Category: Writing

I need you to help me write a cold email to my doctoral supervisor. Because I want to apply for his doctoral program, the email content needs to include the following parts.
1. Introduce myself and indicate that I would like to apply for the doctoral program in Accounting and Finance at the Macau University of Science and Technology. I completed my undergraduate studies at a joint college between Jimei University and Cook University in the United States, majoring in International Accounting. My graduate major is MBA, which was jointly developed by Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics and the New York Institute of Technology in the United States. I am currently serving as the Party Branch Secretary, Deputy General Manager, and appointed Chief Financial Officer of Xiamen Co., Ltd. Our company’s business includes: bulk trade financing for building materials processing, etc. Branches are located throughout the country, including Xiamen, Shanghai, Guangdong, Tianjin, Hainan, Inner Mongolia, Tangshan, and other places.
2. Mainly to talk about my current research direction, you need to write about an article I published in the national journal “China Collective Economy” titled “The Importance and Implementation Strategies of Strengthening Business Finance Integration in State owned Enterprises”, which was published in the 16th issue of 2024. I will soon publish an article titled “Reflections on the Application of Financial Statement Analysis in Financial Management of State owned Enterprises” in the national journal “Finance and Economics” in the 22nd issue of 2024.
3. This section mainly combines my articles in national journals in the second part, and then focuses on analyzing the similarities between my published papers and my supervisor’s research direction, indicating that our research direction is the same. You need to carefully read the Excel spreadsheet I gave you, which introduces two papers published by my supervisor and two papers published by myself. The main point to express is that my supervisor and I share the same research direction. You must combine the content of the article in my Excel to demonstrate how consistent it really is. This section must quote the topic content previously published by the supervisor, and then explain how I view it, my thoughts, and so on. This is the only way to get my supervisor to accept my application.
4. I would like to reiterate my desire to pursue a PhD and hope for further communication. Then please also ask the supervisor to check the email attachment. I have added two of my research articles. Please give me a chance, mentor.
You must pay attention to email format and polite language, and not plagiarize.

There are 2 parts for this assignment:
Discussion and Assignment:
Discuss the following questions. Provide a full description/in-depth analysis for each question.
1. How do you define diversity, equity, and inclusion individually and wholly as an organizational practice?
2. How does your organization address DEI? Name as many initiatives, interventions, or commitments as you can. How effective have these been in achieving what they were intended for? How do you know? (If you are not currently employed or your organization does not currently address DEI, please research initiatives at an organization similar to yours or the field/industry you would like to work).
3. Affirmative action and quotas have significantly dropped in popularity in the US and some other countries despite research showing effectiveness. However, this isn’t the case in every country, especially for gender quotas. Research a country or industry that implements a quota system for workplace representation. How effective is this system and what are the challenges?
Assignment:
Complete the following workbook assignments, in a Word document. Questions are to be answered in full sentences.
I have attached the assignment pages from the workbook (only for this month until all workbooks have time to be received). Please read the pages before the assigned questions.
Please list the chapter on the document. List the question number (should be the same as the text) and provide a complete, descriptive response for each question (if applicable).
1. Read & Reflect – Chapter 1 (pgs. 9-11): Answer questions 1-5 (located on pgs. 12-13)
2. Read & Reflect – Chapter 2 (pgs. 15-17): Answer questions 1-6 (located on pgs. 18-19)
3. Read & Reflect – Chapter 4 (pgs. 27-28): Answer questions 1-8 (located on pgs. 29-30)
4. Read & Reflect – Chapter 7 (pgs. 47-51): Answer questions 1-6 (located on pgs. 52-53)here are two parts to this assignment:

Overview
Identifying experimental designs in current research and critically analyzing strengths and limitations is an important skill for behavior analysts. For this assignment, you will select one article that demonstrates each of the four experimental designs: reversal, multiple baseline, changing criterion, and alternating treatment and discuss strengths and limitations and well as all forms of validity for each experimental design.
Instructions
Use the template provided by your instructor to complete the following:
From the articles provided by your instructor, choose one article that demonstrates each of the following experimental designs: reversal, multiple baseline, changing criterion, and alternating treatment.
Describe the strengths and limitations of each of the designs.
Define the internal, external, and social validity of each design.
Be sure to provide an APA formatted reference for each article.
Be sure to complete the self-assessment grading rubric included in the template.
Additional Requirements
Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Use current APA style and formatting, paying particular attention to citations and references. Use Academic WriterLinks to an external site. for guidance in citing sources and formatting your paper in proper APA style. See the Writing CenterLinks to an external site. for more APA resources specific to your degree level.
References: A minimum of two scholarly or professional resources.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment , you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 2: Discriminate features of single-subject experimental designs based on current research in the field.Correctly identify one article that demonstrates each of the experimental designs, but misidentify one of them.
Competency 3: Evaluate effectiveness of behavior change procedures by visually analyzing and interpreting single-subject experimental designs included in current research.Clearly describe two strengths and two limitations for each of the designs.
Define the internal, external, and social validity of each design.
Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.Include grading rubric and a mostly accurate self-assessment, with a few errors.
Demonstrate an academic writing style through well-organized prose that follows assignment guidelines.
Demonstrate compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines.
View Rubric
Week 9 Assignment: Experimental Design and Validity
Week 9 Assignment: Experimental Design and Validity
CriteriaRatingsPts
Correctly identify one article that demonstrates each of the experimental designs, but misidentify one of them.50 to >42.5 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Correctly identifies one article that demonstrates each of the experimental designs.42.5 to >35 pts
PROFICIENT
Correctly identifies one article that demonstrates each of the experimental designs, but misidentifies one of them.35 to >0 pts
BASIC
Correctly identifies one article that demonstrates three of the experimental designs, but misidentifies two of them.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not correctly identify one article that demonstrates each of the experimental designs./ 50 pts
Clearly describe two strengths and two limitations for each of the designs.
50 to >42.5 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Clearly describes two strengths and two limitations for each of the designs and provides rationales for the conclusions made.42.5 to >35 pts
PROFICIENT
Clearly describes two strengths and two limitations for each of the designs.35 to >0 pts
BASIC
Clearly describes one strength and one limitation for each of the designs.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not correctly describe the strengths and limitations of any of the designs./ 50 pts
Define the internal, external, and social validity of each design.
50 to >42.5 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Fully defines the internal, external, and social validity of each design and uses examples from the articles to justify their conclusions.42.5 to >35 pts
PROFICIENT
Defines the internal, external, and social validity of each design.35 to >0 pts
BASIC
Defines the internal, external, and social validity of each design but some of the definitions are inaccurate or incomplete.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not correctly define the internal, external, and social validity of any of the designs./ 50 pts
Include grading rubric and a mostly accurate self-assessment, with a few errors.
10 to >8.5 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Includes grading rubric and is accurate with self-assessment.8.5 to >7 pts
PROFICIENT
Includes grading rubric and a mostly accurate self-assessment, with a few errors.7 to >0 pts
BASIC
Includes grading rubric but does not accurately assess one’s own performance.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not include grading rubric with self-assessed score./ 10 pts
Demonstrate an academic writing style through well-organized prose that follows assignment guidelines.
20 to >17 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Demonstrates an academic writing style through well-organized prose that contains no significant grammatical or mechanical errors and follows assignment guidelines.17 to >14 pts
PROFICIENT
Demonstrates an academic writing style through well-organized prose that follows assignment guidelines.14 to >0 pts
BASIC
Demonstrates minimally acceptable writing style, but still has instances of disorganization, grammatical or mechanical errors, or does not follow all assignment guidelines.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not demonstrate an academic writing style./ 20 pts
Demonstrate compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines.
20 to >17 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Develops a paper that is fully compliant with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines.17 to >14 pts
PROFICIENT
Demonstrates compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines.14 to >0 pts
BASIC
Demonstrates minimally acceptable compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines.0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not demonstrate compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines./ 20 pts

Develop a teaching aid that helps explain to a 10-year-old child how messages are transmitted in the brain.
Biopsychology is the study of how the human brain and body work, specifically: How do the cells in our brain lead to our thoughts and actions? That’s the essence of the mind-body problem—what role does biology play?
There’s an old saying that the best way to learn is to teach someone else. For this assessment, you are asked to develop a teaching aid that helps explain to a 10-year-old child how messages are transmitted in the brain. The objective of this assessment is to help you understand the basic actions of the brain by explaining it to the hypothetical 10-year-old child (feel free to test out your fine work on a child you know).Select one brain structure from the list below to focus on in your teaching aid:
Broca’s area.
Wernicke’s area.
Thalamus.
Hypothalamus.
Pons.
Reticular formation.
Cerebellum.
Combine text and visual images to explain to a 10-year-old child the way the brain communicates. You can use either MS Word or MS PowerPoint. Be sure to cite your sources (including any visuals you don’t create).
The final product should answer the following questions:
Explain how neurons communicate. How do neurons work? How do they talk to each other? What happens to leftover transmitters?Consider including the following:Resting potential, graded potential, action potential.
Neurotransmission release.
Excitatory postsynaptic potential or inhibitory neuron potential.
Explain the functions of the area of the brain you chose from the list above.
Helpful tip: Start by reviewing the textbook and creating bullet points for each step. Then reword your bullet points in different ways until you find one that is clear, simple, and easy to understand. You might consider using metaphors if it helps. Lastly, create or find visuals that will help make the explanation easier to understand.
Optional WebAR Experience
Throughout this course, you will find QR Codes that will allow you to interact with integrated Augmented Reality content and experiences. Please use your mobile device to access the tutorial using this QR code.

Assessment Description
Continuing advancements in understanding how the brain works can have profound effects on learning and professional effectiveness. Exploring advances in neuroscience reveals new information about the brain and provides insights into the cognitive processes that support decision-making, problem-solving, and interpersonal interactions that are necessary across all fields. Understanding the newest research on how individuals’ brains function and process information and how and why they retain and recall information allows professionals to optimize educational strategies and training programs for enhanced performance and outcomes.
Using the information from the topic Resources and your own research, write a 750-1,000 word reflection that includes the following:
How the brain generally organizes and reorganizes information.
At least three of the latest findings in research regarding neuroscience and brain development with a description of each supported by a scholarly resource (e.g., how the brain is wired, how synapses form and change, brain malleability, emotional responses in the brain, individuals’ unique brain anatomies).
The connection between learning and brain development, including analysis of how this affects your current or future professional settings.
A minimum of two strategies to apply the latest research in neuroscience and brain development to your current or future professional settings.
Identify the ethical considerations that might arise when applying neuroscience in your current or future professional settings.
Reflect on how understanding and integrating advancements in neuroscience can enhance overall productivity in your current or future professional settings.
Support your reflection with 4-5 scholarly resources.
While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

I need someone whos committed and can write 6-7 sentences on each post card and put it inside envelopes that I will have everything paid for.For each one you complete and I receive I will pay 0.50 cents per completed envelope. I need a minimum of 500 a week. Who ever is interested give me a call/Text at 818-515-8162

Write a 500 word essay about how special education regulations have changed since the initial passing of PL 94-142 in 1975 to the current iteration of IDEA of 2004.

PART 1–
Write a 100-250 word post to introduce yourself by telling us what cartoon character you most admire, and why. Feel free to upload a photo of your favorite cartoon character in your post.
PART 2—
Read these Words of Wisdom for online students
Write a 100-250 word reflection that answers the following six questions:
Which one of the Words of Wisdom statements did you relate to most?
Why did you relate to the Words of Wisdom statement you selected?
How will this course help your current or future career goals?
What are you most excited about learning in this class?
What concerns or anxieties might you be feeling this semester?
What obstacles or challenges might you be experiencing this semester that could impact your participation or academic performance in this class?

This assignment is a PowerPoint presentation that should include speaker not for each slide. You want to ensure you address the benefits of diversity and the characteristics of a diverse organization. Think about the impact these components have on patient care as well.
When selecting individuals for the team, you do not want this team to be executive-heavy. You are to identify the experience everyone brings to the team with workplace diversity initiatives, or you can address the training the group will receive on leading workplace diversity initiatives.

Goals and Priorities

You need to address 3-5 goals for the project. Establishing a team and engaging in interprofessional collaboration are not goals of the project, they are expectations.

Team Composition

Defines the composition of a team. Identify the characteristics of the team members and how they are highly diverse and well-equipped to effectively address and apply ethical codes, diversity, and best practices in healthcare organizations. This can be two slides.

Effective Team Collaboration

Outlines a plan that effectively fosters interprofessional group collaboration for the team, not for the community. This includes multiple proven methodologies used to ensure success with interprofessional collaboration.

Characteristics of a Diverse Organization

Describes the basic characteristics of a diverse and inclusive workplace. These are not individual physical characteristics of the organization, but the characteristics of the organizational culture. You do need to support
your thoughts with scholarly resources.

Benefits of Diversity

Explains the benefits of promoting and supporting diversity within an organization. You do need to use scholarly resources to support your thoughts. You do need to include specific examples of an organization where these initiatives have worked.

Personal Philosophy of Teaching, Revised (Part II)
As discussed earlier in this course, your personal teaching philosophy is a work in progress. During week 8, you will revisit and revise your teaching philosophy that you submitted during week 1. As part of this assignment, you should evaluate your original philosophy and include a one-page discussion of how your thoughts and ideas about teaching have changed and developed during this course. Guidelines for revising your teaching philosophy and the one-page discussion are below.
Assignment Guidelines
Revised Personal Teaching Philosophy (3–5 pages)
Reflect on the teaching principles and practices discussed during the course.
What did you learn about teaching that you did not know prior to this course?
What stood out as important to you over the past 8 weeks?
Consider how you might expand, adapt, or change your original philosophy to your current perspective on teaching (or you may feel compelled to take it in a completely new direction).
Your revised teaching philosophy should:Have a clear focus or theme.
Be authentic and personal.
Relay who you are (or aspire to be) as a teacher.
Exhibit genuine enthusiasm for teaching.
Clearly express your current teaching values and beliefs, and discuss why you hold those values and beliefs (whether or not they have changed).
Describe your current teaching goals (whether or not they have changed).
Explain the teaching methods or strategies that you believe are best (whether or not they are different from your original philosophy). Note: make sure the teaching methods you find best are consistent with your goals.
Incorporate any new ideas and/or practices that encourage a rich teaching and learning experience.
Be 3–5 pages, including the evaluation discussion but excluding title and reference pages; length should suit the context. It should be typed in Times New Roman using 12-point font and double-spaced with 1″ margins.
Be well written, using a first person narrative and present tense.
Follow APA style.
Have no any grammatical, typographical, or spelling errors.
Evaluation Discussion of Teaching Philosophy (1 page)
As part of this revised teaching philosophy assignment, you should include a discussion evaluating how your personal thoughts and ideas about teaching have changed during this course.
After you have revised your personal teaching philosophy, carefully review your original teaching philosophy that you submitted during week 1 of this course.
Compare your original philosophy to your revised teaching philosophy and evaluate the following in a one-page written discussion:Have your teaching goals, methods, or strategies changed, and if so, how and why? Have your teaching priorities and/or perspectives changed or shifted, and if so, how and why?
Do you value different learning experiences, and if so, what are they and why?
Include any additional information that may highlight how your thoughts and ideas have changed or developed during this course.
Include references that you found helpful, insightful, or meaningful in the development of your philosophy of teaching.
In addition to the course texts, include at least two outside sources from peer-reviewed journals to support your ideas.
Your evaluation discussion should:Be one page excluding title and reference pages, typed in Times New Roman using 12-point font, and double-spaced with 1″ margins.
Be well written, using a first person narrative and present tense.
Follow APA style.
Points 100
Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Rubric
NURS_535_DE – NURS535 Personal Philosophy of Teaching Part II
NURS_535_DE – NURS535 Personal Philosophy of Teaching Part II
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall Teaching Philosophy
20 to >15.8 ptsAccomplished
Philosophy paper is personal, mentions students in a positive manner, and clearly indicates a personal viewpoint on teaching.
15.8 to >11.8 ptsEmerging
Philosophy paper is somewhat personal, somewhat mentions students in a positive manner, and somewhat indicates a personal viewpoint on teaching.
11.8 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Philosophy paper is not personal, fails to mention students in a generally positive manner, and a personal viewpoint on teaching is absent or severely lacking in detail.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInstructor Goals/Strategies
20 to >15.8 ptsAccomplished
Goals as an instructor are clearly identified. Actual or anticipated teaching strategies/methods are clearly indicated.
15.8 to >11.8 ptsEmerging
Goals as an instructor are somewhat identified. Actual or anticipated teaching strategies/methods are included but not clearly indicated.
11.8 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Goals as an instructor are absent or significantly lacking. Actual or anticipated teaching strategies/methods are absent or unclear.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall Teaching Strategy, Values and Beliefs
20 to >15.8 ptsAccomplished
A clear explanation on why you teach, how your teaching facilitates student learning, and your values and beliefs on teaching, are included
15.8 to >11.8 ptsEmerging
An explanation on why you teach, how your teaching facilitates student learning, and your values and beliefs on teaching, are included, but not clearly indicated
11.8 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
An explanation on why you teach, how your teaching facilitates student learning and your values and beliefs on teaching, are absent or are significantly lacking in details and relevance.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation Discussion
30 to >23.7 ptsAccomplished
A clear explanation on how your views on teaching have changed is included. This explanation includes information on teaching goals, methods, strategies, and priorities/perspectives.
23.7 to >17.7 ptsEmerging
A somewhat clear explanation on how your views on teaching have changed is included. This explanation includes some information on teaching goals, methods, strategies, and priorities/perspectives.
17.7 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
An explanation on how your views on teaching have changed is absent or significantly lacking. This explanation may include information on teaching goals, methods, goals, strategies, and priorities/perspectives.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization, Writing, & APA
10 to >7.9 ptsAccomplished
Paper is approximately 4-6 pages, double spaced and includes at least two outside sources. Current APA Style followed, and written in APA formal letter format. Written in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner. Information from sources is paraphrased appropriately and accurately cited.
7.9 to >5.9 ptsEmerging
Paper is approximately 3-7 pages in length and includes at least one outside source. APA formal letter format mostly followed. Writing is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is paraphrased and cited correctly.
5.9 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Paper may be significantly more or less than 4-6 pages in length. APA formal letter format may not be followed. Writing is generally unclear and unorganized. Errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension. Sources are missing or improperly cited.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Previous