English - punditwritersbay.com

ANALYTICAL MOVIE REVIEW | VIDEO PRESENTATION (OF YOUR REVIEW) What is an analyti

ANALYTICAL MOVIE REVIEW | VIDEO PRESENTATION (OF YOUR REVIEW)
What is an analyti

ANALYTICAL MOVIE REVIEW | VIDEO PRESENTATION (OF YOUR REVIEW)
What is an analytical review of a movie?
An analytical film review goes one step further than a usual review. It briefly describes the film, evaluates it, and also analyzes the film by focusing on an interesting, significant or important area of the film, such as its theme, to explore in depth.
Steps for writing the review:
First, find a film that you want to review. This could be one that you simply loved, or one that you found problematic. Or both!
Second, watch the film a few times if you can, but do so at least once more if you have seen it before.
Third, write your review. Think about whether or not you will write a fantastic review, or a favorable review, or a poor review, or a scathing review. This will set the TONE of your review.
Next, who is your audience for this film? For example, if you are reviewing a Sci Fi film to a forum of Sci Fi lovers, keep in mind that they are well versed in your genre.
You should not rehash the entire plot, but instead give the most critical information about the film to the reader. Then, introduce the formal elements (narrative techniques, mise-en-scène (focus in on one or two parts: setting, the human figure, lighting, composition which includes framing), the cinematography and use of camera angles, shot selection, etc, hat you will be discussing. Your thesis should connect the elements you will discuss to their importance to the film as a whole, and then . . .
You will have an introduction, body, conclusion. Remember your reader needs to know the basics about the film – title, date, director, etc.
Finally, remember that this is a film review! Give your evaluative opinion of the film based on the points you chose to analyze for your analysis, Do you recommend it? Or not? And why?
Guidelines: Paper (75 pts)
Around 750 words
You will need a works cited or references page with at least the film properly cited. You may include other sources, but this is not a requirement.
MLA or APA formatting.
Presentation (25 pts)
Finally, you will give 5 minute presentation of your film review in Week 8. Choose the highlights from your review and rhetorically convince your audience that they should or should not see this film and the reason’s why. This is a much shorter version of the longer review so it is up to you to make your own rhetorical choices as to what to include or not.
To receive credit you your presentation you much be present all three days, unless you have a valid excuse.

At this point in the research process, you have identified a research question t

At this point in the research process, you have identified a research question that has guided your inquiry so far this semester. An annotated bibliography is an important genre in academic research because it helps you to keep track of the sources that you’ve found for your research project and evaluate the sources based on your research question. Annotated bibliographies may take different forms depending on the context. For this class, the annotated bibliography has two parts: the introduction and the source annotations.
Directions: Part 1: The Annotated Bibliography Introduction provides background information about your research topic, research question, and research process. An effective introduction will help your reader understand what you’ve been researching this semester, how you’ve been conducting research, and how you plan to use the sources you’ve found in your final research paper. Please note that the Critical Introduction is not the same document as your research plan (Writing Project 1), and it is not the introduction to your research paper.
Your annotated bibliography introduction should address the following questions:
What topic have you been researching this semester? Why is this topic significant?
What is your research question?
How did you investigate your research question? What search strategies did you use to locate sources (e.g. where did you look, what keywords did you use, what successes or challenges did you have?)
What types of sources did you find?
Based on your research, what is your tentative thesis, claim, or position?
How do you plan to use the sources you’ve found to support your tentative claim (e.g. what sources will you use to provide background information, to support your claim, refute your claim, etc.)?
What additional materials do you think you will need for your argumentative research paper?
Part 2: The Source Annotations provide a list of the sources you’ve found. You must include at least five sources for this assignment, and at least three of the sources must be peer-reviewed. Each entry should include a complete MLA or APA citation followed by a critical annotation (100-200 words). The annotation should summarize the source and evaluate the source based on its currency, authority, and relevance to your research project.
Your source annotations should address the following questions:
What is the complete MLA or APA citation for the source?
What is the source (e.g. is it for a scholarly or public audience, is it a book, journal article, blog post, website, video, etc.)?
Who created the source (e.g. who is the author, publisher, or organization)? How does the creator information impact this source’s appropriateness for your own research project?
What is the purpose of the source (e.g. is the purpose to inform, to persuade, to entertain, to sell, etc.)?
How would you summarize this source for someone who is not familiar with it?
How current is the source (e.g. when was it published, does the source reflect the most current understanding of the topic)? How does the currency impact this source’s appropriateness for your own research project?
How does the source relate to your own research project and your tentative claim?

3 different Essays – Make sure that you reference the Milestones, you need to ba

3 different Essays – Make sure that you reference the Milestones, you need to basically do an extension of the Milestones. Upload 3 separate documents and MLA 9th formatting is critical for title Page, intext citations as well as for the Work Cited Page. Each document will have 6 sources.

The subject and education level of this question. ” style=”width: 175px; height:

The subject and education level of this question.
” style=”width: 175px; height:

The subject and education level of this question.
” style=”width: 175px; height: 36px; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center;” rel=”width: 175px; height: 36px; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center;” rel=”width: 175px; height: 36px; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center;” rel=”width: 175px; height: 36px; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center;”>Argument
Introduction to the Assignment: For this project, you will argue a position by providing reasons and evidence for your position. The purpose of this assignment is to argue an issue that is likely to affect your audience of your peers and community members. Selecting a relevant topic ensures that you can build common ground with your audience and more effectively establish pathos.
You will need to be able to write about this topic from a personal perspective. If you are already intending on relying on research, your argument will fail. Arguments rely upon personal reasoning and not facts. Evidence is the factual content, so the majority of the essay will be what you think. If your essay sounds like what Claude/ChatGPT thinks—you can imagine how that will go.
Your purpose is to argue your perspective: how should AI be used in your field, if at all? Again, remember that your goal is to argue what you think.
(I want to argue that AI should be used in my field as a Physician Assistant)
Come up with a good title for the essay.
Genre Basics: Arguing a position requires you to use logos (well-explained reasoning and evidence). You should also provide background information and appeals to ethos and pathos. To craft a well-rounded argument, you need to consider other positions in a counterargument paragraph. Be clear about what specific response you want readers to have to your argument by crafting a thoughtful and engaging introduction and conclusion. This is often called the “call to action.”
It needs to include an Introduction, 3 body paragraphs for each source I’ll share, a counterargument paragraph, and finally a conclusion.
Requirements:
1.1500 words at the bare minimum. You should explain ideas in depth. Word counts are a minimum requirement.
2. Original and convincing reasoning (based on your perception). You will need to use strategies presented in Chapter 19.
3. Smoothly integrate and cite sources within body paragraphs; the source information should support your reasoning within each paragraph. Ensure that your sources are credible. Unreliable sources will not count and will affect your ethos as a writer.
Three credible sources need to be used as evidence in the essay. You can use more sources.
4. Remember that reasonable argumentation requires you to acknowledge alternate viewpoints (a counterargument).
5. MLA formatting.
6. Remember conventional essay formatting: introduction, body paragraphs that coherently transition from one idea to the next, a counterargument paragraph, and a conclusion.
I added a file with all the information and the sources! For source 3, I added the entire source since I wasn’t sure if the website would work!
Please try not to use any type of AI!!
Thank you!!

I need an essay written with my thesis statement and topic sentences that has bo

I need an essay written with my thesis statement and topic sentences that has both direct and indirect quotes. MLA format. This is my thesis statement and my topic sentences that I turned in last week.
Thesis statement: Still relevant today, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I have a Dream” speech, effectively proves logical reasoning and evidence to fight for civil rights, using historical, statistical, and ethical appeals to strengthen his points.
Topic Sentence 1: In his “I Have a Dream” speech, Dr. King uses historical references, such as the Emancipation Proclamation, to get his point across about the ongoing struggle for freedom and injustice that is faced by African Americans, therefore giving a logical foundation to his speech.
Topic Sentence 2: By utilizing statistic evidence of economic and social injustices, Dr. King highlights the urgent need for civil rights reform, which logically demonstrates that the fight for equal rights is not only moral, but a societal issue as well.
Topic Sentence 3: The structure of Dr. King’s highlighted points stands the test of time because his vision for justice and equality continues to impact modern society.

Context Throughout the first half of this course, you have been introduced to k

Context
Throughout the first half of this course, you have been introduced to key rhetorical concepts such as kairos, the rhetorical situation, and salience. You have applied these concepts to your writing and thinking, both in your weekly Kairos Journal entries and in your major assignments.
As we reach the midpoint of the semester, it’s important to pause and reflect on your learning journey so far. This Midterm Reflection assignment is an opportunity for you to consider how your understanding of rhetoric has developed and how you’ve applied course concepts to your work.
Purpose
The purpose of the Midterm Reflection is for you to critically examine your learning in the first half of the course, demonstrating your understanding of key rhetorical concepts and their application to your writing and thinking.
This assignment allows you to identify moments of insight, analyze your growth as a writer and thinker, and consider how you might apply your learning to upcoming assignments and projects. By engaging in self-reflection, you’ll gain a deeper understanding of your intellectual journey and set goals for the remainder of the course.
Audience
The primary audience for your Midterm Reflection me, your instructor, who will assess your understanding and application of course concepts, as well as your ability to engage in meaningful self-reflection. While your classmates will not read your reflection, you may choose to discuss your insights and experiences with them to foster a collaborative learning environment.
Genre
A reflective essay is a type of writing that explores your personal experiences, thoughts, and feelings about a particular topic or event.
In this case, your Midterm Reflection should focus on your learning in the first half of the course, analyzing how your understanding of key rhetorical concepts has developed and how you’ve applied these concepts to your writing and thinking. Your reflection should be introspective, thoughtful, and well-supported by specific examples from your work and course readings.
Requirements
To complete this assignment, follow these steps:
Review your Kairos Journal entries and major assignments completed in the first half of the semester.Note: Consistent participation in the Kairos Journal (i.e., completing all weekly entries) is required to pass this assignment. Missing more than three entries will result in a failing grade, regardless of the quality of completed entries.
Write a thoughtful reflection (300-600 words) that:Identifies key moments of learning or insight from the course so far
Analyzes how your understanding of kairos, audience, and rhetoric has developed
Discusses how you’ve applied course concepts to your writing and thinking
Considers how you might apply your learning to upcoming assignments and projects
Include specific examples from your work and course readings to support your reflection.
Format your issue proposal following these guidelines:
300-600 words
Double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font
1-inch margins
MLA format for in-text citations
Submission Requirements
Submit your Midterm Reflection as a Word document (.doc or .docx) or PDF file to this assignment page. Late submissions will be penalized according to the course policy listed in the Syllabus.
Evaluation Criteria
Mid-Term Reflections will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
Depth of Reflection and Self Analysis
Understanding of Course Concepts Covered in First Half of Course
Quality of Examples and Connections to Course Material
Insight into Personal Growth and Goals for the Rest of the Semester
Writing quality and organization

I want to write about UVA’s role in the desegregation of American higher educati

I want to write about UVA’s role in the desegregation of American higher education. In the 1950s, Gregory Swanson became the first African American admitted to the university’s law school after a court ruling that ended segregation at Virginia’s public institutions. I’m inspired by his courage and want to follow in his footsteps

At this point in the research process, you have identified a research question t

Please identify and choose an example of promotional writing and analyse it crit

Please identify and choose an example of promotional writing and analyse it critically according to selected rhetorical principles and persuasion theories. Assessment Criteria (Please refer to marking rubrics below) The assignment will be assessed according to the following criteria: • Critical ability to evaluate the promotional writing example • Application of relevant communication / advertising theories covered in lectures and readings • Written communication skills i.e. grammar, spelling, style, logical coherent argument • Information content of the answer i.e. avoid one word answers Instructions Find a written example of promotional writing in English (i.e. it can be a sales letter; a flyer, a leaflet; a brochure; an email broadcast; an advertisement; an annual report; a website/page, etc.) and analyze it by referring to the following questions: 1. What makes this an example of promotional writing? 2. What is the creative concept being adopted in this piece and how well is it being executed? Can you reconstruct the creative concept likely involved? 3. Which organization, service or person is this promotional writing example working for, and is it playing a role in the overall Integrated Marketing Communication process of the organization concerned? How? 4. Who are the intended audience of the piece? Can you identify their key characteristics – demographically and psychographically? What are their needs, interests, and concerns? Why would they be interested in this promotional message? 5. What motivational appeals (see Maslow’s hierarchy of needs) does this persuasive message use to raise awareness amongst its audiences and to sustain their interest? 6. What is/are the key promotional messages? What are the main points that the example is making and how are these being framed? 7. How well are the headline and body of the copy developed judged by length, conciseness and word choice? Which particular aspect of the writing you appreciate the most from this example? Do you have any suggestion on making them better? 8. How do the visual elements of your chosen piece help to supplement the text in communicating the message? Do the colors, typography and graphic elements adopted reflect a high standard in visual communications? 9. How does this piece rate in terms of overall style, clarity, tone, sentence length and structure, wordiness, use of jargon, puffery and stereotyping?

1000 Short Answer Assignment • This is worth 20% of your final grade • Submit to

1000 Short Answer Assignment
• This is worth 20% of your final grade
• Submit to

1000 Short Answer Assignment
• This is worth 20% of your final grade
• Submit to me by email
• The subject heading should read “Short Answer Assignment Writing 1000”
o Be sure to give your section letter as well: A or H
• Attach the assignment as either a Word doc. or PDF (no Google Docs)
This assignment tests your awareness of the academic genre by asking you to respond to a short answer topic precisely and succinctly. The length of the assignment should be 1 page minimum (typed and double-spaced). Below, I have given you a few topics to choose from. Pick two topics to answer. As well, down below, I’ve attached a sample answer, so that you have a very clear model for what I expect.
Be aware that the sample assignment has been formatted accorded to MLA guidelines (but you can choose to format it in APA if you like). As you can see, this isn’t really an essay assignment, but I do expect your writing to be well-constructed and to contain few punctuation or grammar mistakes. Remember to include both in-text citations and a final citation at the end of your piece. I would like to see that your answer contains summary, paraphrase, and/or quotations as needed. (These might be new skills for you, but try your best.) Remember to be specific. Remember to stay focused on what the author (in this case, Regal) has to say.
IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS, JUST ASK.
I’m here to help.
Short answer topics:
1. Using Brian Regal’s article, explain Grover Krantz’s Gigantopithecus theory.
2. Using Brian Regal’s article, describe the problems Grover Krantz encountered when trying to publish his research.
3. Using Brian Regal’s article, discuss the problem with supposed Bigfoot tracks.
Writing 1000
Short Answer Assignment
Using Brian Regal’s article, identify the other cryptozoologists working at the same time as Grover Krantz and describe their role in the hunt for Bigfoot.
In “Entering Dubious Realms,” Brian Regal identifies several of Grover Krantz’s contemporaries in the hunt for Bigfoot. In my response, I will briefly describe the roles they played in attempting to discover this probably non-existent primate. To begin, unlike most of the other so-called cryptozoologists, Krantz was a professionally trained anthropologist with a doctorate. Regal mentions that “amateurs were normally wary of professionals” (88), but two cryptozoologists were also professionally trained: namely, Ivan Sanderson and Bernard Heuvelmans. They appeared to offer some respectability to the field. As well, Regal mentions Carleton Coon, another trained anthropologist, but he only “dabbled in the field” (89). However, most of the people involved in the hunt for Bigfoot were not professional scientists. Of these, Regal mentions Roger Patterson who filmed “the contentious” Patterson-Gimlin film (90). Another was the Canadian journalist John Green whose book On the Tracks of the Sasquatch (published in 1968) was a study of the elusive creature. Regal writes of Ivan Marx and Paul Freeman, who supplied Krantz with casts of footprints, and yet who were accused hoaxers (91). In the same paragraph, Regal discusses René Dahinden, another Canadian cryptozoologist. Krantz’s relationship with Dahinden seems to have been stormy. Regal quotes Dahinden as claiming that Kranz’s work was “so dumb and stupid it boggles the mind” (p. 91). One of Regal’s main concerns in the article is that in his pursuit of Bigfoot, Krantz ran into difficulty not only with other academics in the field of anthropology but also with amateurs in the field of cryptozoology.

Works Cited
Regal, Brian. “Entering Dubious Realms: Grover Krantz, Science, and Sasquatch.” Annals of Science, vol. 66, no. 1, 2009, pp. 83-102.