talk about how important the research is. Also, point out any weaknesses or things the authors could have done better. Consider if the research has any effect on your life or your community.
V. Future Work
Suggest new experiments or ideas for future research that could improve or build on the current study. Propose something creative that could address any problems or gaps in the study.
Important Tips:While you will need to summarize, most of your work should focus on analysis (thinking about what works and what could be improved).
In the Methods section, don’t just list what the authors did—explain whythey chose those methods and if they could have done it better.
For the Results, make sure to connect your critique to the hypothesis. Don’t just copy their findings—analyze and discuss them.
Be critical about any limitations and think about how the research matters in real life.
Come up with new ideas for future research.
Your review should be no more than 2 pages long (11pt font, single-spaced, 1-inch margins).

Learning goal:I’m working on a science writing question and need support to help me learn.
I need an argumentative essay on the topic climate change and effects on humans