The purpose of this assignment is to apply legal and ethical analysis to importa

The purpose of this assignment is to apply legal and ethical analysis to important employment or labor issues and use that analysis to develop recommendations for the implementation of legally and ethically proper employment practices in a business.
Refer to the concepts presented in Chapters 18 and 19 of the textbook to address the questions related to the Part 1 Essay and the Part 2 Memo. Your instructor will provide you with the prompts to be used for each part.
Part 1 Prompt – Essay: Legal Issues Relating to Employment, Labor, or Employment Law
Part 2 Prompt – Memo: Advising on Employment Law Issues
Part 1 should have a minimum of 750 words. Part 2 should have a minimum of 500 words. The total minimum word count for this assignment is 1,250 words.

Please carefully read the following directions. For this week, you are required

Please carefully read the following directions.
For this week, you are required to answer all of the questions below.
You should have all of the following:
(A) 1 (one) Primary Posting answering each of the questions below by Due Thursday at 11:59 pm. Each question should have at least 7 meaningful sentences that are professionally written. Important -List the questions above your answer.
(B) 2 (two) Follow up reply postings to your classmates with at least 7 meaningful sentences that are also professionally written. Reply to any 2 of your classmates postings for this week stating your opinion. Do you agree with them?, do you have a similar story, etc. Also 7 meaningful Sentences each. Due by Saturday at 11:59 pm.
In total a minimum of 3 postings are required (1 + 2). You can however write additional reply postings if you desire.
(C) Don’t copy from the book or the internet. Plagiarism and AI Generation will result in an F grade
(D) Feel free to list personal experiences that you have had, or those of your friends and family.
(E) It is clear when students put time into their postings and those that rush them. The discussion forum is equivalent to attending class. Postings cannot be made up in subsequent weeks.
(F) Discussion postings are graded. Please see the posted rubric in the syllabus. If the above are followed you will receive full points.
(G) Not completing 2 reply postings results in a 50% point deduction, not completing the Discussion Forum results in a -100% penalty.
Discussion Question 1
Read Ch 1 then Answer the following question.
1. The first Amendment protects free speech.
So, are you free to express yourself by wearing a T shirt that has profanity and some vulgar words Explain? (Remember, despite your opinion, I am looking for the law, look online or throughout your book to write what the law states, even if it differs from your personal views) Simply stating what you believe without any facts or references, will result in 0 points. Remember , not to copy , please put in your own words and cite if necessary.
(Please don’t post profanity, you use ****** in place of letters if necessary)
2. Regarding lawyers, suing and the court system, Do you think that we live in a society that sues each other too much?
Why or Why not?
3. What is your opinion of all the billboards and TV commercials we see and hear for attorneys?
(Note before completing this , you may want to listen to the posted optional audio lectures)
Short posting will receive 0 points
Students that write 7 or more meaningful sentences for each posting (Primary and Reply) typically score 100%
Students that write the bare minimum either get 0 points, or major points deducted.

Please carefully read the following directions. For this week, you are required

Please carefully read the following directions.
For this week, you are required to answer all of the questions below.
You should have all of the following:
(A) 1 (one) Primary Posting answering each of the questions below by Due Thursday at 11:59 pm. Each question should have at least 7 meaningful sentences that are professionally written. Important -List the questions above your answer.
(B) 2 (two) Follow up reply postings to your classmates with at least 7 meaningful sentences that are also professionally written. Reply to any 2 of your classmates postings for this week stating your opinion. Do you agree with them?, do you have a similar story, etc. Also 7 meaningful Sentences each. Due by Saturday at 11:59 pm.
In total a minimum of 3 postings are required (1 + 2). You can however write additional reply postings if you desire.
(C) Don’t copy from the book or the internet. Plagiarism and AI Generation will result in an F grade
(D) Feel free to list personal experiences that you have had, or those of your friends and family.
(E) It is clear when students put time into their postings and those that rush them. The discussion forum is equivalent to attending class. Postings cannot be made up in subsequent weeks.
(F) Discussion postings are graded. Please see the posted rubric in the syllabus. If the above are followed you will receive full points.
(G) Not completing 2 reply postings results in a 50% point deduction, not completing the Discussion Forum results in a -100% penalty.
Discussion Question 1
Read Ch 1 then Answer the following question.
1. The first Amendment protects free speech.
So, are you free to express yourself by wearing a T shirt that has profanity and some vulgar words Explain? (Remember, despite your opinion, I am looking for the law, look online or throughout your book to write what the law states, even if it differs from your personal views) Simply stating what you believe without any facts or references, will result in 0 points. Remember , not to copy , please put in your own words and cite if necessary.
(Please don’t post profanity, you use ****** in place of letters if necessary)
2. Regarding lawyers, suing and the court system, Do you think that we live in a society that sues each other too much?
Why or Why not?
3. What is your opinion of all the billboards and TV commercials we see and hear for attorneys?
(Note before completing this , you may want to listen to the posted optional audio lectures)
Short posting will receive 0 points
Students that write 7 or more meaningful sentences for each posting (Primary and Reply) typically score 100%
Students that write the bare minimum either get 0 points, or major points deducted.

The discussion post topic for Module 5 is focused on non-compete agreements, spe

The discussion post topic for Module 5 is focused on non-compete agreements, specifically from Chapter 14, Section 14-2a in the textbook.
Module 5 Discussion Topic:
Conduct some research (textbook and external research) on the topic of Non-Compete agreements. From your research and learning, please share the following information with your classmates:
What surprised you the most about non-compete agreements?
Do you consider non-compete agreements ethical or unethical being true restraint of trade? Share with the class your reasons why non-compete agreements are either ethical or unethical. Just providing statements like “they are ethical or unethical” without any substance behind that qualifying statement is not acceptable.
If you owned a business, how would you draft a non-compete agreement to protect your company’s interest? What restrictions would you consider to be not too onerous or restricting on employees who leave the company?

Your paper is to be typed and double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font. You

Your paper is to be typed and double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font. Your paper will be at least 3 pages in length. The subject of your paper will be a legal dispute or controversy involving your professional area of interest (accounting, marketing, graphic design, leadership, etc.). You will research the dispute, identify the legal issue and any applicable law, describe the ultimate outcome and include a proposal as to how the issue could have been avoided and/or better handled by the business. I do pay attention to grammar and sentence structure, as it is necessary for good business writing. Your paper will be graded based on these subcategories: 1) Format, Grammar, and Writing Skills; 2) Depth; 3) Use of Research (and proper credit given); and 4) Consistency and Flow.

Your paper is to be typed and double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font. You

Your paper is to be typed and double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font. Your paper will be at least 3 pages in length. The subject of your paper will be a legal dispute or controversy involving your professional area of interest (accounting, marketing, graphic design, leadership, etc.). You will research the dispute, identify the legal issue and any applicable law, describe the ultimate outcome and include a proposal as to how the issue could have been avoided and/or better handled by the business. I do pay attention to grammar and sentence structure, as it is necessary for good business writing. Your paper will be graded based on these subcategories: 1) Format, Grammar, and Writing Skills; 2) Depth; 3) Use of Research (and proper credit given); and 4) Consistency and Flow.

Your paper is to be typed and double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font. You

Your paper is to be typed and double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font. Your paper will be at least 3 pages in length. The subject of your paper will be a legal dispute or controversy involving your professional area of interest (accounting, marketing, graphic design, leadership, etc.). You will research the dispute, identify the legal issue and any applicable law, describe the ultimate outcome and include a proposal as to how the issue could have been avoided and/or better handled by the business. I do pay attention to grammar and sentence structure, as it is necessary for good business writing. Your paper will be graded based on these subcategories: 1) Format, Grammar, and Writing Skills; 2) Depth; 3) Use of Research (and proper credit given); and 4) Consistency and Flow.

This is a link to the Supreme Court of the United States’ opinion in Facebook, I

This is a link to the Supreme Court of the United States’ opinion in Facebook, Inc., 592 U.S. ___ (2021). Using this decision, you will learn how to “brief” a case. Appendix A (pages 400-403) in your textbook will provide guidance for this project. While the examples show some sections numerically listed, your sections should be written in paragraph form. Your brief will need to contain the following sections: facts, legal/procedural history, issue(s), analysis/reasoning, analysis/reasoning for any dissenting and/or concurring opinions, rule of law/holding, and a one-paragraph student response. Be sure to use these sections as headings in your paper. Students may do extra research to ascertain exactly what led to the case, legal terminology, legal theories, explanations from the court, etc. as a full picture of the case may not actually be contained within the opinion. Your paper should be at least 4 pages (but no more than 6 pages) in length. Your paper should be double spaced in size 12 Times New Roman font with one-inch margins, and any extra space between paragraphs should be removed.
Note: As stated in the syllabus, all citations must be in APA format. When citing to a case, APA adopts the formal legal citation system contained within The bluebook: A uniform system of citation. (2010). Cambridge, MA: The Harvard Law Review Association. This book, while useful in the legal community, is not worth your time and money to simply cite a handful of cases over the next eight weeks. Instead, I will give you the correct citation to use. For the first citation in a brief, you should use the long-form citation. Afterwards, students should use the short form citations for all other citations contained in the brief.The long-form citation for this case is Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, 592 U.S. ___, [insert page number] (2021).
The short form citation is (Facebook,592 U.S. at [insert page number]).
There are a number of resources in the class files on Canvas to help you with this assignment including a case-brief template, a sample case brief, and a document titled, “How to Write Papers for Professor Pearson.” Please utilize these resources.

For this week’s discussion post, you will be examining the topic of intentional

For this week’s discussion post, you will be examining the topic of intentional torts. For this discussion post, please address the below scenario and determine if there is a cause of action. An activist group is protesting a company’s safety practices. They decide to lawfully protest outside the building and the management instructs their security personnel to surround them until the police arrive. The protestors feel threatned by the guards and tries to disperse back to their corporate headquarters, but they could not get around the security guards. The police arrived and after their investigation, they let the protestors leave without arrest. The group decides to bring a lawsuit against the company for false imprisonment.
Based on this scenario, please address whether the protestors would be successful. Be sure to explain your answer fully and provide legal content and elements in deriving at your conclusion.