First, read Case Study: 11.3 (Ethical Diversity Scenarios) in Johnson (2021). Se

First, read Case Study: 11.3 (Ethical Diversity Scenarios) in Johnson (2021). Se

First, read Case Study: 11.3 (Ethical Diversity Scenarios) in Johnson (2021). Select one of the scenarios in Case Study 11.3 (A, B, C, D, or E) for analysis. Be certain to indicate which scenario you selected in your post. Determine which region of the world the scenario takes place in. If the scenario does not explicitly indicate a country, select a country from within the region to investigate. If you choose to analyze Scenario “B,” you must select Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, or UAE (United Arab Emirates) as your hypothetical country.
Now, visit the following website to investigate the culture in which the case study hypothetically takes place:
Compare Countries (Hofstede Insights, 2022).
Use the country comparison tool to analyze your hypothetical country on the following dimensions. Be sure to share what you learn in your post.
Power distance
Individualism vs. collectivism
Masculinity vs. femininity
Uncertainty avoidance
Long-term orientation
Indulgence
Next, apply one of the three methods for making a cross-cultural ethical decision (ISCT, HKH, or Metaethics) to the scenario. Be sure to cite one of the following sources in your response, depending upon the method you select:
ISCT: Donaldson (2009), Baird & Mayer (2021), or Ast (2019)
HKH: Hamilton et al. (2009)
Metaethics: Ting-Toomey (2011)

Greater Good Analysis For this week′s assignment respond to one of the following

Greater Good Analysis
For this week′s assignment respond to one of the following

Greater Good Analysis
For this week′s assignment respond to one of the following options, and include Option 1, 2, or 3 as part of your heading.
Option 1: The first option is to name and describe in detail a key specific and recent healthcare technology. What are at least two key moral problems this technology creates? What are the proper moral guidelines for dealing with it in your view? Compare your approach to what a utilitarian and ethical egoist would say (each independently). Consider whether differing ethical beliefs globally might or not agree with what you say.
Option 2: In the second option, name and describe in detail a key specific and recent social technology. What are at least two key moral problems this technology creates? What are the proper moral guidelines for dealing with it in your view? Compare your moral approach to what a utilitarian and social contract ethicist would say (each independently). Consider whether differing ethical beliefs globally might or not agree with what you say.
Option 3: John Doe, Patient One, is in late stage of kidney disease. If he does not receive a new kidney, then he is predicted to die within a week. Doe is 45, single, and has no children. Doctors theorize that Doe damaged his kidney by not following a low-salt diet. Doe inherited one million dollars and is known for giving money to charity. Without a transplant, he will probably be forced to spend all his money searching for a kidney outside of the usual legal channels. Patient Two is Jane Doe (no relation to John). Patient Two is a mother of two children (ages 21 and 24). She is divorced and 55 years old. She developed kidney problems due to eating a high-fat and high-sugar diet. If she does not receive a kidney within one month, doctors believe she will die. Patient Three is an orphan. This orphan lives in a state facility. She was born with a genetic condition that constantly damages her kidney. The only known approach to her condition is to provide her with a kidney transplant every so often. She is 11 and has already undergone two kidney transplants. She will perish in two months if she does not receive another transplant.
All three patients are at the same hospital. The hospital only has one kidney to give out. The orphan′s birth parents were known to be of a religion that is opposed to organ donation. The other patients come from religions that do not oppose organ donation. Who should get the kidney? Why should that candidate receive it over the others? Devise a course of social action and a solution for this case by using the ethics of egoism and then utilitarianism to a key moral conflict involving health care in this case. Appraise the interests of diverse populations (in terms of ethnicity, race, religion, sexual orientation, etc.) and how they relate to the case. Consider whether differing ethical beliefs globally might or not agree with what you say.
For all the options:
Cite the textbook and incorporate outside sources, including citations.
You should not be using any text you used in a discussion board or assignment for this class or any previous class.
Consider whether differing ethical beliefs globally might or not agree with what you say.
You will submit the following:
An audiovisual presentation that presents one of the options above. Be sure to give equal time to each element. Doing a PowerPoint presentation with audio recorded on the slides is preferred. Please refer to the Narrated PowerPoint Tutorial located in the Required Resources in this assignment.
Please provide a transсrіpt of anything said in the recording aloud that does not appear as text on a slide. This transсrіpt can be provided as a Word document or placed in the Notes section on the PowerPoint slides.
The link or a scan of the article mentioning any health technology, social technology, or case you are reporting on. If you made up the case, please indicate that in your report. If you choose to do option #3 (the case about a shortage of transplant kidneys), your article would likely be an article about the shortage of transplant organs, or a shortage of people signing up to be transplant donors, or the status of educating people about being donors, etc.
Requirements
Length: 4-6 minutes narrated presentation
Slide length: 4-6 slides (not including title slide, conclusion slide, or references slide)
Title slide
Conclusion slide
References slide (minimum of 2 scholarly sources cited in APA format; not narrated)

Every one of us has different values, beliefs, and thoughts that define who we a

Every one of us has different values, beliefs, and thoughts that define who we a

Every one of us has different values, beliefs, and thoughts that define who we are. Some topics are harder to discuss that others. From the list of topics, choose one that you want to learn about.
• Choose an ethical topic from below and Compose a two-page paper
• Answer the four questions below. I suggest a small paragraph for each question
• You must utilize 2 scholarly references and utilize APA formatting
• You may choose your own ethical issue

Movie: The Dark Knight (2008) Prompts/Outline: After watching your

Movie: The Dark Knight (2008)
Prompts/Outline:
After watching your

Movie: The Dark Knight (2008)
Prompts/Outline:
After watching your chosen film:
1. Choose two ethical theories/medical principles to apply the moral dilemma presented in the film. Choose from the list below: Warning: As we have learned, it is only possible to argue an ethical situation using the four pillars with a normative ethical theory as a foundation. Autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice look different from a Kantian perspective than a utilitarian one.
Virtue ethics
Utilitarian ethics
Kantian ethics
Autonomy
Beneficence
Non-maleficence
Justice
2. Introduction: Outline the movie and then describe the two chosen theories in your own words, backing up your views with academic resources as evidence for your explanation of the moral views.
3. Body: Discuss how these two chosen theories could provide solutions or remedies for the ethical dilemma featured within the film. Be sure your analysis follows this structure and addresses all of the following:
Outline the paramount features of your chosen theories, which are found in the movie?
What conflicts, which are present in the film, relate to your chosen theories?
What moral guidance does the ethical theories you selected provide the characters in the film?
Conclusion: Provide a summary of what you have discussed and reflect on what you have learned. Point out the possible weaknesses of your selected theories, and then apply what you have learned to both your personal and professional life.

Title: Exploring Corporate Culture at Beirut Arab University: Analysis and Recom

Title: Exploring Corporate Culture at Beirut Arab University: Analysis and Recom

Title: Exploring Corporate Culture at Beirut Arab University: Analysis and Recommendations
Objective: The objective of this assignment project is to examine and evaluate the corporate culture of Beirut Arab University (BAU), understanding its significance within the institution, analyzing its impact on various aspects such as staff behavior, academic performance, and institutional outcomes, and providing recommendations for enhancing the corporate culture.
Assignment Overview: This project entails a comprehensive investigation into the corporate culture at Beirut Arab University (BAU), with a focus on its influence on staff behavior, academic engagement, and overall institutional success. It involves studying different aspects of BAU′s corporate culture, its defining characteristics, and its implications for staff morale, productivity, and institutional outcomes.
Tasks:
1. Introduction to Corporate Culture at Beirut Arab University (10%)
• Define corporate culture and its importance within educational institutions like Beirut Arab University.
• Discuss the role of corporate culture in shaping staff behavior and academic performance at BAU.
2. Types of Corporate Cultures at Beirut Arab University (20%)
• Research and identify specific aspects of BAU′s corporate culture.
• Describe the defining features and values associated with BAU′s corporate culture.
3. Impact of Corporate Culture at Beirut Arab University (30%)
• Analyze the influence of BAU′s corporate culture on staff behavior, motivation, and academic performance.
• Discuss how BAU′s corporate culture affects institutional outcomes such as student success, research output, and community engagement.
4. Case Study Analysis of Beirut Arab University (25%)
• Conduct a case study analysis of BAU′s corporate culture, focusing on its strengths and weaknesses.
• Evaluate how BAU′s corporate culture has contributed to its success or challenges as an educational institution.
5. Implications and Recommendations for Beirut Arab University (15%)
• Provide insights into the implications of BAU′s corporate culture on institutional effectiveness and staff well-being.
• Based on the analysis, offer recommendations for fostering a positive and conducive corporate culture at Beirut Arab University.
Submission Guidelines:
• Submit the assignment in a typed format, using a standard font size (12) and style (Times New Roman).
• Include appropriate citations and references for all sources used in APA format.
• Ensure the assignment is well-organized, with clear headings and subheadings for each
section.
• The assignment can be completed individually or in groups of up to five members.
• Paper size should be 15 to 20 pages with page numbering and a list of references at the end.
• Originality of the assignment will be assessed through a similarity check.
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

Title: Exploring Corporate Culture at Beirut Arab University: Analysis and Recom

Title: Exploring Corporate Culture at Beirut Arab University: Analysis and Recom

Title: Exploring Corporate Culture at Beirut Arab University: Analysis and Recommendations
Objective: The objective of this assignment project is to examine and evaluate the corporate culture of Beirut Arab University (BAU), understanding its significance within the institution, analyzing its impact on various aspects such as staff behavior, academic performance, and institutional outcomes, and providing recommendations for enhancing the corporate culture.
Assignment Overview: This project entails a comprehensive investigation into the corporate culture at Beirut Arab University (BAU), with a focus on its influence on staff behavior, academic engagement, and overall institutional success. It involves studying different aspects of BAU′s corporate culture, its defining characteristics, and its implications for staff morale, productivity, and institutional outcomes.
Tasks:
1. Introduction to Corporate Culture at Beirut Arab University (10%)
• Define corporate culture and its importance within educational institutions like Beirut Arab University.
• Discuss the role of corporate culture in shaping staff behavior and academic performance at BAU.
2. Types of Corporate Cultures at Beirut Arab University (20%)
• Research and identify specific aspects of BAU′s corporate culture.
• Describe the defining features and values associated with BAU′s corporate culture.
3. Impact of Corporate Culture at Beirut Arab University (30%)
• Analyze the influence of BAU′s corporate culture on staff behavior, motivation, and academic performance.
• Discuss how BAU′s corporate culture affects institutional outcomes such as student success, research output, and community engagement.
4. Case Study Analysis of Beirut Arab University (25%)
• Conduct a case study analysis of BAU′s corporate culture, focusing on its strengths and weaknesses.
• Evaluate how BAU′s corporate culture has contributed to its success or challenges as an educational institution.
5. Implications and Recommendations for Beirut Arab University (15%)
• Provide insights into the implications of BAU′s corporate culture on institutional effectiveness and staff well-being.
• Based on the analysis, offer recommendations for fostering a positive and conducive corporate culture at Beirut Arab University.
Submission Guidelines:
• Submit the assignment in a typed format, using a standard font size (12) and style (Times New Roman).
• Include appropriate citations and references for all sources used in APA format.
• Ensure the assignment is well-organized, with clear headings and subheadings for each
section.
• The assignment can be completed individually or in groups of up to five members.
• Paper size should be 15 to 20 pages with page numbering and a list of references at the end.
• Originality of the assignment will be assessed through a similarity check.
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

Option 3: John Doe, Patient One, is in late stage of kidney disease. If he does

Option 3: John Doe, Patient One, is in late stage of kidney disease. If he does

Option 3: John Doe, Patient One, is in late stage of kidney disease. If he does not receive a new kidney, then he is predicted to die within a week. Doe is 45, single, and has no children. Doctors theorize that Doe damaged his kidney by not following a low-salt diet. Doe inherited one million dollars and is known for giving money to charity. Without a transplant, he will probably be forced to spend all his money searching for a kidney outside of the usual legal channels. Patient Two is Jane Doe (no relation to John). Patient Two is a mother of two children (ages 21 and 24). She is divorced and 55 years old. She developed kidney problems due to eating a high-fat and high-sugar diet. If she does not receive a kidney within one month, doctors believe she will die. Patient Three is an orphan. This orphan lives in a state facility. She was born with a genetic condition that constantly damages her kidney. The only known approach to her condition is to provide her with a kidney transplant every so often. She is 11 and has already undergone two kidney transplants. She will perish in two months if she does not receive another transplant.
All three patients are at the same hospital. The hospital only has one kidney to give out. The orphan’s birth parents were known to be of a religion that is opposed to organ donation. The other patients come from religions that do not oppose organ donation. Who should get the kidney? Why should that candidate receive it over the others? Devise a course of social action and a solution for this case by using the ethics of egoism and then utilitarianism to a key moral conflict involving health care in this case. Appraise the interests of diverse populations (in terms of ethnicity, race, religion, sexual orientation, etc.) and how they relate to the case. Consider whether differing ethical beliefs globally might or not agree with what you say.
For all the options:
Cite the textbook and incorporate outside sources, including citations.
You should not be using any text you used in a discussion board or assignment for this class or any previous class.
Consider whether differing ethical beliefs globally might or not agree with what you say.
You will submit the following:
An audiovisual presentation that presents one of the options above. Be sure to give equal time to each element. Doing a PowerPoint presentation with audio recorded on the slides is preferred. Please refer to the Narrated PowerPoint Tutorial located in the Required Resources in this assignment.
Please provide a transcript of anything said in the recording aloud that does not appear as text on a slide. This transcript can be provided as a Word document or placed in the Notes section on the PowerPoint slides.
The link or a scan of the article mentioning any health technology, social technology, or case you are reporting on. If you made up the case, please indicate that in your report. If you choose to do option #3 (the case about a shortage of transplant kidneys), your article would likely be an article about the shortage of transplant organs, or a shortage of people signing up to be transplant donors, or the status of educating people about being donors, etc.
Requirements
Length: 4-6 minutes narrated presentation
Slide length: 4-6 slides (not including title slide, conclusion slide, or references slide)
Title slide
Conclusion slide
References slide (minimum of 2 scholarly sources cited in APA format; not narrated)

Option 3: John Doe, Patient One, is in late stage of kidney disease. If he does

Option 3: John Doe, Patient One, is in late stage of kidney disease. If he does

Option 3: John Doe, Patient One, is in late stage of kidney disease. If he does not receive a new kidney, then he is predicted to die within a week. Doe is 45, single, and has no children. Doctors theorize that Doe damaged his kidney by not following a low-salt diet. Doe inherited one million dollars and is known for giving money to charity. Without a transplant, he will probably be forced to spend all his money searching for a kidney outside of the usual legal channels. Patient Two is Jane Doe (no relation to John). Patient Two is a mother of two children (ages 21 and 24). She is divorced and 55 years old. She developed kidney problems due to eating a high-fat and high-sugar diet. If she does not receive a kidney within one month, doctors believe she will die. Patient Three is an orphan. This orphan lives in a state facility. She was born with a genetic condition that constantly damages her kidney. The only known approach to her condition is to provide her with a kidney transplant every so often. She is 11 and has already undergone two kidney transplants. She will perish in two months if she does not receive another transplant.
All three patients are at the same hospital. The hospital only has one kidney to give out. The orphan’s birth parents were known to be of a religion that is opposed to organ donation. The other patients come from religions that do not oppose organ donation. Who should get the kidney? Why should that candidate receive it over the others? Devise a course of social action and a solution for this case by using the ethics of egoism and then utilitarianism to a key moral conflict involving health care in this case. Appraise the interests of diverse populations (in terms of ethnicity, race, religion, sexual orientation, etc.) and how they relate to the case. Consider whether differing ethical beliefs globally might or not agree with what you say.
For all the options:
Cite the textbook and incorporate outside sources, including citations.
You should not be using any text you used in a discussion board or assignment for this class or any previous class.
Consider whether differing ethical beliefs globally might or not agree with what you say.
You will submit the following:
An audiovisual presentation that presents one of the options above. Be sure to give equal time to each element. Doing a PowerPoint presentation with audio recorded on the slides is preferred. Please refer to the Narrated PowerPoint Tutorial located in the Required Resources in this assignment.
Please provide a transcript of anything said in the recording aloud that does not appear as text on a slide. This transcript can be provided as a Word document or placed in the Notes section on the PowerPoint slides.
The link or a scan of the article mentioning any health technology, social technology, or case you are reporting on. If you made up the case, please indicate that in your report. If you choose to do option #3 (the case about a shortage of transplant kidneys), your article would likely be an article about the shortage of transplant organs, or a shortage of people signing up to be transplant donors, or the status of educating people about being donors, etc.
Requirements
Length: 4-6 minutes narrated presentation
Slide length: 4-6 slides (not including title slide, conclusion slide, or references slide)
Title slide
Conclusion slide
References slide (minimum of 2 scholarly sources cited in APA format; not narrated)