How does the structure of the excerpt help the author make his argument about l
How does the structure of the excerpt help the author make his argument about life in California for Dust Bowl migrants?
Category: Reading homework help
How does the structure of the excerpt help the author make his argument about l
How does the structure of the excerpt help the author make his argument about l
How does the structure of the excerpt help the author make his argument about life in California for Dust Bowl migrants?
Baccarat adalah permainan untung-untungan yang mudah dipelajari. Sebelum mendal
Baccarat adalah permainan untung-untungan yang mudah dipelajari. Sebelum mendal
Baccarat adalah permainan untung-untungan yang mudah dipelajari. Sebelum mendalami strategi untuk menang, penting untuk memahami aturan dasar permainan. Permainan ini melibatkan dua tangan, tangan pemain, dan tangan bankir. Tujuan dari permainan ini adalah untuk memprediksi tangan mana yang akan memiliki nilai total lebih tinggi, dengan nilai tertinggi yang mungkin adalah sembilan. Permainan ini dimainkan dengan enam hingga delapan dek kartu, dan setiap kartu memiliki nilai poin. Kartu dari dua hingga sembilan bernilai nilai nominalnya, sedangkan kartu as bernilai satu poin, dan puluhan, jack, ratu, dan raja bernilai nol poin.
Untuk meningkatkan peluang Anda menang di baccarat, penting untuk memahami berbagai jenis taruhan yang dapat dipasang. Ada tiga jenis taruhan dalam baccarat: taruhan bankir, taruhan pemain, dan taruhan seri. Taruhan bankir memiliki house edge terendah dan dianggap sebagai taruhan teraman, sedangkan taruhan seri memiliki pembayaran tertinggi namun juga merupakan taruhan paling berisiko. Disarankan untuk fokus pada taruhan sederhana seperti taruhan dewa poker player atau banker, karena mereka memiliki kemungkinan menang lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan taruhan seri. Memahami peluang dan pembayaran setiap taruhan juga penting dalam mengembangkan strategi kemenangan.
Memilih meja yang tepat juga penting dalam menang di baccarat. Disarankan untuk memilih meja dengan komisi terendah dan taruhan minimum yang wajar. Penting juga untuk mempelajari dan menerapkan strategi dasar seperti taruhan bankir, pemain, atau seri. Namun, penting untuk menghindari bertaruh pada seri karena peluang menangnya rendah. Terakhir, mengelola uang Anda sangat penting dalam permainan perjudian apa pun, termasuk baccarat. Dianjurkan untuk menetapkan anggaran dan menaatinya untuk menghindari kehilangan lebih banyak uang daripada yang Anda mampu kehilangan. Dengan memahami dasar-dasar baccarat, memilih meja yang tepat, dan menerapkan strategi dewapoker yang efektif, Anda dapat meningkatkan peluang Anda untuk menang secara konsisten.
Strategi Baccarat yang Terbukti untuk Kemenangan yang Konsisten
Sistem Martingale adalah strategi baccarat yang terkenal dan efektif untuk kemenangan yang konsisten. Sistem taruhan ini didasarkan pada prinsip menggandakan taruhan Anda setelah setiap kekalahan, dengan tujuan untuk menutup semua kerugian sebelumnya dan mendapatkan keuntungan ketika Anda akhirnya menang. Ide di balik strategi ini adalah pada akhirnya, Anda akan menang dan menutup semua kerugian Anda sebelumnya, ditambah sejumlah keuntungan tambahan. Namun, penting untuk dicatat bahwa sistem ini memerlukan dana yang besar dan bisa berisiko jika Anda mengalami kekalahan beruntun yang lama.
Strategi baccarat populer lainnya untuk kemenangan yang konsisten adalah Sistem Fibonacci. Sistem ini didasarkan pada deret Fibonacci, yaitu deret matematika yang setiap angkanya merupakan penjumlahan dari dua angka sebelumnya. Dalam baccarat, sistem Fibonacci melibatkan penempatan taruhan sesuai dengan urutannya, dengan setiap taruhan merupakan jumlah dari dua taruhan sebelumnya. Misalnya, jika taruhan pertama Anda adalah $1, taruhan kedua Anda adalah $1, taruhan ketiga Anda adalah $2, taruhan keempat Anda adalah $3, dan seterusnya. Sistem ini dianggap kurang berisiko dibandingkan Sistem Martingale, karena tidak memerlukan penggandaan taruhan Anda setelah setiap kekalahan.
Sistem 1-3-2-6 adalah strategi baccarat lainnya yang telah terbukti menghasilkan kemenangan yang konsisten. Sistem ini melibatkan penempatan serangkaian taruhan di mana Anda meningkatkan ukuran taruhan Anda setelah setiap kemenangan. Secara spesifik urutannya adalah sebagai berikut: 1 unit, 3 unit, 2 unit, dan 6 unit. Jika Anda memenangkan keempat taruhan, Anda akan mendapat untung 12 unit. Namun, jika Anda kalah dalam salah satu taruhan, Anda kembali ke awal urutan. Sistem ini dianggap kurang berisiko dibandingkan Sistem Martingale, karena tidak melibatkan penggandaan taruhan Anda setelah setiap kekalahan. Namun, penting untuk dicatat bahwa sistem ini masih memerlukan dana yang besar dan bisa berisiko jika Anda mengalami kekalahan beruntun yang lama. Untuk itu anda bisa main di situs kartu poker karena disini memeliki tingkat kekalahan yang rendah untuk para pemain.
Tips Tambahan Menang di Baccarat
Salah satu aspek terpenting untuk menang di baccarat secara konsisten adalah manajemen bankroll. Penting untuk menetapkan anggaran dan menaatinya, terlepas dari apakah Anda menang atau kalah. Strategi ini akan membantu Anda menghindari kehilangan lebih banyak uang daripada yang Anda mampu dan memastikan bahwa Anda memiliki cukup dana untuk terus bermain kartupoker asia dalam jangka panjang. Aturan praktis yang baik adalah menyisihkan sejumlah uang tertentu untuk setiap sesi dan menghindari mengeluarkan dana lain untuk terus bermain.
Tip penting lainnya untuk menang di baccarat adalah menghindari taruhan seri. Meskipun pembayaran untuk jenis taruhan ini mungkin menggiurkan, peluang menangnya jauh lebih rendah dibandingkan taruhan bankir atau pemain. Taruhan seri memiliki keunggulan lebih dari 14%, menjadikannya salah satu taruhan terburuk dalam permainan. Sebaliknya, fokuslah pada taruhan bankir atau pemain, yang memiliki house edge yang jauh lebih rendah dan probabilitas kemenangan yang lebih tinggi.
Berpegang teguh pada strategi dan mengetahui kapan harus berhenti juga merupakan faktor kunci dalam menang di baccarat. Sebelum Anda mulai bermain, putuskan strategi yang cocok untuk Anda dan pertahankan sepanjang permainan. Strategi ini dapat melibatkan peningkatan atau penurunan ukuran taruhan Anda berdasarkan kemenangan dan kekalahan Anda atau berfokus pada satu jenis taruhan. Selain itu, penting untuk mengetahui kapan harus berhenti, apakah Anda menang atau kalah. Sangat mudah untuk terjebak dalam kegembiraan permainan dan terus bermain, namun menetapkan batas untuk diri sendiri dan menaatinya dapat membantu Anda menghindari kerugian besar dan meningkatkan peluang Anda untuk menang dalam jangka panjang. Poin-poin: – Tetapkan anggaran dan patuhi anggaran tersebut untuk setiap sesi. – Hindari taruhan seri, yang memiliki house edge tinggi. – Fokus pada taruhan bankir atau pemain, yang memiliki house edge lebih rendah dan probabilitas kemenangan lebih tinggi. – Kembangkan strategi dan pertahankan sepanjang permainan. – Ketahui kapan harus berhenti, apakah Anda menang atau kalah.
In our exploration of the stereotypes specific to Italy, we often confronted the
In our exploration of the stereotypes specific to Italy, we often confronted the
In our exploration of the stereotypes specific to Italy, we often confronted the idea of race, especially in relation to Italy’s colonial histories, Italian emigration, and those from the Italian South. In your response work, choose one stereotype that you believe exemplifies the construction of race in the context of Italy. Why did you choose this example? What or whose race is being constructed and by whom? How might this stereotype inform, or even authorize, racism? What, if any, means have developed to protest and/or resist this stereotyping?
Requirements: 750-1,000 words (2-3 pages, double spaced); please upload as a Word/Pages document.
Book review: Chose between the “Power of One” by Frances Haugen or “Pornography
Book review: Chose between the “Power of One” by Frances Haugen or “Pornography
Book review: Chose between the “Power of One” by Frances Haugen or “Pornography and Public Health” by Emily Rothman.
Book Review Assignment: The Power of One by Frances Haugen (750 words)
Haugen notes that for some of the teens devoted to Instagram, the peer pressure generated by the visually focused app led to mental health and body-image problems, and in some cases, eating disorders and suicidal thoughts, the research leaked by Haugen showed. One internal study cited 13.5% of teen girls saying Instagram makes thoughts of suicide worse and 17% of teen girls saying it makes eating disorders worse.
Big picture, here is what your review should include:
1. Provide an introduction to the review, including bibliographic information and an overview of the memoir’s central premise.
2. Demonstrate an understanding of the memoir’s themes, these may include topics such as: Facebook transparency, accountability in tech, and the impact of social media on society. Discusses these themes with specific references to Haugen’s experiences.
3. Provide a critical analysis of Haugen’s arguments and the broader implications for the tech industry and society.
4. Discusses the effectiveness of Haugen’s narrative in conveying her message.
5. Use multiple, detailed examples from the memoir to support the analysis of Haugen’s experiences and the issues raised.
6. Ask yourself: is this review well-written with no grammatical errors and a clear, coherent structure that enhances the analysis?
Was in the book an insightful exploration of the inner workings of Facebook and the broader tech industry?
Did Haugen provide a detailed account of her journey from a humble background to becoming a whistleblower, revealing the harmful effects of Facebook’s algorithms and lack of transparency
How about the idea of a broader wisdom and the personal experiences Haugen shares? Was she effective in conveying the importance of these personal experiences?
Was the book an approachable exploration of complex topics such as algorithms and the potential harm of Facebook’s technologies?
Is the book and her writing a good resource for understanding the issues surrounding social media and how they could realistically be mitigated?
On the negative side did Haugen’s personal grievances sometimes overshadow the larger issues at hand?
Could we view the book more generally as a treatise on truth, with Haugen encouraging other tech employees to stand up against dishonesty?
What did the book tell us about the lack of transparency and harmful algorithms? How effectively did Haugen highlight the dangers of algorithmic systems that prioritize profit over the well-being of users?
What about her journey from idealism to Whistleblowing: Did the book detail Haugen’s personal journey, from her initial belief in the positive potential of social media to her decision to become a whistleblower after she recognized the platforms’ darker aspects and the misuse of algorithms?
What about the role of personal experiences? What?Haugen’s formative experiences, including her academic background, personal challenges, and moral convictions, and how did they play a significant role in her decision to expose Facebook’s unethical practices?
Can we consider the book a commentary on the impact of tech on democracy and society? What do Haugen’s revelations underscore the negative effects of Facebook’s products on children, the stoking of division, tell us about the weakening of democracy?
Does she effectively make a call for employee empowerment and transparency? Does the memoir effectively serve as a call to action for tech employees to stand up against dishonesty and for companies to embrace transparency to avoid fearing their employees and losing top talent?
Are there insights into corporate responsibility? Can we view Haugen’s story as a testament to the importance of corporate responsibility, human communication, and democracy, as well as the potential for individuals to create significant change?
Finally, what about harm to children? Haugen has pointed out that Facebook’s products can harm children’s mental health. This includes the impact on teenage girls, where the platform’s content and interaction dynamics can exacerbate mental health issues.
What about corporate lying? She states: “The company intentionally hides vital information from the public, from the U.S. government and from governments around the world,” Haugen said in her testimony. “The documents I have provided to Congress prove that Facebook has repeatedly misled the public about what its own research reveals about the safety of children, the efficacy of its artificial intelligence systems and its role in spreading divisive and extreme messages.”
Emily Rothman’s book, Pornography and Public Health, provides a exploration of the complex relationship between pornography and public health issues.
Big picture, here is what your review should include:
A. Provide an introduction to the review, including bibliographic information and an overview of the memoir’s central premise.
B. Demonstrate an understanding of the book’s themes.
C. Provide a critical analysis of Rothman’s arguments and the broader implications for individuals and society.
D. Discusses the effectiveness of Rothman’s narrative in conveying her message.
E. Use multiple, detailed examples from the book to support Rothman’s analyses experiences and the issues raised.
F. Provide a summary: Does Emily Rothman’s Pornography and Public Health represent a significant contribution to the ongoing debate about the role of pornography in society? Is it a balanced and evidence-based perspective on a contentious topic? Is it an important read for anyone interested in the intersection of media, gender, and public health?
G. Ask yourself: Is this review well-written with no grammatical errors and a clear, coherent structure that enhances the analysis?
Please choose among (several) of the following questions to frame your review:
1. Does the book explore the positive and negative effects of pornography? What does the author hope to accomplish by considering pornography to be a public health crisis despite the lack of governmental support for this idea in the US?
2. Does Rothman provide a successful overview of pornography viewers, the content they are likely to encounter, and how this content has evolved over time?
3. Is the author successful in describing the impact of pornography on various aspects of human behavior and health, including aggression, body image, and compulsive use, while also acknowledging the potential benefits of porn literacy in certain contexts?
4. Rothman’s approach is evidence-based. Is she successful on drawing on research and data analysis?
5. Rothman aims to offer meaningful guidance for practice and policy. Is she successful in suggesting ways to minimize possible harms associated with pornography?
6. The book covers a range of subtopics within pornography scholarship. Is it a comprehensive resource for understanding one of the most complicated issues in health and human behavior today?
7. Rothman’s main argument is that while pornography may have various impacts on individuals, it should not be characterized as a public health crisis, and public health approaches should be evidence-based and nuanced, considering both potential harms and benefits of pornography use. What do you think about this argument?
8. She advocates for harm reduction goals, such as motivating people to use less extreme pornography and less frequently, and increasing pornography literacy, rather than trying to end all use. Are these important goals?
9. Additional points you may wish to address:
a. Rothman’s argument is that while pornography can have negative health consequences for some individuals, it does not constitute a public health crisis as some have claimed. What is your opinion?
b. Rothman argues against the notion that pornography is a crisis by stating that it does not fulfill the public health field’s definition of a public health crisis. She points out that pornography use has increased steadily over time rather than spiking or reaching a tipping point; it does not lead directly or imminently to death, disease, property destruction, or population displacement; and it does not overwhelm local health systems. What do you think about these ideas?
c. Rothman’s approach is evidence-based, and she suggests that there may be negative health consequences for some people who use pornography, no substantial consequences for the majority, and even positive effects for some individuals, such as through safer sexual behaviors like solo masturbation. What do you think about these ideas?
Book review: Chose between the “Power of One” by Frances Haugen or “Pornography
Book review: Chose between the “Power of One” by Frances Haugen or “Pornography
Book review: Chose between the “Power of One” by Frances Haugen or “Pornography and Public Health” by Emily Rothman.
Book Review Assignment: The Power of One by Frances Haugen (750 words)
Haugen notes that for some of the teens devoted to Instagram, the peer pressure generated by the visually focused app led to mental health and body-image problems, and in some cases, eating disorders and suicidal thoughts, the research leaked by Haugen showed. One internal study cited 13.5% of teen girls saying Instagram makes thoughts of suicide worse and 17% of teen girls saying it makes eating disorders worse.
Big picture, here is what your review should include:
1. Provide an introduction to the review, including bibliographic information and an overview of the memoir’s central premise.
2. Demonstrate an understanding of the memoir’s themes, these may include topics such as: Facebook transparency, accountability in tech, and the impact of social media on society. Discusses these themes with specific references to Haugen’s experiences.
3. Provide a critical analysis of Haugen’s arguments and the broader implications for the tech industry and society.
4. Discusses the effectiveness of Haugen’s narrative in conveying her message.
5. Use multiple, detailed examples from the memoir to support the analysis of Haugen’s experiences and the issues raised.
6. Ask yourself: is this review well-written with no grammatical errors and a clear, coherent structure that enhances the analysis?
Was in the book an insightful exploration of the inner workings of Facebook and the broader tech industry?
Did Haugen provide a detailed account of her journey from a humble background to becoming a whistleblower, revealing the harmful effects of Facebook’s algorithms and lack of transparency
How about the idea of a broader wisdom and the personal experiences Haugen shares? Was she effective in conveying the importance of these personal experiences?
Was the book an approachable exploration of complex topics such as algorithms and the potential harm of Facebook’s technologies?
Is the book and her writing a good resource for understanding the issues surrounding social media and how they could realistically be mitigated?
On the negative side did Haugen’s personal grievances sometimes overshadow the larger issues at hand?
Could we view the book more generally as a treatise on truth, with Haugen encouraging other tech employees to stand up against dishonesty?
What did the book tell us about the lack of transparency and harmful algorithms? How effectively did Haugen highlight the dangers of algorithmic systems that prioritize profit over the well-being of users?
What about her journey from idealism to Whistleblowing: Did the book detail Haugen’s personal journey, from her initial belief in the positive potential of social media to her decision to become a whistleblower after she recognized the platforms’ darker aspects and the misuse of algorithms?
What about the role of personal experiences? What?Haugen’s formative experiences, including her academic background, personal challenges, and moral convictions, and how did they play a significant role in her decision to expose Facebook’s unethical practices?
Can we consider the book a commentary on the impact of tech on democracy and society? What do Haugen’s revelations underscore the negative effects of Facebook’s products on children, the stoking of division, tell us about the weakening of democracy?
Does she effectively make a call for employee empowerment and transparency? Does the memoir effectively serve as a call to action for tech employees to stand up against dishonesty and for companies to embrace transparency to avoid fearing their employees and losing top talent?
Are there insights into corporate responsibility? Can we view Haugen’s story as a testament to the importance of corporate responsibility, human communication, and democracy, as well as the potential for individuals to create significant change?
Finally, what about harm to children? Haugen has pointed out that Facebook’s products can harm children’s mental health. This includes the impact on teenage girls, where the platform’s content and interaction dynamics can exacerbate mental health issues.
What about corporate lying? She states: “The company intentionally hides vital information from the public, from the U.S. government and from governments around the world,” Haugen said in her testimony. “The documents I have provided to Congress prove that Facebook has repeatedly misled the public about what its own research reveals about the safety of children, the efficacy of its artificial intelligence systems and its role in spreading divisive and extreme messages.”
Emily Rothman’s book, Pornography and Public Health, provides a exploration of the complex relationship between pornography and public health issues.
Big picture, here is what your review should include:
A. Provide an introduction to the review, including bibliographic information and an overview of the memoir’s central premise.
B. Demonstrate an understanding of the book’s themes.
C. Provide a critical analysis of Rothman’s arguments and the broader implications for individuals and society.
D. Discusses the effectiveness of Rothman’s narrative in conveying her message.
E. Use multiple, detailed examples from the book to support Rothman’s analyses experiences and the issues raised.
F. Provide a summary: Does Emily Rothman’s Pornography and Public Health represent a significant contribution to the ongoing debate about the role of pornography in society? Is it a balanced and evidence-based perspective on a contentious topic? Is it an important read for anyone interested in the intersection of media, gender, and public health?
G. Ask yourself: Is this review well-written with no grammatical errors and a clear, coherent structure that enhances the analysis?
Please choose among (several) of the following questions to frame your review:
1. Does the book explore the positive and negative effects of pornography? What does the author hope to accomplish by considering pornography to be a public health crisis despite the lack of governmental support for this idea in the US?
2. Does Rothman provide a successful overview of pornography viewers, the content they are likely to encounter, and how this content has evolved over time?
3. Is the author successful in describing the impact of pornography on various aspects of human behavior and health, including aggression, body image, and compulsive use, while also acknowledging the potential benefits of porn literacy in certain contexts?
4. Rothman’s approach is evidence-based. Is she successful on drawing on research and data analysis?
5. Rothman aims to offer meaningful guidance for practice and policy. Is she successful in suggesting ways to minimize possible harms associated with pornography?
6. The book covers a range of subtopics within pornography scholarship. Is it a comprehensive resource for understanding one of the most complicated issues in health and human behavior today?
7. Rothman’s main argument is that while pornography may have various impacts on individuals, it should not be characterized as a public health crisis, and public health approaches should be evidence-based and nuanced, considering both potential harms and benefits of pornography use. What do you think about this argument?
8. She advocates for harm reduction goals, such as motivating people to use less extreme pornography and less frequently, and increasing pornography literacy, rather than trying to end all use. Are these important goals?
9. Additional points you may wish to address:
a. Rothman’s argument is that while pornography can have negative health consequences for some individuals, it does not constitute a public health crisis as some have claimed. What is your opinion?
b. Rothman argues against the notion that pornography is a crisis by stating that it does not fulfill the public health field’s definition of a public health crisis. She points out that pornography use has increased steadily over time rather than spiking or reaching a tipping point; it does not lead directly or imminently to death, disease, property destruction, or population displacement; and it does not overwhelm local health systems. What do you think about these ideas?
c. Rothman’s approach is evidence-based, and she suggests that there may be negative health consequences for some people who use pornography, no substantial consequences for the majority, and even positive effects for some individuals, such as through safer sexual behaviors like solo masturbation. What do you think about these ideas?
Look at the presentations on SlideShareLinks to an external site.. Find somethin
Look at the presentations on SlideShareLinks to an external site.. Find somethin
Look at the presentations on SlideShareLinks to an external site.. Find something uploaded within the last 30 days that interests you. You can use the search tool and filter for “last 30 days.”
Identify which presentation you have chosen and answer the following questions:
Identify three strengths of the presentation.
Identify three weaknesses.
Are there any elements of this presentation you might include in your presentation assignment due next week? Why or why not?
View Rubric
Please see the attached photos and ready the prompt and understand it clearly an
Please see the attached photos and ready the prompt and understand it clearly an
Please see the attached photos and ready the prompt and understand it clearly and we will discuss the rest in chat.
For your second assignment, you will collect quantitative data to conduct a co
For your second assignment, you will collect quantitative data to conduct a co
For your second assignment, you will collect quantitative data to conduct a conjoint analysis. I provide conceptual background for the conjoint analysis technique, in-depth instructions, and the evaluation rubric for your assignment in class. The attachments below are necessary to read for this assignment:
Conjoint Assignment Overview Download Conjoint Assignment Overview: provides step-by step instructions for your assignment and explains the components that will be used to evaluate your submission.
In-Depth Conjoint RecordingLinks to an external site.:
https://gauchocast.hosted.panopto.com/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=bc0217ac-f9d8-44fe-8435-b10d014ee9fc
provides a visual guide (by me) to explain how to conduct the statistical analysis required for this assignment, including running the regression analysis, computing partworths, and computing willingness to pay (WTP).
AND THERE IS ALSO AN EXAMPLE IN THE ATTACHMENT.
READING EVERYTHING IF U CAN, ESPECIALLY THE LECTURE PPT
Read the story from The NPR “Ads Slice Up Swing States With Growing Precision
Read the story from The NPR “Ads Slice Up Swing States With Growing Precision
Read the story from The NPR “Ads Slice Up Swing States With Growing PrecisionLinks to an external site.”, and the story “Colorado Springs Soaks In Triple The Political AdsLinks to an external site.”
Based on what you have learned from Chapter 10, discuss how the media planning is reflected in this case.
Your blog entry should be no less than 250 words and no more than 300 words.
Make sure you spell check your work for grammatical errors and typos.
Link to Ads Slice Up
https://www.npr.org/2012/09/24/161616073/ads-slice-up-swing-states-with-growing-precision
Link to Colorado Springs
https://www.npr.org/2012/09/24/161687256/colorado-springs-soaks-in-triple-the-political-ads