In this task, you will choose one case study from the attached “Case Studies” document. You will analyze the case study using the tool from Section 2 (systems archetypes tool) to draw conclusions about a system’s relationships, connections, properties, and subsystems. Choose one of the systems archetypes to help you understand the problems in the case study. You will submit a completed systems archetypes tool and a completed analysis that includes the problems in the case as understood through relationships, connections, properties, and subsystems. It will be important to address any changes that occur throughout the case, as shown by the selection of a particular systems archetype.
Note: You must use a systems archetypes tool.
A. Analyze one of the case studies from the attached “Case Studies” document by doing the following:
1. Analyze one of the given case studies using one of the systems archetypes tools.
2. Submit a completed systems archetype tool.
3. Summarize the problems in the case study as understood through its relationships, properties, and subsystems as a result of the changes that occur.
B. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
C. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
RUBRIC
A1:CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not analyze the case study using 1 of the systems archetype tools.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission includes a written analysis of the case study that inaccurately uses 1 of the systems archetype tools.
COMPETENT
The submission includes a written analysis of the case study that accurately uses 1 of the systems archetype tools.
A2:SYSTEMS ARCHETYPE TOOL
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not include a completed systems archetype tool.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission includes an inaccurately completed systems archetype tool.
COMPETENT
The submission includes an accurately completed systems archetype tool.
A3: SUMMARY OF CASE STUDY
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not summarize the problems in the case study as understood through its relationships, properties, and subsystems as a result of the changes that occur.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission inaccurately summarizes the problems in the case study or does not appropriately discuss the relationships, properties, or subsystems as a result of the changes that occur.
COMPETENT
The submission accurately summarizes the problems in the case study as understood through its relationships, properties, and subsystems as a result of the changes that occur.
B:SOURCES
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list; however, the citations or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate.
COMPETENT
The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available.
C:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION
NOT EVIDENT
This submission includes professional communication errors related to spelling, grammar, punctuation, and sentence fluency. For best results, please focus on the specific Correctness errors identified by Grammarly for Education. If you need additional assistance preparing your submission, please contact your Instructor.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
This submission includes professional communication errors related to spelling, grammar, punctuation, and/or sentence fluency. For best results, please focus on the specific Correctness errors identified by Grammarly for Education to help guide your revisions.
COMPETENT
This submission demonstrates correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and sentence fluency. You have demonstrated quality professional communication skills in this submission.