Category: Reading homework help

 Change the following topics into researchable questions. These are stated as g

 Change the following topics into researchable questions. These are stated as g

 Change the following topics into researchable questions. These are stated as general topics and it’s important that you can recognize the difference between a topic and a research question. Review Chapter 2 before completing this assignment. Make sure to put the topic and your question in your response. It’s best just to copy and paste this then write your response to each. 
Class size and student achievement
Multicultural education at Thurgood Marshall Middle School 
Testing anxiety
Women college professors and tenure
Alcohol consumption on New Year’s Eve and Super Bowl Sunday
Single parents and affordable childcare 
Counseling style
Asian American students and positive stereotypes
The charter school movement in the 20th century
Diet and exercise

  Resource Evaluation General Description You will select one translation and o

  Resource Evaluation
General Description
You will select one translation and o

  Resource Evaluation
General Description
You will select one translation and one commentary.. For each, you will write a 200-250 word summary and evaluation of that resource in terms of its usefulness in responsible Bible reading.
Specific Requirements
Elements of the Paper
Your paper will be 400-500 words long. The first half will cover a Bible translation, and the second half cover a commentary or online resource. You do not need to cite or footnote your sources for this paper.
Page 1: Translation
Describe the history of the translation (when it was published, whether it is a revision or update of a previous translation), the translation committee (its general makeup), and the translation philosophy. 

You are welcome to use easy-to-access sources like Wikipedia and BibleGateway.com.

Explain where this translation falls on the translation philosophy spectrum (from formal equivalence [literal], to functional equivalence [dynamic], to free). See Fee & Stuart, p. 45. page link below.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=904238f460&attid=0.4&permmsgid=msg-f:1802956016865759359&th=190562f1e2efd07f&view=att&disp=safe
Give an example of where this translation’s philosophy makes a difference by giving the wording to a verse and comparing it to another translation.
Evaluate the translation by discussing a way in which it could help or hinder responsible Bible reading.
Page 2: Commentary/Online Resource (See list of criteria in Fee & Stuart, pp. 276-277, for a good list of things to include) this are the links to pages below.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=904238f460&attid=0.1&permmsgid=msg-f:1802956016865759359&th=190562f1e2efd07f&view=att&disp=safehttps://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=904238f460&attid=0.2&permmsgid=msg-f:1802956016865759359&th=190562f1e2efd07f&view=att&disp=safehttps://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=904238f460&attid=0.3&permmsgid=msg-f:1802956016865759359&th=190562f1e2efd07f&view=att&disp=safe
Describe the author of the commentary. What is her/background and credentials? Is it part of a series? If so, is the series all by the same author?
Describe the type of commentary this is: exegetical, homiletical, or other.
Describe, as best you can, whether the commentary makes use of Hebrew and Greek, or whether it uses an English translation as its basis.
Describe how the author handles issues where multiple interpretations or conclusions are possible.
Evaluate the commentary by discussing a way in which it could help or hinder responsible Bible reading.
Feel free to pick from one of the resources listed in Fee & Stuart, pp. 279-290. found in the two links below.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=904238f460&attid=0.5&permmsgid=msg-f:1802956016865759359&th=190562f1e2efd07f&view=att&disp=safehttps://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=904238f460&attid=0.6&permmsgid=msg-f:1802956016865759359&th=190562f1e2efd07f&view=att&disp=safe
Format APA
Use all the instruction above with each link to the various pages of text you might look at. write by answering the following question above. i want it done 
400-500 words total
Clear titles/headings to mark your two sections
Free of spelling/grammatical errors
this is a sample paper of how i want it done. Sample PaperJosh KingcadeBIBL-4822Resource Evaluation: TranslationIn this section, I am evaluating the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV). This version was originally published in 1989 by the National Council of Churches, an ecumenical organization that is associated primarily with mainline denominations. It is an update of the Revised Standard Version (1952), which itself was an update of the American Standard Version (1901). The NRSV’s translation committee is composed of Protestants, Roman Catholics, Greek Orthodox, and even a Jewish scholar. The translation committee has aimed for a more formal equivalence (i.e., a literal translation), and because of this and the robust academic background of the committee, scholars often favor this translation. For example, the NRSV renders Genesis 1:2 as “while a wind from God swept over the face of the waters,” whereas the NIV reads “while a wind from God swept over the face of the waters.” The NRSV avoids the conclusion that the word for “spirit” (which can also mean breath or wind) is automatically a divine being, whereas the NIV draws the conclusion for the reader.One way the NRSV helps with responsible Bible reading is its focus on gender accuracy, being careful to use gender-specific words (e.g., man, brother, son) only when scripture is clearly referring only to one gender.Resource Evaluation: Commentary/Online ResourceIn this section, I am evaluating the Ezra-Nehemiah volume in the Teach the Text commentary series, written by Douglas J.E. Nykolaishen and Andrew J. Schmutzer.Nykolaishen earned a PhD from the University of Edinburgh, is an ordained minister, and serves as professor of biblical studies at Ouachita Baptist University. Schmutzer earned a PhD from Trinity International University and is professor of Bible at Moody Bible Institute. He has also published articles in scholarly journals. Both authors are well-suited to write an Old Testament commentary.This commentary is neither fully exegetical nor fully homiletical. It is not a rich scholarly work based on the Hebrew text and aimed at fellow scholars. Neither is it aimed fully at preachers. Rather, it is aimed at teachers. Each unit gives some important information about genre and context – not too much, but enough for a teacher preparing a lesson who might need some background information. There are some interpretive and theological insights included. The authors do not list every possible option for difficult texts, opting to give teachers the best middle-ground way forward. This approach is indeed helpful for volunteers who are, say, going to teach an adult Sunday school class and don’t have hours to prepare and whose classes don’t have time to chase every possibility. But this feature is of course limiting to those who want a deep dive into all possibilities.Each section closes with some ideas for illustrating the text, including stories, anecdotes, and historical illustrations.For example, in the section covering Ezra’s instructions on intermarriage (Ezra 10), the authors list some of the reasons why foreign marriages might have been theologically troubling for God and God’s people and how modern divorce is different that ancient Near Eastern divorce. The authors acknowledge how this might have seemed heartless. They frame this exclusive relationship between God and God’s people as a theological one, and they give some practical messages from this passage that might even apply to believers today. 

 Resource Evaluation General Description You will select one translation and on

 Resource Evaluation
General Description
You will select one translation and on

 Resource Evaluation
General Description
You will select one translation and one commentary.. For each, you will write a 200-250 word summary and evaluation of that resource in terms of its usefulness in responsible Bible reading.
Specific Requirements
Elements of the Paper
Your paper will be 400-500 words long. The first half will cover a Bible translation, and the second half cover a commentary or online resource. You do not need to cite or footnote your sources for this paper.
Page 1: Translation
Describe the history of the translation (when it was published, whether it is a revision or update of a previous translation), the translation committee (its general makeup), and the translation philosophy. 

You are welcome to use easy-to-access sources like Wikipedia and BibleGateway.com.

Explain where this translation falls on the translation philosophy spectrum (from formal equivalence [literal], to functional equivalence [dynamic], to free). See Fee & Stuart, p. 45. page link below.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=904238f460&attid=0.4&permmsgid=msg-f:1802956016865759359&th=190562f1e2efd07f&view=att&disp=safe
Give an example of where this translation’s philosophy makes a difference by giving the wording to a verse and comparing it to another translation.
Evaluate the translation by discussing a way in which it could help or hinder responsible Bible reading.
Page 2: Commentary/Online Resource (See list of criteria in Fee & Stuart, pp. 276-277, for a good list of things to include) this are the links to pages below.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=904238f460&attid=0.1&permmsgid=msg-f:1802956016865759359&th=190562f1e2efd07f&view=att&disp=safehttps://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=904238f460&attid=0.2&permmsgid=msg-f:1802956016865759359&th=190562f1e2efd07f&view=att&disp=safehttps://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=904238f460&attid=0.3&permmsgid=msg-f:1802956016865759359&th=190562f1e2efd07f&view=att&disp=safe
Describe the author of the commentary. What is her/background and credentials? Is it part of a series? If so, is the series all by the same author?
Describe the type of commentary this is: exegetical, homiletical, or other.
Describe, as best you can, whether the commentary makes use of Hebrew and Greek, or whether it uses an English translation as its basis.
Describe how the author handles issues where multiple interpretations or conclusions are possible.
Evaluate the commentary by discussing a way in which it could help or hinder responsible Bible reading.
Feel free to pick from one of the resources listed in Fee & Stuart, pp. 279-290. found in the two links below.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=904238f460&attid=0.5&permmsgid=msg-f:1802956016865759359&th=190562f1e2efd07f&view=att&disp=safehttps://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=904238f460&attid=0.6&permmsgid=msg-f:1802956016865759359&th=190562f1e2efd07f&view=att&disp=safe
Format APA
Use all the instruction above with each link to the various pages of text you might look at. write by answering the following question above. i want it done 
400-500 words total
Clear titles/headings to mark your two sections
Free of spelling/grammatical errors
this is a sample paper of how i want it done. Sample PaperJosh KingcadeBIBL-4822Resource Evaluation: TranslationIn this section, I am evaluating the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV). This version was originally published in 1989 by the National Council of Churches, an ecumenical organization that is associated primarily with mainline denominations. It is an update of the Revised Standard Version (1952), which itself was an update of the American Standard Version (1901). The NRSV’s translation committee is composed of Protestants, Roman Catholics, Greek Orthodox, and even a Jewish scholar. The translation committee has aimed for a more formal equivalence (i.e., a literal translation), and because of this and the robust academic background of the committee, scholars often favor this translation. For example, the NRSV renders Genesis 1:2 as “while a wind from God swept over the face of the waters,” whereas the NIV reads “while a wind from God swept over the face of the waters.” The NRSV avoids the conclusion that the word for “spirit” (which can also mean breath or wind) is automatically a divine being, whereas the NIV draws the conclusion for the reader.One way the NRSV helps with responsible Bible reading is its focus on gender accuracy, being careful to use gender-specific words (e.g., man, brother, son) only when scripture is clearly referring only to one gender.Resource Evaluation: Commentary/Online ResourceIn this section, I am evaluating the Ezra-Nehemiah volume in the Teach the Text commentary series, written by Douglas J.E. Nykolaishen and Andrew J. Schmutzer.Nykolaishen earned a PhD from the University of Edinburgh, is an ordained minister, and serves as professor of biblical studies at Ouachita Baptist University. Schmutzer earned a PhD from Trinity International University and is professor of Bible at Moody Bible Institute. He has also published articles in scholarly journals. Both authors are well-suited to write an Old Testament commentary.This commentary is neither fully exegetical nor fully homiletical. It is not a rich scholarly work based on the Hebrew text and aimed at fellow scholars. Neither is it aimed fully at preachers. Rather, it is aimed at teachers. Each unit gives some important information about genre and context – not too much, but enough for a teacher preparing a lesson who might need some background information. There are some interpretive and theological insights included. The authors do not list every possible option for difficult texts, opting to give teachers the best middle-ground way forward. This approach is indeed helpful for volunteers who are, say, going to teach an adult Sunday school class and don’t have hours to prepare and whose classes don’t have time to chase every possibility. But this feature is of course limiting to those who want a deep dive into all possibilities.Each section closes with some ideas for illustrating the text, including stories, anecdotes, and historical illustrations.For example, in the section covering Ezra’s instructions on intermarriage (Ezra 10), the authors list some of the reasons why foreign marriages might have been theologically troubling for God and God’s people and how modern divorce is different that ancient Near Eastern divorce. The authors acknowledge how this might have seemed heartless. They frame this exclusive relationship between God and God’s people as a theological one, and they give some practical messages from this passage that might even apply to believers today. 

 Choosing the perfect necklace is an art form that allows you to express your in

 Choosing the perfect necklace is an art form that allows you to express your in

 Choosing the perfect necklace is an art form that allows you to express your individuality and style. By considering your personal style, the occasion, neckline, length, comfort, and mixing different styles, you can find the necklace that perfectly complements your outfit and enhances your overall look. Remember, there are no strict rules in necklace picking, only guidelines to help you navigate the vast options available. So, embrace the process, have fun experimenting, and let your necklace be a reflection of your unique style and personality. 

  Paso 1 Select one of the images and/or digital artifacts you shared for [CR

 
Paso 1
Select one of the images and/or digital artifacts you shared for [CR

 
Paso 1
Select one of the images and/or digital artifacts you shared for [CRJ] 1 or related to [CRJ] 2 . Upload your image to the forum and include identifying data (author/creator, publication information, retrieval source, date etc…)
Paso 2
Briefly describe this image/artifact and its relationship to the reading. You may also discuss how you came across this image/artifact and why it stood out to you. You can write your description in the forum post or add a voice recording directly on the forum (each recording session allows for a maximum of two minutes).
Paso 3
Read and comment on a minimum of two (2) forum posts. You may leave a written or audio comment. 
Due by Tuesday, April 16th @11:45pm
Your chosen [CRJ] image, description and metadata
Comment on at least two (2) posts (please add comments first to posts that have not been responded to)

  Tyler The Creator Merch: Your Guide to Bold, Colorful Style If you’re a fan o

 
Tyler The Creator Merch: Your Guide to Bold, Colorful Style
If you’re a fan o

 
Tyler The Creator Merch: Your Guide to Bold, Colorful Style
If you’re a fan of Tyler, The Creator, you know his style is anything but ordinary.  From bright pastels to quirky graphics, his clothing is an extension of his creative and playful personality.  Want to bring some of that energy into your own wardrobe? Dive into the world of Tyler The Creator merch!
—> https://linksome.me/tylerthecreator26t/
Where to Find the Best Tyler The Creator Merch

GOLF WANG: The Official Source GOLF WANG, Tyler’s own brand, is your top destination for the newest merch drops and exclusive items.

Online Marketplaces: Amazon, Etsy, etc. For a wider range, browse sites like Amazon and Etsy. You might find fan-made designs or older pieces.

Specialty Retailers and Fan Stores Dedicated merch stores occasionally carry Tyler, The Creator apparel alongside other musicians and pop culture figures.
Must-Have Pieces for Any Tyler, The Creator Fan

The Classic, Colorful Tees: These are the staples! Vibrant tees with bold graphics or Tyler’s iconic album artwork are where it’s at.

Cozy and Cool Hoodies: Nothing beats a comfy hoodie, especially one with a playful Tyler, The Creator twist. Look for pastel shades or statement designs.

Limited Edition Apparel and Accessories: Keep an eye out for special collaborations or tour merch. These items are often highly sought after.
—> https://linksome.me/tylerthecreator26t/
How to Style Tyler The Creator Merch

Embracing the Bold and Playful: Don’t be afraid to clash colors, mix patterns, and have fun! Tyler’s style is all about self-expression.

Streetwear Meets High Fashion: Pair a graphic tee with tailored pants and sneakers for an effortlessly cool street-style vibe with a dash of high fashion.

Showcasing Your Love for a Unique Artist: Let your Tyler, The Creator merch be a conversation starter. It’s a great way to connect with fellow fans!
FAQ about Tyler The Creator Merch

How do I know if merch is authentic? Check the tags, the quality of the print, and always purchase from reputable sellers.

Where can I find vintage Tyler, The Creator items? Scour online marketplaces or thrift stores – you might just find a gem!

What’s the deal with sizing? GOLF WANG tends to run a bit oversized, so consult their size charts or even consider sizing down for a trendier fit.
—> https://www.threads.net/@tylerthecreator26t
Conclusion
Whether you’re a diehard Tyler, The Creator fan or just love his unique, colorful aesthetic, his merch is a fantastic way to add a touch of his playful personality to your everyday style. With so many options to choose from, there’s something for everyone. Remember to be bold, experiment, and most importantly, have fun expressing yourself through fashion!  Now, what are you waiting for? Go out and snag that Tyler, The Creator tee you’ve been eyeing!