Calculate a GS rating for a position in your organization. Write a brief job sum
Calculate a GS rating for a position in your organization. Write a brief job summary (see Sylvia and Meyer pg. 152-155) and using the GS rating process (see primary standards, Sylvia and Meyer pg.181-192). Determine a GS rating include levels, points and brief level descriptions in your final report.
This assignment requires you to write a case study of the following decision:
R
This assignment requires you to write a case study of the following decision: R v Turnbull [1977] QB 224 You should have particular reference to more recent case law including specifically R v Malkinson [2023] EWCA Crim 954
Criteria for Assessment
1. This case summary should include:
• Introduction. Introduce the case and its legal significance. • Facts. The facts should be kept as brief as possible. State the facts simply, clearly and in the order events occurred. • Decision. This should, again, be as brief as possible but should include the main findings of the court or tribunal, together with any relevant extracts from the findings which explain how and why the court or tribunal came to that decision.
• Analysis. This is the most important part. You must critically analyse the decision of this case in the context of the law relating to the admissibility of identification evidence. It gives you an opportunity to critically assess the significance of the decision in the relevant legal area (including its impact on previous, or subsequent case law, and to comment on and criticise the decision in the light of various opinions and theories, which relate to that area of law and the impact it has today. 2. Please note: • Summarise the case in your own words. You can use quotations if they are important but keep these to a minimum. We are looking to see how well you understand the case, its context and significance.
• Please make sure this is referenced properly • Make sure you proofread your work. We will be assessing grammar and punctuation as well as your ability to correctly summarise this reported case. Word Count
The word count is 2000.
There will be a penalty of a deduction of 10% of the mark (after internal moderation) for work exceeding the word limit by 10% or more.
The word limit includes quotations and citations, but excludes the references list.
Marking and Feedback
What will I be marked against?
Details of the marking criteria for this task can be found at the bottom of this assignment brief. Assessed Module Learning Outcomes
The Learning Outcomes for this module align to the marking criteria which can be found at the end of this brief. Ensure you understand the marking criteria to ensure successful achievement of the assessment task. The following module learning outcomes are assessed in this task:
Learning Outcomes This assignment is designed to assess the following learning outcomes:
• Critically review the historical development of and principles underlying the law of evidence.
• Identify, apply and evaluate the rules of evidence and relevant case law.
• Undertake extensive legal research and consolidate this research in order to respond appropriately to assessment tasks.
• Critically evaluate proposals for reform where appropriate.
This is the assignment brief. Use a few articles and cases but dont over do the references.
Make Sure to add a bibliography.
This is a key assignment and it’s very important I receive top marks.
Please aim to achieve a first. Aim for around 75-80%
Choose one or more key topics covered in the course, then research and discuss t
Choose one or more key topics covered in the course, then research and discuss thoroughly. History, application, important cases, etc. may be included.
Topic – Homicide in United States
First explain what is Homicide. Talk about different type of homicide. for instance – first degree murder, second degree murder, third degree murder, voluntary manslaughter, and involuntary manslaughter.
Then move on to Statistics of homicide in the US. Give your own analysis on Homicide. Talk about how we can decrease homicide rates? Talk about which state have the most homicide? which age group/ ethnicity/gender commits the most homicide in the US? what can we do to reduce the rates.
Then talk about 4 past cases related to homicide and how it impacted criminal law.
conclude with your own analysis what did you learn and how the laws can be more strict on homicide?
90% of the paper should be analysis of your own words only 10% should be outside sources.
Purpose: The graded activity is to help you think about and process the course
Purpose: The graded activity is to help you think about and process the course materials in a way that promotes creative and critical thinking, as well as active learning. The activities are to ensure that you are getting maximum involvement with the course material. This document details the requirements for completion of the graded activities, a grading rubric, and an example.
A total of five (5) activities are required and represent approximately 20 to30 minutes of work. Excel must be used to produce this assignment. All WGA submitted as Word or PDF will receive an automatic grade of zero.
Attend class, ask questions, and make note of pertinent information; e.g. definitions/explanation of terms or concepts not already familiar with
Read assigned chapter, highlight challenging/difficult concepts that can be added to the study sheet
Consolidate the information gathered from attending class and reading the chapter and prepare the Excel study sheet
Excel must be used, construct the three columns
Add as many rows as necessary to broadly summarize assigned readings and lecture material (minimum of 5 rows)
Rows and columns should be left justified, not centered
Include the column headers provided in the template below
Ensure the headers are bold font
Font should be no larger than 12
Finished study sheet must be a minimum of one (1) page
The end product should result in a study sheet for quizzes, midterms, and the final exam.
Your boss is concerned that your department may have been negligent in the injur
Your boss is concerned that your department may have been negligent in the injury of a spectator. He has asked you to write a response explaining what constitutes negligence and how the organization can avoid any hint of negligence in the future.
Your assignment should be 3 – 5 pages in length, formatted following APA standard guidelines (double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman).
Text Book: Carpenter, L.J. (2014). Legal concepts in sport: A primer (4th ed.). Urbana, IL: Sagamore Publishing.
For Unit 2, please read
Chapter 5: Negligence: “Oops!”
Chapter 6: Defusing Negligence Liability
Chapter 14: Defusing Liability: Managing the Risks
Additional Material
In this module, we learned about modern block ciphers.
Please research a recent
In this module, we learned about modern block ciphers.
Please research a recent (2020 or newer) attack, preferably one from inside the United States, which was in the news and involved encryption or message confidentiality. Please select an attack that you or someone else in this course has not used in any discussion board postings.
For this discussion, please answer the following questions:
What is the real-world scenario you selected? Please provide a link to the article that you found.
What type of attack was involved and what happened in this incident?
Describe the exact type of attack, how it was launched, what systems were affected, and for how long did it last.
What was the monetary value in terms of cost of loss to whomever was attacked?
What did the organization’s security team do to respond to the incident?
What, if anything, would you have done differently to respond to this event?
In today’s world, are block ciphers strong enough to defend against sophisticated attacks such as that from a nation-state actor using AI and/or very large-scale computing power to break it? What is a real-world example of one such attack from a nation-state actor that has occurred since 2020?
***I’ve attached my previous current event assignments as not to use the same topic when constructing this paper.***
Characterize the average victim and average stalker involved in cyberstalking. W
Characterize the average victim and average stalker involved in cyberstalking. What are the most typical ways that stalkers engage in cyberstalking? Responses typed, using a standard font, 12-point type size, double-spaced, with overall neatness and readability, as well as restatement of the question and question number. Do not include embedded links in your writing assignments.
The book needed to complete this essay is
Cases and Materials on Criminal Law b
The book needed to complete this essay is Cases and Materials on Criminal Law by Joshua Dressler and Garvey, 9th ed. West Pub. 2022. ISBN: 978-1647087708
Fully answer all of the following questions. Give reasoned answers in essay form (not bullet points or lists). The expectation is that the exam in total should be between 8-12 pages (based on past similar exams) but that is just a guesstimate. Answers will be graded on analysis of the issues and concepts needed to deal with the hypotheticals. Do your own work — the assignment will be uploaded via SafeAssign, so if you quote something, an in-text citation is OK. 1. a. Read the Greenwalt article from the Dressler text pp. 34-35 and answer questions 1 and 2 on p. 36
b. Read and fully answer Question 4 from p. 42 of the Dressler text.
c . Read Coker v. Georgia from pp. 76-81 and fully answer Questions 1 and 2 from pp. 81-82.
2. a. Discuss causation and its various concepts as discussed in class and the text.
b. In addition, answer the following hypotheticals:
Who is at fault for Y, D, and F’s deaths, and why in the following hypotheticals? Give a reasoned answer using the concepts of causation covered in class and the text.
Hypothetical Facts: X and Y steal property from Z’s riverfront home. The thieves fled in a boat. Z fires two shots at the boat, seeking (unlawfully) to kill or scare them. i. X, fearful of another shot, dives into the water causing the boat to capsize. Y drowns.
ii. The boat – now unmanned – drifts a ½ mile downstream and over a waterfall striking D and killing her as well. Discuss the causation issues and who might be criminally culpable in this scenario. iii. B nearly drowns and is rescued by a passerby (E), who puts him in his car to get him to the hospital. E is intoxicated and crashes the vehicle killing Y and bicyclist F.
3. Do the Problems from Question 2 (A-F) on p. 236 in the Dressler text. Explain the reasoning in your answers and explore the possibilities available.
4. Fully analyze the following problems.
a. Smith, a pedestrian, was struck by a car while walking in a crosswalk and was seriously injured. Jones was driving the car that hit Smith. An ambulance was called to the scene, and Smith was rushed immediately to the hospital. Unfortunately, all of this occurred amid a heavy snowstorm, and on the way to the hospital, the ambulance hit a patch of ice and careened off the road killing the ambulance driver, the EMT, and Smith. Jones has been charged with homicide in the deaths of all three crash victims. Is she guilty of these alleged crimes? Fully explain why or why not.
b. Burr, in a jealous rage, shot his victim, Hamilton, twice in the head after he saw Hamilton flirting with his girlfriend. When Hamilton reached the hospital, his heart was still beating, but he had suffered irreversible brain damage and loss of brain function (as evidenced by EEG and other medical evidence). Hamilton’s family agreed to have his artificial ventilation turned off (it was keeping his heart beating) so his organs could be harvested for transplantation.
Burr is charged with first-degree murder in Hamilton’s death. His defense attorney argues that the doctors who disconnected Hamilton’s ventilator were the cause of his death — not Burr. Is the defense counsel correct — why or why not? What if Hamilton’s family refused treatment due to his religious convictions, and he subsequently died?
5. Consider the different standards of Mens Rea dealt with in the text and class. Answer Questions 1, 2, and 3 (and subparts) from p. 176-77 in the Dressler casebook. Explain the reasoning behind your answers. The Model Penal Code statute (MPC) is in the textbook.
In this exercise you have been assigned as the lead detective. You must review
In this exercise you have been assigned as the lead detective. You must review the following scenario as well as look up the listed criminal statutes at Florida online statutes.
Statutes to be reviewed: F.S.S. 812.014 Grand Theft
Copy and Paste the link for the Statute: http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?mode=View%20Statutes&SubMenu=1&App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=grand+theft&URL=0800-0899/0812/Sections/0812.014.html
Responding Officer Narrative:
On Monday 01/29/24, I responded to the area of East 6th Street and Magnolia Avenue, where he made contact with David Cuddy in reference to a report that his gold 2013 Chrysler Town & Country van, bearing Florida tag: EBW123, was stolen by an individual he only knew as “Ace.” Cuddy stated that he had met “Ace” within the last few weeks and that he allowed “Ace” to use the vehicle the previous day, for “Ace” to go to Walmart and spend time with his girlfriend. The only stipulation was that “Ace” return the vehicle in a reasonable time frame. Cuddy allowed “Ace” to have the vehicle on Sunday, 01/28/24, and filed the report after “Ace” hadn’t returned the vehicle on January 28, 2024. During the initial investigation, Cuddy signed an Affidavit of Prosecution for charges against “Ace” and stated he wished to pursue charges. Ofc. J. Thurman
Follow up report #1
I contacted Cuddy on Jan 31, 2024, to follow up with him in reference to his report. Cuddy came to the police department and provided me with several text messages shared between him and “Ace,” during which “Ace” confirmed he was in possession of the vehicle and continually made statements that he would return the vehicle soon and provided false locations where Cuddy’s vehicle was located in the local area.
Follow up report #2
On Feb. 04, 2024, DeFuniak Springs Police Department contacted our agency to advise that their agency recovered the vehicle stolen in this case. Cpl. L. Span took the report and ensured the vehicle was removed from FCIC/NCIC. The vehicle was impounded by DSPD to be recovered by Cuddy. Upon returning to work Monday, February 06, 2024, I contacted DSPD and spoke with Det. White provided me with information that Leslie Cohen was located in the passenger seat of the vehicle, which was parked at a motel in their city. The DSPD report stated that Cohen was not legally in possession of the vehicle as she did not have the keys, and they were not in the vehicle. Cohen was arrested on an oustanding warrant out of Bay County and was being extradited back this afternoon. I will make contact with her at the Bay County Jail to conduct an interview regarding this incident.
****ALSO SEE FILE IN MODULE FOR PHOTOS: they are attached*
There are 3 Parts to this assignment this is the first. The second part will be the Mock Interview Oral Competency portion that will take place in Module 9. The third part will be a critique and feedback discussion board in Module 10.
I. Rubric For Written Plan (5 points) You are to prepare a line of 10 to 15 questions to conduct an interview with the witness Ms. Leslie Cohen. You will want to obtain as much information in your line of questioning to help in identifying the perpetrator as well as meet the elements of the offenses you believe were committed. Written Plan: (5 points) should consist of an Outline Addressing the following Questions and uploaded in the submission area in Module
What initial steps will you take to build rapport with the witness? (.5) pts
What are the legal consideration in this situation? Ethical considerations? 1 pts
What oral communication strategies do you plan to use during the interview? 1 pts
How will you present yourself professionally during the interview? (.5) pts
What are the five most important items you need to determine during the interview and what 10-15 questions do you plan to ask to elicit the information? 2 pts
Respond to each questions include various sources, make sure to not use Al;
Man
Respond to each questions include various sources, make sure to not use Al;
Many police department use sting operations to enforce the criminal law regarding crimes such
as drugs and prostitution.
1. Evaluate when and how a sting operation may have crossed the line and become entrapment. That is to say explain in detsail and with hypothetical examples at what point a sting operation changes to entrapment.
2. Do you believe that such types of law enforcement should be abolished? Why or why not?
3. What do they think would happen if sting operations were abolished?
4. What about programs like “To Catch a Predator?