Category: History

Exhibition Review Paper Background For this assignment you must attend a special

Exhibition Review Paper
Background
For this assignment you must attend a special exhibition at a local area museum and write a review of that exhibit. Exhibitions/exhibits are not works of art that are part of the museum’s permanent collection. Instead, they are a specifically collected and curated group of paintings or other objects that are in a special gallery space in the museum for a limited run. We are lucky to have so many great museums here in Los Angeles which means that it is possible to go and view premodern art objects without having to travel very far.
I would like you to choose one of the two exhibits to visit
Mapping the Infinite: Cosmologies Across Cultures – open October 20, 2024 to March 2, 2025 – https://www.lacma.org/art/exhibition/mapping-infinite-cosmologies-across-cultures Links to an external site.*LACMA is the Los Angeles County Art Museum. The cost is $24 for students residing outside of LA county, $19 for students in LA county, and FREE to anyone in LA county after 3pm Mondays-Fridays. There is an additional cost if you use LACMA’s parking garage.
Rising Signs: The Medieval Science of Astrology – open October 1, 2024 to January 5, 2025 – https://www.getty.edu/visit/cal/events/ev_4084.html#:~:text=Exploring%20the%2012%20signs%20of,life%20in%20the%20Middle%20AgesLinks to an external site.. *The Getty Center (not to be confused with the Getty Villa) is free to everyone BUT you must pay $30 to park in their parking garage unless you take public transit or a ride share.

Directions
Exhibition reviews consist of three main elements, descriiption, analysis, and evaluation. You should describe the exhibit in a way that the reader can understand as they likely will not have seen the exhibit before reading your review. Next you need to analyze the exhibit by discussing how some select aspects of the exhibit function and what all the parts of the exhibit add up to. Finally, you must evaluate how successful the exhibition is, in your opinion. Was the exhibit done well and is it worth seeing?
Your review must include the following;
A title that engages the reader (imagine you are reading this review in a new source; what title would draw you in?)
An introduction paragraph that introduces the reader to all the relevant information about the exhibit and contains a thesis that establishes the tone and direction of the review.
A paragraph that goes into further details on the theme and scope of the exhibit.
A paragraph about the setting and layout of the exhibit in the museum space. This paragraphs should include specific references to works of art, groupings of works of art, and/or wall text in the exhibit in order to help illustrate your points.
A paragraph or two, on the strengths and/or weaknesses of the exhibit. These paragraphs should include specific references to works of art, groupings of works of art, and/or wall text in the exhibit in order to help illustrate your points.
A conclusion paragraph that summarizes the thesis that has emerged throughout your review.
Your exhibition review must be approximately 3 pages in length, double-spaced, Times New Roman font or equivalent. It must have a paragraph structure. Any use of AI listed on the syllabus is prohibited.

Additional Resources
I highly recommend that you look up the exhibition page on the museum website, read all text on the walls, take a brochure if provided, listen to any available audio programs, take notes while walking through the exhibition, and even revisit the exhibition in the revision stage of your paper if you are able.
The above assignment was adapted from Sylvan Barnet’s “Writing a Review of an Exhibition”, A Short Guide to Writing About Art. If you would like to read more in-depth instructions along with some sample exhibition reviews, please download the short reading below.
“Writing a Review of an Exhibition”Download “Writing a Review of an Exhibition”
More examples of exhibition reviews can be found at the below link!
Artnet ReviewsLinks to an external site.

My choice is home front (Germany, Japan, Britain and the US, and include soviet

My choice is home front (Germany, Japan, Britain and the US, and include soviet union)
Hide Assignment Information
Instructions
For this project, you will have the choice to view the war from a different perspective. You can choose the perspective of a colony, another country or from the home front of Germany, Japan, Britain and the US.
If you choose the colony route, explore how the colony contributed to the overall effort of the colonial mother. Explore what the people thought of the war.
If you choose the another country route, pick a country that contributed the war effort. Canada and Australia are not an option here. They have major roles in the war. You are looking for a country, say Argentina. Explore what role the country played in the war effort, if any. What side of the war did the country choose to support and why? How did the people feel about the overall war?
If you choose the home front, your slides will be need to focus on the 4 listed. You can add Soviet Union as well. Explore what the people were being told versus reality. How did the home front work? Who supplied the labor? What policies were enacted to help the war effort? How were casualties treated at home when they returned?
Which ever route you choose, you will need to have 4 sources minimum along with pictures for every slide that help prove your point. Pictures are a loose term. You can have graphs or other items to support. Check out the syllabus for the preferred amount. You need to cite your work as you go on the slides. No paragraphs, just bullet points.

What is Atlantic History? If someone asked you what class you were currently tak

What is Atlantic History? If someone asked you what class you were currently taking, how would you define Atlantic World History in 2–3 sentences? How do the readings, presentations, and videos thus far in this course illuminate your definition and reflect the concepts, contours, and focus of Atlantic World History?
The student will complete 3 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 400 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned module: week. The student must then post 2 replies of at least 250 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of the assigned module: week. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly citations in Turabian format. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 scholarly citation in Turabian format. Acceptable sources include textbooks, HIWD 560 presentations, academic journal articles published in the last 5 years, academic books and the Bible.

– NO LESS THEN 3 FULL PAGES NO MORE THEN 5 – DO NOT CHOOSE ANYTHING PASS THE VI

– NO LESS THEN 3 FULL PAGES NO MORE THEN 5
– DO NOT CHOOSE ANYTHING PASS THE VIETNAM WAR 1960
– WRITTEN IN WORD NOT PDF
– USE AT LEAST 2 MISSION COMMANDS (MORE COULD BE USED) TO SUPPORT THE OPINION AS TO WHY THE BATTLE WAS A SUCCESS OR FAILURE. **KEY POINT IN PAPER
– APA 7, TIMES NEW ROMAN, 12″ FONT, DOUBLE SPACED
– ABSTRACT (150-250 WORDS) DOES NOT COUNT TOWARD THE 3 PAGE MINIMUM
– 2 REFERENCES (HAS TO HAVE AN IN-TEXT CITATION)
– TITLE PAGE
– PAGES NUMBERED
– ABSOLUTELY NO AI
– ABSOLUTELY GRAMMATICAL ERRORS
OTHER REFERENCES TO LOOK INTO THAT I TRIED TO UPLOAD BUT THE FILES WERE TO BIG ARE:
– ADP 6-0 PAGE 1-7 (ITS THE INTRO ON MISSION COMMAND)
– 16 CASE STUDY OF MISSION COMMAND General Editor
Donald P. Wright, Ph. D. (I CAN EMAIL THIS IF YOU CANNOT FIND IT ONLINE)
****THE RUBRIC IS ATTAACHED. PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF ANYTHING IS UNCLEAR.

Exhibition Review Paper Background For this assignment you must attend a special

Exhibition Review Paper
Background
For this assignment you must attend a special exhibition at a local area museum and write a review of that exhibit. Exhibitions/exhibits are not works of art that are part of the museum’s permanent collection. Instead, they are a specifically collected and curated group of paintings or other objects that are in a special gallery space in the museum for a limited run. We are lucky to have so many great museums here in Los Angeles which means that it is possible to go and view premodern art objects without having to travel very far.
I would like you to choose one of the two exhibits to visit
Mapping the Infinite: Cosmologies Across Cultures – open October 20, 2024 to March 2, 2025 – https://www.lacma.org/art/exhibition/mapping-infinite-cosmologies-across-cultures Links to an external site.*LACMA is the Los Angeles County Art Museum. The cost is $24 for students residing outside of LA county, $19 for students in LA county, and FREE to anyone in LA county after 3pm Mondays-Fridays. There is an additional cost if you use LACMA’s parking garage.
Rising Signs: The Medieval Science of Astrology – open October 1, 2024 to January 5, 2025 – https://www.getty.edu/visit/cal/events/ev_4084.html#:~:text=Exploring%20the%2012%20signs%20of,life%20in%20the%20Middle%20AgesLinks to an external site.. *The Getty Center (not to be confused with the Getty Villa) is free to everyone BUT you must pay $30 to park in their parking garage unless you take public transit or a ride share.

Directions
Exhibition reviews consist of three main elements, descriiption, analysis, and evaluation. You should describe the exhibit in a way that the reader can understand as they likely will not have seen the exhibit before reading your review. Next you need to analyze the exhibit by discussing how some select aspects of the exhibit function and what all the parts of the exhibit add up to. Finally, you must evaluate how successful the exhibition is, in your opinion. Was the exhibit done well and is it worth seeing?
Your review must include the following;
A title that engages the reader (imagine you are reading this review in a new source; what title would draw you in?)
An introduction paragraph that introduces the reader to all the relevant information about the exhibit and contains a thesis that establishes the tone and direction of the review.
A paragraph that goes into further details on the theme and scope of the exhibit.
A paragraph about the setting and layout of the exhibit in the museum space. This paragraphs should include specific references to works of art, groupings of works of art, and/or wall text in the exhibit in order to help illustrate your points.
A paragraph or two, on the strengths and/or weaknesses of the exhibit. These paragraphs should include specific references to works of art, groupings of works of art, and/or wall text in the exhibit in order to help illustrate your points.
A conclusion paragraph that summarizes the thesis that has emerged throughout your review.
Your exhibition review must be approximately 3 pages in length, double-spaced, Times New Roman font or equivalent. It must have a paragraph structure. Any use of AI listed on the syllabus is prohibited.

Additional Resources
I highly recommend that you look up the exhibition page on the museum website, read all text on the walls, take a brochure if provided, listen to any available audio programs, take notes while walking through the exhibition, and even revisit the exhibition in the revision stage of your paper if you are able.
The above assignment was adapted from Sylvan Barnet’s “Writing a Review of an Exhibition”, A Short Guide to Writing About Art. If you would like to read more in-depth instructions along with some sample exhibition reviews, please download the short reading below.
“Writing a Review of an Exhibition”Download “Writing a Review of an Exhibition”
More examples of exhibition reviews can be found at the below link!
Artnet ReviewsLinks to an external site.

In the 1930’s, as part of the Federal Writers’ Project under President Franklin

In the 1930’s, as part of the Federal Writers’ Project under President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal Program, the Works Progress Administration interviewed former slaves. These narratives, as oral history, are considered primary sources.
For this assignment, you will be utilizing the Library of Congress’ site that archives 2,300 oral histories, which you can browse by narrator, keyword, or state. From these narratives, you will select five different slave narratives to analyze, synthesize the information read, and then write a critical thinking reflection (essay format with citations) that addresses the following questions (the readings for this assignment are attached below):
What is the point of these narratives—why are they written?
What did the former slaves in the narratives you chose, do during slavery vs. afterward?
Some lives changed a lot, while others stayed the same. Some former slaves learned to read, some became teachers or railroad workers. Others continued to work on farms as poor sharecroppers. Some voted for the first time and earned their first real wages during Reconstruction. Did life change significantly for African Americans during Reconstruction, and after the Civil War?
How much time passed between slavery and interviews? How might this time lag affect their stories?
How old are the subjects when interviewed? Does age affect memories?
Who interviewed the people and documented their stories? Is it significant that interviewers were white, while the subjects were black? If so, why?
There are different perspectives that vary from each former slaves. What details intrigued or surprised you?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of oral histories?
How has the individual story of a former slave changed your understanding of slavery? Or has it?
Which story stands out in your mind the most? Why?
Your response should be written in sentence/paragraph format and include examples from the narratives as evidence of your analysis and evaluation.
Include an introduction that summarizes the purpose of the narratives and gives context to what the narratives highlighted in your analysis of them. Begin your paragraphs with topic sentences that identify what each paragraph will be about, making sure your paragraph stays on topic and illustrates your point. Include a conclusion that ties it all together.
Since you will quote from primary sources in order to illustrate your response, please utilize the Citation Guides in the Orientation Module which highlights the citation generator Noodle Tools in order to include footnote citations and a bibliography in Chicago-style for all quotes and any paraphrased materials (a separate page for a bibliography is required in this assignment). Expected minimum length of this assignment is 2-3 pages. This length does not include heading and title details, footnotes, or the bibliography.
Additional Articles:

Oral History: Defined


https://www.loc.gov/collections/slave-narratives-from-the-federal-writers-project-1936-to-1938/articles-and-essays/introduction-to-the-wpa-slave-narratives/wpa-and-the-slave-narrative-collection/
https://www.loc.gov/collections/slave-narratives-from-the-federal-writers-project-1936-to-1938/about-this-collection/

The class is euro rel history. Select two religious artifacts from our course te

The class is euro rel history. Select two religious artifacts from our course text and describe and analyze them.
How is their style, symbolism, and purpose a reflection of the historical context in which they were created? Compare and contrast them by pointing out similarities and differences between them.And the two (artifacts are stained glass windows and religious sculptures figures )
3pages double space.