Thinking about the differences between the standards of proof required for civil

Thinking about the differences between the standards of proof required for civil

Thinking about the differences between the standards of proof required for civil versus criminal law, should the “preponderance of the evidence” level be used for criminal cases? Why or why not?
Discuss the Child Savers Movement. What were their reasons for wanting laws changed? Was their motivation purely altruistic or did they have some less savory reasoning? What was the end result of their efforts?