Examine how the COVID-19 Pandemic influenced patients with mental health disorde

Examine how the COVID-19 Pandemic influenced patients with mental health disorde

Examine how the COVID-19 Pandemic influenced patients with mental health disorders and their treatment plans. Use this week’s required readings, recommended readings, the textbook and your own research to develop a PowerPoint presentation describing:
An overview of symptoms, risk factors, and prevalence of mental health disease in KSA
Best practices for diagnosis, early identification, and treatment of mental illness in a pandemic
What are the contemporary and future challenges related to the healthcare system management of this mental illness in a pandemic?
Recommendations on how to address these challenges going forward.
Your presentation should meet the following structural requirements:
Be 10-12 slides in length, not including the title or reference slides.
Be formatted according to Saudi Electronic University and APA writing guidelines.
Provide support for your statements with citations from a minimum of six scholarly articles. These citations should be listed in the Notes section of the slide in which they appear. Two of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures, but four must be external.
Each slide must provide detailed speaker’s notes to support the slide content. These should be a minimum of 100 words long (per slide) and must be a part of the presentation. The presentation cannot be submitted in PDF format, which does not make notes visible to the instructor. Notes must draw from and cite relevant reference materials.
Utilize headings to organize the content in your work.

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to thi

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to thi

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Program 1: Reducing Drug Use Overdose Rates in New York City.*
In June 2022, the New York City (NYC) Department of Health and Mental Hygiene reported that a person dies from a drug overdose in NYC every three hours (NYC Health 2022). With high rates of overdose deaths in NYC and the increasing risk of dangerous opioids contributing to these overdoses, there is a need to establish protective mechanisms for this vulnerable population.
Overdose prevention centers (OPCs) are like syringe service programs in that they provide safe spaces for sterile needle exchanges, harm reduction services, and health care referrals. However, OPCs have the added service of being a supervised injection site. These sites are overseen by health care professionals to help reverse overdoses when needed. Though OPCs have been implemented in other countries globally with success, these sites have remained under consideration in the United States (US).
In November of 2021, the nation’s first OPC site (privately funded) was opened in NYC in two Manhattan neighborhoods. With recent increases in opioid-related overdose deaths across the nation, supervised injection sites have the potential to save lives and get people who inject drugs (PWIDs) connected to necessary health care services. The goal of the program is to reduce overdose deaths in the two Manhattan neighborhoods by 15% in the first year of program implementation. Additionally, the program aims to conduct health care assessments on 40% of PWIDs that utilize the services of the center. By engaging with a vulnerable population in a meaningful way, the OPC site hopes to establish a positive rapport among the community and among the NYC Health Department to garner further financial support and scaling of services to additional neighborhoods.
*Based on a real program but the goals were constructed for the purposes of this assignment.
Instructions: Read Program 1 above, then complete the methods section and study design section addressing each component, some information is provided below
Methods:
Sampling and elgibility – how many participants will complete the evaluation, and how will they be identified (randomly, systematically, convenience, purposive)
Program Description: This section includes program objectives, provides a detailed description of program components (intervention activities), as well as the program’s strategies, content, implementers, and setting(s).
Objectives (SMART): The narrative should begin with the program’s long-term health objective, intermediate behavioral objective(s) and immediate short-term objectives (at least 2)
Logic Model Completed in its entirety (use template provided)
Study Design:
Design a quasi-experimental design (be sure to include design notation and a description of the design)
Include rationale for the chosen design and address:
Threats to validity and if/how they will be addressed
Anticipated challenges
Recommended solutions to meet those challenges
Correct grammar, professional formatting, and proofreading of paper
Paper is complete, clear, comprehensive and follows instructions/includes all sections noted in syllabus; paper flow is logical and intuitive.
Paper is appropriately and adequately cited and referenced in APA 7th edition citations.
No more than 2 pages not including the logic model
Paper Clarity and Formatting:
Requirements: 2 full pages from top to bottom Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages, plus the complete logic model | .doc file
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to use in-text citations.
Please be sure to use credible or scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.

Individual Community Needs Assessment research paper directions: o For the indiv

Individual Community Needs Assessment research paper directions:
o For the indiv

Individual Community Needs Assessment research paper directions:
o For the individual research paper, you are going to collect relevant data pertaining to the
current mental health needs within the community you live in.
Area : Jacksonville, Florida
o APA style paper with reference page
o 1-2 pages , double-spaced
o Times New Roman ,12 font
Criteria: Rubric
1. Student collects relevant
data that pertains to the
current mental health issues
of the community in which
they live
This includes:
-Prevalence
-Demographics

2. Student researches the
current mental health
services offered in their
community ( JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA ) and summarizes
the types of facilities
available to their community
*This should just be a
summary of services offered
and types of facilities. Do
not list every single mental
health facility.
3.Student researches
qualifications to accessing
these mental health services
within their community and
summarizes these findings.
4.Student researches and
identifies potential barriers
or gaps to accessing the
mental health services
within their community
5.Student’s paper is written in
APA style, and sources
used within the paper are
cited in APA format.
Paper is double-spaced, 12
font, Times New Roman, 1-2
pages in length
Student also includes a
Reference page at the end
of the paper that is also in
APA format
Student uses resources
from reliable reports,government-operated sites,
academic studies, peer
reviews, and other reputable
sites or books.

First, complete every problem in the problem set Word document with answers to e

First, complete every problem in the problem set Word document with answers to e

First, complete every problem in the problem set Word document with answers to every question. Some of the questions you will have already worked through for the videos in the group portion, and some of the questions you will have guidance from your group members (via their videos) but you may or may not agree with their approach or answers. Answer every question and show your work! Second, write a learning reflection (1 paragraph, about 250 words) on what the overall experience of working on the problems as a group and recording and viewing others’ videos was like: what did you enjoy? What did you find challenging?
The individual portion will be submitted as a Word or PDF document; “showing your work” means writing out the formula, if you used one, and writing out the steps you took if the problem has multiple steps.

Unique Aspects of Health Services & Financial Management in Saudi Arabia There a

Unique Aspects of Health Services & Financial Management in Saudi Arabia
There a

Unique Aspects of Health Services & Financial Management in Saudi Arabia
There are a number of unique factors relating to the health services sector:
Compare the two types of accounting functions.
Describe how the accounting functions affect operational oversight.
How do these unique features affect the financial management of the sector?
Use academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to thi

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to thi

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Program 1: Reducing Drug Use Overdose Rates in New York City.*
In June 2022, the New York City (NYC) Department of Health and Mental Hygiene reported that a person dies from a drug overdose in NYC every three hours (NYC Health 2022). With high rates of overdose deaths in NYC and the increasing risk of dangerous opioids contributing to these overdoses, there is a need to establish protective mechanisms for this vulnerable population.
Overdose prevention centers (OPCs) are like syringe service programs in that they provide safe spaces for sterile needle exchanges, harm reduction services, and health care referrals. However, OPCs have the added service of being a supervised injection site. These sites are overseen by health care professionals to help reverse overdoses when needed. Though OPCs have been implemented in other countries globally with success, these sites have remained under consideration in the United States (US).
In November of 2021, the nation’s first OPC site (privately funded) was opened in NYC in two Manhattan neighborhoods. With recent increases in opioid-related overdose deaths across the nation, supervised injection sites have the potential to save lives and get people who inject drugs (PWIDs) connected to necessary health care services. The goal of the program is to reduce overdose deaths in the two Manhattan neighborhoods by 15% in the first year of program implementation. Additionally, the program aims to conduct health care assessments on 40% of PWIDs that utilize the services of the center. By engaging with a vulnerable population in a meaningful way, the OPC site hopes to establish a positive rapport among the community and among the NYC Health Department to garner further financial support and scaling of services to additional neighborhoods.
*Based on a real program but the goals were constructed for the purposes of this assignment.
Instructions: Read Program 1 above, then complete the methods section and study design section addressing each component, some information is provided below
Methods:
Sampling and elgibility – how many participants will complete the evaluation, and how will they be identified (randomly, systematically, convenience, purposive)
Program Description: This section includes program objectives, provides a detailed description of program components (intervention activities), as well as the program’s strategies, content, implementers, and setting(s).
Objectives (SMART): The narrative should begin with the program’s long-term health objective, intermediate behavioral objective(s) and immediate short-term objectives (at least 2)
Logic Model Completed in its entirety (use template provided)
Study Design:
Design a quasi-experimental design (be sure to include design notation and a description of the design)
Include rationale for the chosen design and address:
Threats to validity and if/how they will be addressed
Anticipated challenges
Recommended solutions to meet those challenges
Correct grammar, professional formatting, and proofreading of paper
Paper is complete, clear, comprehensive and follows instructions/includes all sections noted in syllabus; paper flow is logical and intuitive.
Paper is appropriately and adequately cited and referenced in APA 7th edition citations.
No more than 2 pages not including the logic model
Paper Clarity and Formatting:
Requirements: 2 full pages from top to bottom Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages, plus the complete logic model | .doc file
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to use in-text citations.
Please be sure to use credible or scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words: Share an experience when you

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:
Share an experience when you

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:
Share an experience when you have failed forward in a collaborative project. Share an experience when you have not failed forward in a collaborative project. What would you have done differently? What learning from this experience can you implement immediately?

ScenarioYour annual review is approaching. Your state has a new Governor and a n

ScenarioYour annual review is approaching. Your state has a new Governor and a n

ScenarioYour annual review is approaching. Your state has a new Governor and a new Director of Public Health. You had been a senior manager over the Environmental Services Division during the last administration. Although you were looking to advance, the former Director thought your background was too narrow. This is your opportunity to present your career plan and make a case for moving to a Director position at some point in the future. The review is scheduled for 30 minutes, so you will need to make your points as concise as possible.
InstructionsIn a Word document, put together an outline of key points with examples that include:
Who you are as a leader
How you have performed in your current role, building on past experiences
How environmental services gave you a broader perspective of leadership, community relations, and communication
Your strengths as they relate to public health leadership
Steps you have taken to develop your own career
Your short-term and long-term career goals
The areas you would like the opportunity to develop

This assignment should not be taken by someone who is not knowledgeable about t

This assignment should not be taken by someone who is not knowledgeable about t

This assignment should not be taken by someone who is not knowledgeable about the subject
Complete this assignment according to the directions provided below.
Overview
The use of quantitative and qualitative data in a single study is referred to as a mixed methods approach. The quantitative survey data help to identify health-related trends and patterns within the sample group. Qualitative data complement the quantitative element and help to determine why and how a phenomenon exists. The cumulative findings can then help public health professionals form a conclusion about the health issue and inform future public health research, policy, and practice. The content that you create for this assignment is similar to the steps you would take as a public health professional to create and disseminate a manuscript for publication.
In this assignment, you will conduct a retrospective analysis of the publicly available Titanic Datasets. The purpose of this assignment is to analyze qualitative and quantitative data to answer the following research question: What were the causes/mechanisms that led individuals on the Titanic to survive or perish? Examples of explanatory variables that may lead to higher probability of surviving on the Titanic are class, gender, physical strength, social ties, cabin location, etc.
Please note there is inherent bias in those who provided a testimony, because it only includes those that survived.
Background Information
The Titanic hit an iceberg on April 14, 1912, at 11:40 p.m. and sunk completely about 2 hours and 40 minutes later.
A total of 2207 individuals were on board at the time of the collision and only 710 survived, despite the fact that the lifeboats could have saved 1178, so they had been used at only 60% of their capacity.
The survival rates of individuals differed greatly according sex, classes, and types of crew.
For this assignment, you will use:
The quantitative Titanic dataset.
Qualitative testimonials from either Boat 1, 6, or 16.
Note: You will conduct the analyses for Parts 1 and 2. You will then use this information to write Part 3: Mixed Methods Paper
Part 1: Quantitative Analysis
Review the “Quantitative Titanic Dataset” and the accompanying “Codebook.” Consider what descriptive and inferential statistics you will conduct to help answer the research question.
Prepare the data to complete the analysis.
Using SPSS, conduct descriptive statistics to summarize the sample.
Using SPSS, select appropriate quantitative inferential statistical tests to analyze the data to answer the research question.
Part 2: Qualitative Analysis:
Select testimonials from one boat to review by using the Boat 1, Boat 6, or Boat 16 zip files.
Based on your findings in Part 1 (Quantitative Analysis), read and review testimonials from the boat. Code the transcripts and identify at least three key themes.
Part 3: Mixed Methods Paper
Prepare a 1,250-1,500-word paper to address the following. Headers should be used based on the component structure outlined below:
Introduction
Discuss the relationship between socioeconomic status and health from a general perspective.
Summarize the purpose of this research study and the proposed research question.
Quantitative Analysis
Methods
Describe the variables used in the analysis.
Describe the descriptive and inferential statistical tests that was conducted.
Identify the software that was used to conduct the analysis.
Results
Summarize the sample using the results of the descriptive statistics.
Describe the main outcomes of the inferential statistical analysis. Discuss the statistical significance of the results.
Include at least two tables and two figures to support the results.
Qualitative Analysis
Methods
Describe the process used to analyze the qualitative data.
Results
Summarize the results of the qualitative analysis from the selected boat testimonials. Discuss at least three key themes.
Discuss what methods you would employ to analyze the remaining transcripts from all 20 boats/vessels.
Discussion
Interpret the quantitative and qualitative study results in relation to the related literature and research question.
Explain what implications this has on future public health policy and programs.
Discuss the overall study limitations.
General Requirements
You are required to cite to a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and public health content.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:
MPH
2.2: Select quantitative and qualitative data collection methods appropriate for a given public health context.
2.3: Analyze quantitative and qualitative data using biostatistics, informatics, computer-based programming, and software, as appropriate.
2.4: Interpret results of data analysis for public health research, policy, or practice.
MSN Public Health Nursing
6.3: Interpret results of data analysis for public health research, policy, or practice.