Chapter 8: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iZkK5j2jHM (gender discrimination h

Chapter 8:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iZkK5j2jHM (gender discrimination h

Chapter 8:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iZkK5j2jHM (gender discrimination history)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GLT8JGO_B4 (gender pay gaps)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGtpaMgfKiE (gender discrimination)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1bAAcGQD-g (Title VII and gender discrimination)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCknUJJc3qU (science of gender inequality)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWp_wdP0QIY (Pregnancy discrimination)
Chapter 9:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvlGAY3SqK8 (understanding sexual harassment)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCVnfueYA8Q (History of Sexual Harassment Training)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVtJcVbbjcA (Title VII and SH)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nI-BJR9GPE (same sex harassment and Title VII)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGc7KfQ3uWs (sexual harassment in the workplace)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xmEJ6KieKA (hostile environment harassment scenario)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmFyzVlBiR4 (quid pro quo SH scenario)

CO-5 FACTS FOR THIS DISCUSSION – DO NOT ADD OR ASSUME UNSTATED FACTS. ASSUME TH

CO-5
FACTS FOR THIS DISCUSSION – DO NOT ADD OR ASSUME UNSTATED FACTS.
ASSUME TH

CO-5
FACTS FOR THIS DISCUSSION – DO NOT ADD OR ASSUME UNSTATED FACTS.
ASSUME THE NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR WAS SITTING IN HIS YARD AND TOOK A VIDEO OF THE WHOLE THING, SO THE FACTS OF THIS HYPOTHETICAL AS RELATED CAN BE PROVED IN COURT.
Victor Tremont has a classic muscle car that he fixed up and has enjoyed drag racing. He has kept it well maintained. Much as he loves the car, Victor finds himself in need of cash. He parks the car on his front yard, with a large sign on the windshield that says, “Cherry of a classic car, For Sale $4,900 or Best Offer. AS-IS.”
Gloria Goget drives by and sees the car. She is immediately enamored and stops to look at it. She is sure the car is worth more than the asking price. When she knocks on the front door, there is no response; she looks around, and decides nobody is home, so she takes her business card and on the back writes, ” I will pay you $5,500 cash for your classic car.” She signs her name, and dates it, including the time, and slips the card onto the windshield of the car under the wiper blade.
About a half hour later, Victor returns. He does not see Gloria’s card because he does not walk around and look at the car. A few minutes after he is home, his buddy, Levi Lord, pulls in to look at the car. Levi has always liked the car and has gone racing with Victor. Levi offers Victor $5,000 even for the car, and Victor accepts. The two men shake hands on the deal. Victor goes in the house to get the car title while Levi writes out a check to Victor for $5,000.
Victor comes out with the title in his hand. As Levi starts to hand him the check, Gloria pulls in. She has an envelope of $5,500 cash for the car. Victor says to Gloria,”sorry, but I have just sold the car to Levi here.” Gloria objects and says she already offered $5,500 earlier.
When Victor says, “No, you didn’t,” she marches him to the car and shows him her card.
“There is my offer, I already left you before. You weren’t home and now I have the money right here,” she said.
Victor turns to Levi, “Sorry, she did leave this offer, I’m going to sell it to her for more money.”
Levi objects, stating, “You just said you already sold it to ME. We shook hands on it. You cannot back out now just because some card was floating around no one knew about. She wasn’t even here! She’s a loser too late!”
While the three of them stand in the yard arguing, Jack Bucksworthy drives in the yard. He gets out of his Cadillac, looks at the muscle car, and moseys over to the three arguing people. He asks, “who owns that hot rod for sale?”
“I do,” says Victor.
“No, I do,” says Levi.
“It’s MY Car,” snaps Gloria.
“I’ll pay whichever of you, $8,000 for that car,” says Jack, “but only if the engine starts.”
Victor answers, “Of course it starts. I accept your offer.”
Levi hollers, “NO! That car is no longer for sale! I bought it! It’s mine! I’m not selling it!” (Waving the check in Victor’s face.)
Gloria stomps over to the muscle car, grabs the sign off it, and sits on the hood. “It’s my car. I was here before all of you and I have real money in hand.” she yells, waving her envelope over her head.
Victor says to Jack,” Pay no attention to them. I have the title — right here. My car. Let’s start the car.”
DISCUSSION PROMPT:
YOU BE THE JUDGE. DECIDE WHO GETS THE CAR.
USING THE ABOVE FACTS, DISCUSS AND ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
identify the contract issues you see here.
Applying common law principles of contract, who gets the car, if anyone, and for how much? Explain your reasoning using the definitions and principles of contract provided in Lessons, required readings and any other research you do.
In terms of making an offer, what is the legal significance of Jack Bucksworthy’s statement, “only if the engine starts?”

CO-5 FACTS FOR THIS DISCUSSION – DO NOT ADD OR ASSUME UNSTATED FACTS. ASSUME THE

CO-5
FACTS FOR THIS DISCUSSION – DO NOT ADD OR ASSUME UNSTATED FACTS.
ASSUME THE

CO-5
FACTS FOR THIS DISCUSSION – DO NOT ADD OR ASSUME UNSTATED FACTS.
ASSUME THE NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR WAS SITTING IN HIS YARD AND TOOK A VIDEO OF THE WHOLE THING, SO THE FACTS OF THIS HYPOTHETICAL AS RELATED CAN BE PROVED IN COURT.
Victor Tremont has a classic muscle car that he fixed up and has enjoyed drag racing. He has kept it well maintained. Much as he loves the car, Victor finds himself in need of cash. He parks the car on his front yard, with a large sign on the windshield that says, “Cherry of a classic car, For Sale $4,900 or Best Offer. AS-IS.”
Gloria Goget drives by and sees the car. She is immediately enamored and stops to look at it. She is sure the car is worth more than the asking price. When she knocks on the front door, there is no response; she looks around, and decides nobody is home, so she takes her business card and on the back writes, ” I will pay you $5,500 cash for your classic car.” She signs her name, and dates it, including the time, and slips the card onto the windshield of the car under the wiper blade.
About a half hour later, Victor returns. He does not see Gloria’s card because he does not walk around and look at the car. A few minutes after he is home, his buddy, Levi Lord, pulls in to look at the car. Levi has always liked the car and has gone racing with Victor. Levi offers Victor $5,000 even for the car, and Victor accepts. The two men shake hands on the deal. Victor goes in the house to get the car title while Levi writes out a check to Victor for $5,000.
Victor comes out with the title in his hand. As Levi starts to hand him the check, Gloria pulls in. She has an envelope of $5,500 cash for the car. Victor says to Gloria,”sorry, but I have just sold the car to Levi here.” Gloria objects and says she already offered $5,500 earlier.
When Victor says, “No, you didn’t,” she marches him to the car and shows him her card.
“There is my offer, I already left you before. You weren’t home and now I have the money right here,” she said.
Victor turns to Levi, “Sorry, she did leave this offer, I’m going to sell it to her for more money.”
Levi objects, stating, “You just said you already sold it to ME. We shook hands on it. You cannot back out now just because some card was floating around no one knew about. She wasn’t even here! She’s a loser too late!”
While the three of them stand in the yard arguing, Jack Bucksworthy drives in the yard. He gets out of his Cadillac, looks at the muscle car, and moseys over to the three arguing people. He asks, “who owns that hot rod for sale?”
“I do,” says Victor.
“No, I do,” says Levi.
“It’s MY Car,” snaps Gloria.
“I’ll pay whichever of you, $8,000 for that car,” says Jack, “but only if the engine starts.”
Victor answers, “Of course it starts. I accept your offer.”
Levi hollers, “NO! That car is no longer for sale! I bought it! It’s mine! I’m not selling it!” (Waving the check in Victor’s face.)
Gloria stomps over to the muscle car, grabs the sign off it, and sits on the hood. “It’s my car. I was here before all of you and I have real money in hand.” she yells, waving her envelope over her head.
Victor says to Jack,” Pay no attention to them. I have the title — right here. My car. Let’s start the car.”
DISCUSSION PROMPT:
YOU BE THE JUDGE. DECIDE WHO GETS THE CAR.
USING THE ABOVE FACTS, DISCUSS AND ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
identify the contract issues you see here.
Applying common law principles of contract, who gets the car, if anyone, and for how much? Explain your reasoning using the definitions and principles of contract provided in Lessons, required readings and any other research you do.
In terms of making an offer, what is the legal significance of Jack Bucksworthy’s statement, “only if the engine starts?”

? Please follow the following instructions. Make it in ESL language, please. Pl

? Please follow the following instructions. Make it in ESL language, please.
Pl

? Please follow the following instructions. Make it in ESL language, please.
Please select two of the following questions and compose an essay of at least 1200 words for each question. Please compose a essay. Outlines or bullet points, however detailed, will not be accepted. An essay of less than 1200 words will not be accepted.
You may organize and present your answer in whatever fashion you believe would be most effective. You do not have to present your answer to mirror the question. Just say what needs to be said. We will discuss the questions in class, and I will be pleased to help in any way that I can before the exam is due. Just contact me and I will try to help.
1. Discuss the law of intellectual property. What are the major categories of the law?
How do they operate to protect intellectual property? Are there significant problems with this category of the law that you can identify?
2. Two of the basic forms or structures by which businesses are organized are the partnership and the corporation. Both may share some similarities, but the differences have been our focus. Select what you consider to be the most important criteria of comparison and compare and contrast these two forms of organizations. In addition, please comment on the advantages and disadvantages of each form. Are there any significant reforms that you believe should be made in the law concerning these two forms?
3. Contract law is obviously a basic component of the law regulating the conduct of business. What are the required elements of a valid contract? What purposes are served by these requirements? How are breaches of contract treated by the law?
Select some relevant examples and illustrate some of the ways in which contract law regulates property relationships and business organizations.
4. Tort law constitutes a basic component of the law regulating business. Explain the legal grounds for tort liability. What kinds of behavior create tort liability? How is tort liability ascertained and processed by courts? What purposes are served by defining these categories of liability? Select some relevant examples and illustrate some of the ways in which tort law regulates property relationships and business organizations.
5. Individuals own real property according to various legal classifications or categories.
We distinguish between possessory and non-possessory interests. Please describe the various categories of possessory and non-possessory interests. How are they similar?
How are they different? How are they related to each other? Explain possessory and non-possessory interests.
6. Real property can be transferred in a variety of ways. These include:
contract of sale deeds
secured transactions adverse possession
public and private controls decedents’ estates
Discuss these methods of transferring property. What are their features? How are they similar? How are they different?

? Please follow the following instructions. Make it in ESL language, please. Pl

? Please follow the following instructions. Make it in ESL language, please.
Pl

? Please follow the following instructions. Make it in ESL language, please.
Please select two of the following questions and compose an essay of at least 1200 words for each question. Please compose a essay. Outlines or bullet points, however detailed, will not be accepted. An essay of less than 1200 words will not be accepted.
You may organize and present your answer in whatever fashion you believe would be most effective. You do not have to present your answer to mirror the question. Just say what needs to be said. We will discuss the questions in class, and I will be pleased to help in any way that I can before the exam is due. Just contact me and I will try to help.
1. Discuss the law of intellectual property. What are the major categories of the law?
How do they operate to protect intellectual property? Are there significant problems with this category of the law that you can identify?
2. Two of the basic forms or structures by which businesses are organized are the partnership and the corporation. Both may share some similarities, but the differences have been our focus. Select what you consider to be the most important criteria of comparison and compare and contrast these two forms of organizations. In addition, please comment on the advantages and disadvantages of each form. Are there any significant reforms that you believe should be made in the law concerning these two forms?
3. Contract law is obviously a basic component of the law regulating the conduct of business. What are the required elements of a valid contract? What purposes are served by these requirements? How are breaches of contract treated by the law?
Select some relevant examples and illustrate some of the ways in which contract law regulates property relationships and business organizations.
4. Tort law constitutes a basic component of the law regulating business. Explain the legal grounds for tort liability. What kinds of behavior create tort liability? How is tort liability ascertained and processed by courts? What purposes are served by defining these categories of liability? Select some relevant examples and illustrate some of the ways in which tort law regulates property relationships and business organizations.
5. Individuals own real property according to various legal classifications or categories.
We distinguish between possessory and non-possessory interests. Please describe the various categories of possessory and non-possessory interests. How are they similar?
How are they different? How are they related to each other? Explain possessory and non-possessory interests.
6. Real property can be transferred in a variety of ways. These include:
contract of sale deeds
secured transactions adverse possession
public and private controls decedents’ estates
Discuss these methods of transferring property. What are their features? How are they similar? How are they different?

Read these articles. They are about three highly publicized incidents where acti

Read these articles. They are about three highly publicized incidents where acti

Read these articles. They are about three highly publicized incidents where actions by employees forced each company to take a drastic and unusual action. As you read, think about the ethics of what is happening. Then in 1-2 sentences per number, answer the questions. Spelling and grammar count. There must be at least one text reference (chapter/section/edition).
There is no right or wrong answer. There is only a complete answer that is supported by a complete reference to the text.
Download Houston Doctor Fired over Covid Vaccines
Actions
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/10/us/houston-doctor-fired-covid-vaccine.html?action=click&module=RelatedLinks&pgtype=ArticleLinks to an external site.
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a60167400/caterpillar-william-barr-trump-justicedepartment/Links to an external site.
Caterpillar Tax Problems Disappear-1.pdf
Actions
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/phony-bank-accounts-resurface-wells-fargo-twist-rcna98005Links to an external site.
Wells Fargo Accused In a New Fake Accounts Scandal.docx
Actions
1. Do you think Dr. Gokal was acting ethically in the way he administered the vaccine? Why?
2. Should the doctors disclose this event to anyone and, if so, to whom? Why?
3. Read the article on Caterpillar. Who do you see exhibited unethical behavior? Explain?
4. Think about the Approaches to Ethical Reasoning, such as Duty-Based Ethics, Outcome Based Ethics etc. . Which approach did Judge Bynum use in regards to the vaccine situation? Which approach should have be used in the case of Wells Fargo in the face of multiple violations? Explain?

Read these articles. They are about three highly publicized incidents where acti

Read these articles. They are about three highly publicized incidents where acti

Read these articles. They are about three highly publicized incidents where actions by employees forced each company to take a drastic and unusual action. As you read, think about the ethics of what is happening. Then in 1-2 sentences per number, answer the questions. Spelling and grammar count. There must be at least one text reference (chapter/section/edition).
There is no right or wrong answer. There is only a complete answer that is supported by a complete reference to the text.
Download Houston Doctor Fired over Covid Vaccines
Actions
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/10/us/houston-doctor-fired-covid-vaccine.html?action=click&module=RelatedLinks&pgtype=ArticleLinks to an external site.
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a60167400/caterpillar-william-barr-trump-justicedepartment/Links to an external site.
Caterpillar Tax Problems Disappear-1.pdf
Actions
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/phony-bank-accounts-resurface-wells-fargo-twist-rcna98005Links to an external site.
Wells Fargo Accused In a New Fake Accounts Scandal.docx
Actions
1. Do you think Dr. Gokal was acting ethically in the way he administered the vaccine? Why?
2. Should the doctors disclose this event to anyone and, if so, to whom? Why?
3. Read the article on Caterpillar. Who do you see exhibited unethical behavior? Explain?
4. Think about the Approaches to Ethical Reasoning, such as Duty-Based Ethics, Outcome Based Ethics etc. . Which approach did Judge Bynum use in regards to the vaccine situation? Which approach should have be used in the case of Wells Fargo in the face of multiple violations? Explain?

1) Describe your thoughts and viewpoints after watching the TEDx video on “How S

1) Describe your thoughts and viewpoints after watching the TEDx video on “How S

1) Describe your thoughts and viewpoints after watching the TEDx video on “How Smart Contracts will change the world”
https://www.ted.com/talks/olga_mack_how_smart_contracts_will_change_the_worldLinks to an external site.
2) Kuhn Farm Machinery Inc. (Defendant) is headquartered in France, where it manufactures farm machinery. On February 9, 1990, the Defendant contracted with 7200 Scottsdale Rd (Plaintiff) to use the Plaintiff’s resort facilities for its North American dealers convention. The agreement required the resort to reserve a block of 180 guests rooms and banquet and meeting rooms for March 26 to March 31, 1991. If defendant canceled the meeting, it was required to pay liquidated damages to the resort. The defendant invited its top 200 dealers from North America as well as overseas, primarily European personnel. The defendant considered the European overseas personnel crucial to the presentation and success of the meeting. On January 16, 1991, the United States and allied forces in operation Desert Storm invaded Iraq. Discovering that apparently because of the threat of terrorism, conference attendance would not meet expectations, defendant canceled the convention. The Plaintiff sued for the liquidated damage amount. Among other defenses, the defendant asserted the doctrine of frustration of purpose. Who wins and Why?