Category: Public health

Assessment task 1 – Policy analysis
‘Policy analysis is a core skill for all hea

Assessment task 1 – Policy analysis
‘Policy analysis is a core skill for all health practitioners who need to understand how their work is funded, how policy decisions impact on their work and how policy can be shaped to build better systems for the promotion of good health for all’ (Keleher 2016 p299)
Introduction
An important set of competencies for people working in health promotion or public health is to recognise ways in which policy gatekeepers and interest groups manage agendas while obscuring their underlying focus on values and negating either good evidence or persuasive arguments (MacDougall and DeLeeuw 2007). In analysing policy, it is crucial to ask whose interests will be served (or threatened) by the implementation of a policy and to consider groups that have no power or influence to affect policy (Baum 2016).
A valuable skill for people working in health promotion or public health is the ability to critically ‘read’ policy. This is important for two reasons:
To enable you to implement the policy with confidence knowing it is in the best interests of the population group for whom it is intended.
To enable you to articulate the shortcomings of the policy and advocate for policy change (which you will do in AT2 and AT3).
As Cheung, Mirzaei and Leeder (2010) state, ‘The development of policy documents is one part of the policy process that enables goals, opportunities, obligations and resources to be recognised in a concrete form and, through careful analysis of the documents…and the extent to which a policy adheres to certain principles, such as stakeholder and legislative support and goal clarity, may be ascertained’. (p406)
To assist you to develop your themes (or criteria) for analysing policy, seminar activities and readings from weeks 2 – 6 will concentrate on developing tools for analysing a variety of policy documents and proposals. There will be a specific focus on the progressive weekly development of your criteria and analysis of the policy, which will look similar to Cheung, Mirzaei and Leeder (p.409) and Bastian (2011 p.112)
To complete this assignment successfully you need to engage with the seminar exercises and the related literature as well as carefully read through the rubric. Seminar time will also be allocated to the discussion of this task. Unit Learning Outcomes
ULO1 Conceptualise policy, policy design and the policy making process to critically appraise policy documents for their capacity to effectively provide optimum public health outcomes and the reciprocal role of informing and being informed by health promotion and sustainability principles and frameworks.
ULO2 Identify and evaluate the role of values, political ideologies, stakeholder influence, types of evidence and power influences, which impact the policy making process in relation to health promotion, public health and health inequalities, inclusive of an environmentally sustainable context.
ULO3 Compare and evaluate the role of Federal, State and local governments in the provision of health services and their policy contexts and develop political persuasion techniques, which have the potential to make changes in public health and health promotion.
You are required to…
Choose ONE policy from the options listed further below.
Come up with three themes for analysing your policy (through developing questions based on the weekly unit readings)
Apply these to your chosen policy (assessing the policy with your questions to determine if the policy is the best we could hope for)
Compare the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion (https://www.who.int/teams/health-promotion/enhanced-wellbeing/first-global-conference) to your chosen policy to assess its health promotion capacity.
This will provide you with the basis for producing a report critically evaluating the efficacy of your chosen policy to address the health issue for its related population group. Policy option:
https://d2l.deakin.edu.au/content/enforced/1422375-HSH302_TRI-1_2024/HSH302%202024/AT1%20Policy%20analysis%202024/Policies%20for%20AT1/National%20mens%20health%20strategy%202020-2030.pdf?isCourseFile=true&ou=1422375
Breakdown of each section
1. Introduction – 225 words (5 marks)
a. Provide a background and rationale for why policy analysis is important for promoting health.
b. Provide a brief outline of the selected policy.
2. Develop criteria for analysing policy – 450 words (12 marks)
This will include three criteria headings. Under each one, you will develop questions or prompts to assist with your policy analysis. Each criterion rationale needs to be supported by evidence from the unit readings. 3. Policy document analysis utilising your criteria for analysing policy – 600 words (15 marks)
Essentially this involves interrogating your chosen policy with the set of criteria headings and questions/prompts you have developed and determining how the policy has fulfilled each criterion. It is important to provide evidence from your policy, as well as unit readings, to support your policy analysis statements. 4. Evaluation of the health promotion capacity of the policy under review – 225 words (5 marks)
Utilising the WHO Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, assess your chosen policy’s capacity to promote population health. Use examples from the policy to indicate the extent to which the policy fulfils the criteria from the Charter.
5. Referencing and presentation (3 marks)
Ensure your work is well written and articulate and that you have used APA7 referencing.
Below is a arecording outlining AT1. Here is a copy of the slides in PDF as well as the rubric.
Here are some sample criteria and questions you can use or re-word to suit your own ideas. You only have to reference questions that are taken word for word from the readings. Here is a template to help you draft your AT1. We will work on this in seminars.
Submission details
Due date: Thursday March 28th by 8:00pm
Word count: 1500 words (+/- 10%)
Weighting: 40% of total unit marks
Group or individual submission: Individual
Referencing style: APA7 – refer to the Deakin Guide to APA7 referencing. In third year units, we expect referencing to be of a high standard.
Minimum 12 references required.
Included in the word count: in-text citations, subheadings, all written work
NOT included in the word count: questions for criteria, cover page, contents page, references list, tables or figures

What is the task?
You are required to design a needs assessment plan (on a topic

What is the task?
You are required to design a needs assessment plan (on a topic chosen from the list below) that could realistically be conducted in a real-life setting. You need to consider what information you would need to collect, from which group/s in the community, and the most feasible methods for collecting the information.
You are expected to explain and discuss the findings of your research into the topic using the most relevant and up-to-date secondary data.
In outlining the process of your needs assessment you are encouraged to refer to one of the planning frameworks discussed in week 1 (or more than one if you find elements of them you would like to combine). Please note that the planning frameworks cover the entire process for a program plan, so for this assessment task you are only required to focus on the needs assessment steps/section of your chosen framework.
You will not be doing any actual primary data collection (only secondary) but when you outline your proposed primary data collection methods, you will need to include a rationale for why you have chosen these methods and support this with evidence. For example, if you choose to use focus groups to collect information from youth in rural areas, explain why this method was chosen and why it is the most appropriate for that particular group. Your ideas need to be evidence-based and referenced clearly. It is really important that you watch and listen to the narrated PowerPoint below because it covers more specific detail about the assessment task (slides are in PDF HERE)- attached below The AT1 rubric is a document you need to refer to before beginning your work and it is HERE- attached below
Topics for assessment tasks (this will be your topic for all 3 assessment tasks): – Topic 3: STIs amongst people aged 15-29
Each topic relates to a current prominent health concern or topic in Australia, covering a range of issues and population groups and accommodating diverse interests from students in different courses. They are also broad topics, so you may need to consider and specify the scope of your topic. For example, we strongly recommend you focus on a particular Local Government Area (LGA) to ‘hypothetically’ conduct your needs assessment (and therefore your program down the track). Click HERE (attached below) for a map of the LGAs in Victoria. Or you could focus on a particular population group. For example, for topic 1, you might want to focus on bushfires and the mental health of children in bushfire affected communities of Victoria. Another example could be, for topic 3, that you choose to focus on STIs amongst males in years 11 and 12. You can shape these topics how you like – just remember that the findings from your needs assessment will guide the ideas for your program, so as you do your research have in the back of your mind that you will be going on to develop a program to address these findings (to tackle the issue).
Why are we doing this?
Undertaking a needs assessment is the essential process of finding out the contextual information about a community and the first fundamental step in designing and running health programs in a community. For those studying health promotion as a major in Health Sciences, or if you’re doing the PH/HP degree, understanding the process of a health needs assessment and being able to conduct one, are part of the Core Competencies for Health Promotion Practice set out by the Australian Health Promotion Association (AHPA) and the newer Core Competencies and Professional Standards for Health Promotion set out by the International Union of Health Promotion and Education (IUHPE). In completing this assessment task you will develop the skills to meet several of the other core competencies, including those relating to research, knowledge and communication and public health in general.
Links to ULOs and GLOs This task links directly to, and assesses Unit Learning Outcome 2. It also contributes toward the Deakin Graduate Learning Outcomes (GLOs) of Discipline-specific knowledge and capabilities (GLO1), Communication (GLO2), Digital literacy (GLO3), Critical thinking (GLO4) and self-management (GLO6).
Summary of requirements
Topic: Health needs assessment plan
Format: Written plan
Length: 1200 words (+/- 10%)
Unit assessment weighting: 35%
Due date: Thursday, March 28th by 8:00pm via the assignment dropbox Referencing style: APA7. The minimum number of references is 12.
NOT included in the word count: cover/title page, headings, tables/figures/charts, reference list, appendices.
INCLUDED in the word count: all other written material and in-text citations

Do not copy off ChatGPT and Any AI and use your own words and your own work. Ful

Do not copy off ChatGPT and Any AI and use your own words and your own work. Fully answer each question. 1) Discuss the different levels of the Social Ecological Model. Use the 4 levels that we use for the class. In your discussion include examples of a health behavior and how the theory would apply at each level. ( Answer should be 1.5 pages)
The 4 levels that will be used will be intrapersonal (or individual), Interpersonal (or relational), Community, and Policy (Societal). You will find the information in the document Lecture 2 Socio-ecological model Page 17 and Pages 11 -14). 2) Consider the Theory of Planned Behavior. How are each of the constructs different, and how are they all related to intention and behavior? ( Answer should be 1.5 pages)
The constructs that needs to be talked about is attitude, Subjective norms, Percieved control, intention to perform behavior and Behavior. You can find informations on this in the document lecture-3 theory of planned behavior page 11. 3) Explain the different stages of the stages of change theory – the ones discussed in class. Pick a health topic and show how you would stage someone at each level. ( Answer should be 1.5 pages)
The stages that needs to be discussed will be pre-contemplation, contemplation, Preparation, action, maintenance. You can find Information on this in the attached document lecture 4 change theory. Pages 13 and 14. 4) What is the underlying premise of social network theory? Explain some of the key analytic metrics discussed in class for the overall components of a network (Density, Centrality, homophily, and reciprocity). How can these relate to health behaviors? ( Answer should be 1.5 pages)
You can find information on attached document lecture 6, Social Network Theory, pages 16 – 27
5) Explain the 5 adopter categories from the DOI theory in your own words. How are these related to the communication channels within the diffusion of ideas? ( Answer should be 1.5 pages)
You can find information about this on the attached document Lecture 7 DOI page 25

Appraisal Tool The effective evaluation of employee performance depends, to a c

Appraisal Tool The effective evaluation of employee performance depends, to a certain degree, on the tool that is utilized. Based on that statement, in this Critical Thinking Assignment students will create a one-page Performance Management Form that can be used in an organization. To accomplish this task, complete the following:
Choose any organization in Saudi Arabia that you are familiar with, either one you have been employed with or have studied/researched.
Choose an assessment template that you find beneficial/advantageous (note: typing “assessment” or “evaluation” format into Google will bring hundreds of different templates for you to choose). Students can also use one utilized in their current/previous workplace, or one they are familiar with.
Using that template as a guide, create your own assessment tool you would propose to evaluate any employee/position in that organization (for instance, you may choose to evaluate an employee in finance). Be clear about:
The assessment/evaluation criteria important in your review.
The rating categories (e.g., superior, meets expectations, etc.)
An appropriate mix/combination of check-box assessment criteria and short answers.
Please post the assessment template you utilized as a guide along with your own completed assessment tool.
Your form should meet the following structural requirements:
2 pages in length, maximum
No need for in-text citations.
The assessment tool must be your own work, though you may follow the template/outline of those found via Google.
You are strongly encouraged to submit all assignments to the Turnitin Originality Check prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment to the Originality Check tool, review the Turnitin Originality Check Student Guide.
Be sure to support any statement made in your form, and cite any statement and/or words/phrases that you are utilizing from other sources.

Discuss in powerpoint presentation, Ethical implications in medical privacy and

Discuss in powerpoint presentation, Ethical implications in medical privacy and -Examine the elements of tort law and medical malpractice in Saudi Arabia Note:
Your discussion should be a minimum of 15 slides or more if you need.
Use proper references in APA style.

Discuss in powerpoint presentation, Ethical implications in medical privacy and

Discuss in powerpoint presentation, Ethical implications in medical privacy and -Examine the elements of tort law and medical malpractice in Saudi Arabia Note:
Your discussion should be a minimum of 15 slides or more if you need.
Use proper references in APA style.

Word format only
– Use clear and concise language throughout the essay (12 Time

Word format only
– Use clear and concise language throughout the essay (12 Time Roman- One and a half spacing).
– Ensure that your arguments are well-supported by evidence and logical reasoning.
– Pay attention to your essay’s organization, structure, and flow.
– Proofread and edit your work for grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
– Avoid plagiarism by adequately citing all sources used in your essay
This Essay is designed to assess your knowledge and understanding of health insurance from a comprehensive perspective.
You must write an essay on Health Insurance Marketing In Saudia Arabia, showcasing your ability to gather and analyze data, present your findings, engage in critical thinking, and provide recommendations for further studies. The essay should be a minimum of 10 pages long and include at least two tables and two figures. The structure of the essay should adhere to the following guidelines:
1. Introduction (Background) [Minimum two pages]
– Provide a brief overview of the chosen health insurance subject.
– Explain the significance and relevance of the subject in the context of health administration.
– Clearly state the objectives and scope of your essay.
2. Methods [Minimum 1 page]
– Describe the research methods and data collection techniques employed in your study.
– Justify your choice of methods and explain how they contribute to achieving the essay’s objectives.
– Ensure that the methodology is appropriate for the research question at hand.
3. Results [Minimum 2 pages]
– Present your findings in a logical and structured manner.
– Use appropriate tables and figures to present relevant data.
– Analyze and interpret the results objectively and accurately.
– Demonstrate your ability to synthesize and communicate complex information effectively.
4. Discussion [Minimum 2 pages]
– Analyze the implications of your findings about the chosen health insurance subject.
– Evaluate the strengths and limitations of your study.
– Relate your results to existing literature and theories.
– Engage in critical thinking and construct well-reasoned arguments supported by evidence.
5. Recommendations and Further Studies [Minimum 1 page]
– Based on your analysis, provide recommendations for health administrators and policymakers.
– Suggest areas for further research and studies related to the chosen health insurance subject.
– Justify the importance and potential impact of your recommendations and proposed studies.
6. Conclusion
– Summarize the key points discussed in your essay.
– Emphasize the significance of your study and its contribution to the field of health administration.
7. Recent References [Minimum 20]
– Include a reference list of at least 20 recent and relevant sources.
– Follow a consistent citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Harvard) throughout the essay.
you are required to incorporate data about Health Insurance Marketing within the Saudi health insurance system
Focus on your subject only.
No recent data no grade, No critical analysis no grade.

Word format only
– Use clear and concise language throughout the essay (12 Time

Word format only
– Use clear and concise language throughout the essay (12 Time Roman- One and a half spacing).
– Ensure that your arguments are well-supported by evidence and logical reasoning.
– Pay attention to your essay’s organization, structure, and flow.
– Proofread and edit your work for grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
– Avoid plagiarism by adequately citing all sources used in your essay
This Essay is designed to assess your knowledge and understanding of health insurance from a comprehensive perspective.
You must write an essay on Health Insurance Marketing In Saudia Arabia, showcasing your ability to gather and analyze data, present your findings, engage in critical thinking, and provide recommendations for further studies. The essay should be a minimum of 10 pages long and include at least two tables and two figures. The structure of the essay should adhere to the following guidelines:
1. Introduction (Background) [Minimum two pages]
– Provide a brief overview of the chosen health insurance subject.
– Explain the significance and relevance of the subject in the context of health administration.
– Clearly state the objectives and scope of your essay.
2. Methods [Minimum 1 page]
– Describe the research methods and data collection techniques employed in your study.
– Justify your choice of methods and explain how they contribute to achieving the essay’s objectives.
– Ensure that the methodology is appropriate for the research question at hand.
3. Results [Minimum 2 pages]
– Present your findings in a logical and structured manner.
– Use appropriate tables and figures to present relevant data.
– Analyze and interpret the results objectively and accurately.
– Demonstrate your ability to synthesize and communicate complex information effectively.
4. Discussion [Minimum 2 pages]
– Analyze the implications of your findings about the chosen health insurance subject.
– Evaluate the strengths and limitations of your study.
– Relate your results to existing literature and theories.
– Engage in critical thinking and construct well-reasoned arguments supported by evidence.
5. Recommendations and Further Studies [Minimum 1 page]
– Based on your analysis, provide recommendations for health administrators and policymakers.
– Suggest areas for further research and studies related to the chosen health insurance subject.
– Justify the importance and potential impact of your recommendations and proposed studies.
6. Conclusion
– Summarize the key points discussed in your essay.
– Emphasize the significance of your study and its contribution to the field of health administration.
7. Recent References [Minimum 20]
– Include a reference list of at least 20 recent and relevant sources.
– Follow a consistent citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Harvard) throughout the essay.
you are required to incorporate data about Health Insurance Marketing within the Saudi health insurance system
Focus on your subject only.
No recent data no grade, No critical analysis no grade.

Appraisal Tool The effective evaluation of employee performance depends, to a c

Appraisal Tool The effective evaluation of employee performance depends, to a certain degree, on the tool that is utilized. Based on that statement, in this Critical Thinking Assignment students will create a one-page Performance Management Form that can be used in an organization. To accomplish this task, complete the following:
Choose any organization in Saudi Arabia that you are familiar with, either one you have been employed with or have studied/researched.
Choose an assessment template that you find beneficial/advantageous (note: typing “assessment” or “evaluation” format into Google will bring hundreds of different templates for you to choose). Students can also use one utilized in their current/previous workplace, or one they are familiar with.
Using that template as a guide, create your own assessment tool you would propose to evaluate any employee/position in that organization (for instance, you may choose to evaluate an employee in finance). Be clear about:
The assessment/evaluation criteria important in your review.
The rating categories (e.g., superior, meets expectations, etc.)
An appropriate mix/combination of check-box assessment criteria and short answers.
Please post the assessment template you utilized as a guide along with your own completed assessment tool.
Your form should meet the following structural requirements:
2 pages in length, maximum
No need for in-text citations.
The assessment tool must be your own work, though you may follow the template/outline of those found via Google.
You are strongly encouraged to submit all assignments to the Turnitin Originality Check prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment to the Originality Check tool, review the Turnitin Originality Check Student Guide.
Be sure to support any statement made in your form, and cite any statement and/or words/phrases that you are utilizing from other sources.

Using the week’s readings as references, cite what you see as the five major hum

Using the week’s readings as references, cite what you see as the five major human development challenges facing the African American community. Rank order these challenges from least to most critical and justify your top choice
Reference #3
https://www.inmotionaame.org/
Reference #4
https://nul.org/state-of-black-america