Category: English

1000 Short Answer Assignment
• This is worth 20% of your final grade
• Submit to

1000 Short Answer Assignment
• This is worth 20% of your final grade
• Submit to me by email
• The subject heading should read “Short Answer Assignment Writing 1000”
o Be sure to give your section letter as well: A or H
• Attach the assignment as either a Word doc. or PDF (no Google Docs)
This assignment tests your awareness of the academic genre by asking you to respond to a short answer topic precisely and succinctly. The length of the assignment should be 1 page minimum (typed and double-spaced). Below, I have given you a few topics to choose from. Pick two topics to answer. As well, down below, I’ve attached a sample answer, so that you have a very clear model for what I expect.
Be aware that the sample assignment has been formatted accorded to MLA guidelines (but you can choose to format it in APA if you like). As you can see, this isn’t really an essay assignment, but I do expect your writing to be well-constructed and to contain few punctuation or grammar mistakes. Remember to include both in-text citations and a final citation at the end of your piece. I would like to see that your answer contains summary, paraphrase, and/or quotations as needed. (These might be new skills for you, but try your best.) Remember to be specific. Remember to stay focused on what the author (in this case, Regal) has to say.
IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS, JUST ASK.
I’m here to help.
Short answer topics:
1. Using Brian Regal’s article, explain Grover Krantz’s Gigantopithecus theory.
2. Using Brian Regal’s article, describe the problems Grover Krantz encountered when trying to publish his research.
3. Using Brian Regal’s article, discuss the problem with supposed Bigfoot tracks.
Writing 1000
Short Answer Assignment
Using Brian Regal’s article, identify the other cryptozoologists working at the same time as Grover Krantz and describe their role in the hunt for Bigfoot.
In “Entering Dubious Realms,” Brian Regal identifies several of Grover Krantz’s contemporaries in the hunt for Bigfoot. In my response, I will briefly describe the roles they played in attempting to discover this probably non-existent primate. To begin, unlike most of the other so-called cryptozoologists, Krantz was a professionally trained anthropologist with a doctorate. Regal mentions that “amateurs were normally wary of professionals” (88), but two cryptozoologists were also professionally trained: namely, Ivan Sanderson and Bernard Heuvelmans. They appeared to offer some respectability to the field. As well, Regal mentions Carleton Coon, another trained anthropologist, but he only “dabbled in the field” (89). However, most of the people involved in the hunt for Bigfoot were not professional scientists. Of these, Regal mentions Roger Patterson who filmed “the contentious” Patterson-Gimlin film (90). Another was the Canadian journalist John Green whose book On the Tracks of the Sasquatch (published in 1968) was a study of the elusive creature. Regal writes of Ivan Marx and Paul Freeman, who supplied Krantz with casts of footprints, and yet who were accused hoaxers (91). In the same paragraph, Regal discusses René Dahinden, another Canadian cryptozoologist. Krantz’s relationship with Dahinden seems to have been stormy. Regal quotes Dahinden as claiming that Kranz’s work was “so dumb and stupid it boggles the mind” (p. 91). One of Regal’s main concerns in the article is that in his pursuit of Bigfoot, Krantz ran into difficulty not only with other academics in the field of anthropology but also with amateurs in the field of cryptozoology.

Works Cited
Regal, Brian. “Entering Dubious Realms: Grover Krantz, Science, and Sasquatch.” Annals of Science, vol. 66, no. 1, 2009, pp. 83-102.

Topic: Do relationships lead to happiness?
Please read attached explanation she

Topic: Do relationships lead to happiness?
Please read attached explanation sheet along with the rubric
Make sure to provide the counterargument as stated in the attached doc. listing the requirements.
use these sources:
Being In A Relationship Isn’t About Being Happy – It Is About Being Fully Awake — Growth Marriage.
Why No Relationship Will Make You Happy – Dr. Zoe Shaw
Why a Relationship Won’t Make You Happy | The Everygirl
Relationships and Happiness
Scientists found the key to a healthy, happy life: relationships | World Economic Forum
Relationships: A Key in Finding Happiness | Anthropedia | Anthropedia
How Do Relationships Impact Our Happiness? | Kaizen Center for Mental Health

Students will create a photo project and a 2-page-long typed reflection on their

Students will create a photo project and a 2-page-long typed reflection on their project. Responses must be in MLA format.
Purpose:
Explore through photos and writing how culture, art, and ideas of the U.S. are represented through your daily life.
Instructions:
Using the literary, visual, performing, and culinary arts that we have learned/explored so far, document versions of these pertaining to your personal daily life.
Use at least 1/2 page for each category. (Literary, Visual, Performing, Culinary)
Reflect on the photos and in your paper, write how these connect to the material in class. Talk about your experience and why you chose to document these specific instances.
Students are to submit their assignment by Oct. 13th, 11:59 p.m. using the submission link on this page.
Use citations and supporting evidence from texts/videos in your Modules when necessary.
Include at least 4 photos, at least one for each category. (Literary, Visual, Performing, Culinary) These are not included in the page length.
MLA Format Review Purdue WebpageLinks to an external site.
Tips for your submission:
Review our modules for inspiration. Make a scratch note of what you can include.
Although personal, and will only be viewed by your professor, Miss Layla, please keep it appropriate.
Remember, we are trying to explore the culture, ideas, and art of the U.S. What we do in our daily lives, is more artful than we notice.
In your paper, make sure you connect to the material.
You can submit a PDF, a Word document, a slideshow, a PowerPoint, etc.

assignment 1
Introduction
There are so many ways that we can receive nutrition information: books, websites, academic journals, social media, peers, family, and more! In this week’s assignment we are going to see how popular health sources stack up against nutrition research articles.
Your Tasks
TASK 1- SCROLL THROUGH YOUR FAVORITE MEDIA OR ONLINE SOURCES
You will search the internet or your social media feeds for a nutrition topic of your choice. The possibilities are endless! Try to choose a source that you use frequently or that others that you know use frequently.
TASK 2- FIND A RESEARCH STUDY.
Next, I want you to find a research study that talks about the same topic as the topic you found in Task 1. For example, if you found a YouTube video talking about the keto diet, you will then need to find a research article that also talks about the keto diet.
The following are suggestions for places that you can locate a research study:
Google ScholarIn the Google search engine type in “Google Scholar”. You can then type in the subject that you are interested in learning more about.
Library ResourcesOn the left of your screen you should see “Library Resources”. Click on that, and then click “A-Z Database List”. Click on “All Subjects” and then select “Health” from the drop-down menu. Select any of the provider search engines to find a research study.
The following are requirements for this part of the assignment:
TASK 3- ASSIGNMENT WRITE-UP
You will then provide the following in a write-up:
What was the main topic that you were exploring? (1 point)
Please provide a link to the video, post, or article. (1 point)
What claims were made in the social media post, video, or web article that you used? (3 points)
Please provide a link to the research study. (1 point)The research study cannot be more than 5 years old. (1 point)
What type of studyLinks to an external site. was conducted? (1 point)
Was the study peer reviewed? (1 point)
What were the findings from the study? (3 points)
How easy or difficult was it for you to understand the content of the study? Explain. (2 points)
How did this information compare to what you found in your social media post, video, or article? (2 points)
What are the benefits and challenges of learning about nutritional principles from nutrition studies compared to other sources (the news, social media, etc.)? (5 points)
Please write answers in complete sentences.
Assignment 2
Your Tasks
TASK 1
Review this list Links to an external site.of food assistance programs. Choose one that you would like to do more research on.
TASK 2
Answer the following questions about the organization:
What is the name of the program? 1 point
Why did you choose this program? 2 points
What is the target population? 2 points
What are the income eligibility requirements (if any)? Do you think that these requirements are too high or too low? Why or why not? 3 points
How does a person apply for benefits? 3 points
How does the program work? In other words, would a person receive food directly from the organization, or would they be given money to purchase food? 3 points
Is there a branch of this program located in San Diego? If yes, where (only include 2 locations)? 3 points
What is your personal opinion regarding food assistance programs? 3 points

What is your favorite way to edit? Do you work online or from a printed copy? Do

What is your favorite way to edit? Do you work online or from a printed copy? Do you cut your paper into pieces and rearrange it? Do you seek input from others or go it alone? Do you work all at once or break it up?
The instructions call for a response comprising of a minimum of two paragraphs, with each paragraph containing 5-7 sentences. Response must include any information you have gained from the textbook.
Van Rys, J., Meyer, V., VanderMay, R., & Sebranek, P. (2022). The college writer: A guide to thinking, writing, and researching (7th ed.). Cengage.
Chapter 25: Understanding grammar
Chapter 28: Marking punctuation
Chapter 29: Checking mechanics
Chapter 30: Using the right word

Context
Throughout the first half of this course, you have been introduced to key rhetorical concepts such as kairos, the rhetorical situation, and salience. You have applied these concepts to your writing and thinking, both in your weekly Kairos Journal entries and in your major assignments.
As we reach the midpoint of the semester, it’s important to pause and reflect on your learning journey so far. This Midterm Reflection assignment is an opportunity for you to consider how your understanding of rhetoric has developed and how you’ve applied course concepts to your work.
Purpose
The purpose of the Midterm Reflection is for you to critically examine your learning in the first half of the course, demonstrating your understanding of key rhetorical concepts and their application to your writing and thinking.
This assignment allows you to identify moments of insight, analyze your growth as a writer and thinker, and consider how you might apply your learning to upcoming assignments and projects. By engaging in self-reflection, you’ll gain a deeper understanding of your intellectual journey and set goals for the remainder of the course.
Audience
The primary audience for your Midterm Reflection me, your instructor, who will assess your understanding and application of course concepts, as well as your ability to engage in meaningful self-reflection. While your classmates will not read your reflection, you may choose to discuss your insights and experiences with them to foster a collaborative learning environment.
Genre
A reflective essay is a type of writing that explores your personal experiences, thoughts, and feelings about a particular topic or event.
In this case, your Midterm Reflection should focus on your learning in the first half of the course, analyzing how your understanding of key rhetorical concepts has developed and how you’ve applied these concepts to your writing and thinking. Your reflection should be introspective, thoughtful, and well-supported by specific examples from your work and course readings.
Requirements
To complete this assignment, follow these steps:
Review your Kairos Journal entries and major assignments completed in the first half of the semester.Note: Consistent participation in the Kairos Journal (i.e., completing all weekly entries) is required to pass this assignment. Missing more than three entries will result in a failing grade, regardless of the quality of completed entries.
Write a thoughtful reflection (300-600 words) that:Identifies key moments of learning or insight from the course so far
Analyzes how your understanding of kairos, audience, and rhetoric has developed
Discusses how you’ve applied course concepts to your writing and thinking
Considers how you might apply your learning to upcoming assignments and projects
Include specific examples from your work and course readings to support your reflection.
Format your issue proposal following these guidelines:
300-600 words
Double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font
1-inch margins
MLA format for in-text citations
Submission Requirements
Submit your Midterm Reflection as a Word document (.doc or .docx) or PDF file to this assignment page. Late submissions will be penalized according to the course policy listed in the Syllabus.
Evaluation Criteria
Mid-Term Reflections will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
Depth of Reflection and Self Analysis
Understanding of Course Concepts Covered in First Half of Course
Quality of Examples and Connections to Course Material
Insight into Personal Growth and Goals for the Rest of the Semester
Writing quality and organization

Essay #2: Fiction Comparative Analysis
First Draft Conferences — March 6-10
For this essay assignment, you’ll select one story from those we have discussed in class during this unit, and compare it critically to another story of your choosing:
Column A (pick one)
Chopin, “The Story of an Hour” (582)
Saunders, “Puppy” (188)
Nutting, “Model’s Assistant” (238)
Russell, “St. Lucy’s Home for Girls Raised By Wolves” (263)
Column B (pick one)
Hemingway, “Hills Like White Elephants” (699)
Sedaris, “Jesus Shaves” (490)
Marquez, “A Very Old Man With Enormous Wings” (428)
O’Connor, “A Good Man is Hard to Find”(498)
Wallace, “Good People” (232)
While a brief discussion of each story’s plot is relevant and necessary, the main focus of your comparison should focus upon two things:
the stories’ thematic commentaries and the relationship between the two
formal elements, such as setting, tone/tension, characterization, narrative POV, etc.
Planning
A suggested outline:
Intro paragraph:
First, engage your audience in a way that will make them interested in your topic and set the tone for what is to come; avoid over-generalization and vague rhetorical questions.
Second, connect your opening remarks to the topic and purpose of your essay (ie. the comparison of your chosen stories).
Finally, establish a thesis that makes clear the thematic relationship that will be discussed throughout the essay.
Do not use any version of the phrase “This essay will” or “The assignment is to” or “In this essay, I will” to accomplish this.
Summary:
No more than two paragraphs that capture the general settings and plots of the two stories being compared.
Paraphrase major passages, quote supportively, and rephrase the stories’ content without bias or judgement
Analysis:
At least one paragraph should discuss the thematic relationships between the stories — ie. the “under the surface” forces and systems at play in the story and how they intersect and diverge from each other in interesting ways.
At least one other paragraph should discuss one other literary device and its unique or similar deployment or effect in the stories.
Show a couple of examples of each instance you identify, discuss how they work to convey the stories’ meanings.
Be sure to utilize quotes and effective paraphrase from supportive textual moments. Don’t be too general, but not too specific, either – think carefully and economically about the details you cite.
Conclusion:
A final word on the overall relationship between the stories.
Begin by recapturing (not restating or repeating) your thesis, and try to connect back to the thoughts you opened the essay with in your intro
Specifics
The following criteria must be met in order to receive a score:
• Essays should be at least three typed pages
• MLA style documentation and work cited page is required
• No outside sources beyond the two chosen texts are to be used in this essay

Watch this video.
Then, post your thoughts (hit the reply button below) on Sport

Watch this video.
Then, post your thoughts (hit the reply button below) on Sport Nutrition and whether or not it applies to the topic in the video. Be very specific and compare to one of the specific topics covered in the video. After your post, reply to at least one of your classmates original post (hit the reply button below their original post). Do not reply to a reply.
20 points for your original post and 10 points for replying to your classmates.
As a reminder on your replies:
10 points for your replies to a classmate original posts, not on a reply they left for another classmate. (Click “Reply” at the bottom of their main post):
Your reply to a classmate must be at least 3 substantial sentences. The items below are example of brief, vague or “throw-away” response statements and will not receive credit. It is okay to include them in addition to your 3 substantial sentences, but not instead of your 3 substantial sentences.

After reading “I Stand Here Ironing,” please respond to these questions by numbering them in Word, put in MLA format, and upload by following the directions.
1. Please examine the significance of the setting in this story in 3-6 sentences. Examine the role setting has when Emily is born and how it changes as she grows up.
2. Can the case be made for the mother doing the best she could for Emily given the circumstances?
3. Determine the tone and explain of this story in 3-6 sentences.

1. Freud started his theoretical postulations by studying patients with hysteric

1. Freud started his theoretical postulations by studying patients with hysterical or conversion reactions. This led to his realization that his patients had conscious and unconscious aspects of memory. Why was this realization significant? How did this influence the development of the field of psychology and modern therapy practices? Explain.
2. What is the relationship between Freud’s notion of a “secondary system” and his abandonment of the “seduction hypothesis?” Do you believe his abandonment of the “seduction hypothesis” was the right choice for future of psychology? Why or why not? Support your response
Requirements: 250 each questions