Login information to the student's portal will be shared with the assigned write

Login information to the student’s portal will be shared with the assigned writer.
Instructions
Download and use the Summary Report Template [DOCX] Download Summary Report Template [DOCX]. You will complete this assessment by replacing all italicized instructional text with your own words.
Executive Summary
Overview
State your proposal’s big idea in the Overview.
Explain the information you plan to collect and the reasons why it is important to collect it.
Describe how this information could validate the quality of care delivered by your facility.
Note: Your Overview needs to be shorter than the Introduction from your proposal. Remember the entire narrative portion of your Summary Report needs to be less than two pages. You will have an additional page for your Gantt chart.
Key Study Components
Include a subheading labeled, Data Collection Plan.
Distill down into 1–2 sentences the most important information about your implementation plan and the information you plan to collect at your facility.
Include a subheading labeled, Data Security Plan.
Highlight in 1–2 sentences the most important information about your plan to ensure data security that your senior leaders need to know.
Include a subheading labeled, Benchmarking Plan.
Provide a 1–2-sentence overview about the best practices (benchmarks that will be used) and procedures your study will use to ensure the data you collect meets standards for interoperability with an HIE.
Include a subheading labeled, Quality and Change Management Strategies.
Summarize in 1–2 sentences how your plan incorporates quality and change management strategies.
Conclusion
State how your proposed study will improve the quality of patient care delivered by your physician group. You Conclusion needs to be one paragraph of no more than five or six sentences.
Reference
List one reference in APA format to benefit your senior leaders.
Gantt Chart
Include with your Summary Report a one-page Gantt chart that specifies the major steps in your implementation plan and the time frame associated with each step. Microsoft Excel is one tool you can use to create your chart. Your suggested readings supply additional information about how to create a Gantt chart in Excel. Please feel free to use other tools. The only requirement is that your Gantt chart specify the major steps in your implementation plan and the time frame associated with each step.
Additional Requirements
Written communication: Your summary report must be concise, clear and well organized, with correct spelling, grammar, and syntax, to support orderly exposition of content. Use the Summary Report Template [DOCX] Download Summary Report Template [DOCX].
Assessment Title: You may devise your own title of 5–15 words for the summary report or use Summary Report – Health Care Information Review. Enter the other required information specified on the div.
References: Specify one peer-reviewed reference that will benefit your senior leaders in the appropriate space on your div. Your reference should conform to APA formatting.
Length: 1–2 typed, single-spaced pages. The narrative portion of your summary report should be preferably one page; it should not exceed two pages. You will have an additional page containing your Gantt chart.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Determine stages of the information lifecycle embedded within health information management technology functions.
Create a Gantt chart detailing the steps and time frames for study implementation.
Competency 2: Apply laws governing health information confidentiality, privacy, and security.
Describe how the plan will implement data security measures.
Competency 3: Assess system applications used to operationalize health information.
Explain rationale for proposed health care information review study.
Specify what information will be collected and from which applications.
Summarize how the proposed study will improve the quality of care delivered by the physician group.
Competency 4: Determine how a health information exchange (HIE) or other external health care databases affect the management of patient data, clinical knowledge, and population data.
Design evidence-based best practices to ensure data meet interoperability standards with an HIE.
Competency 5: Apply quality and change management concepts to health care information management.
Incorporate evidence-based quality and change management strategies.
Competency 6: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, and is consistent with the expectations for health care professionals.
Write clearly, with correct spelling, grammar, and syntax, and good organization.
Apply proper APA formatting and style to citations and references.
[u09a1] Week 9 Assignment 1: Summary Report – Health Care Information Review
[u09a1] Week 9 Assignment 1: Summary Report – Health Care Information Review
Criteria Ratings Pts
Explain rationale for proposed health care information review study.
view longer description
24 to >20.4 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Succinctly explains the rationale for proposed health care information review study, focusing only on critical points senior leaders need to know.
20.4 to >16.8 pts
PROFICIENT
Explains rationale for proposed health care information review study.
16.8 to >0 pts
BASIC
Explains the rationale for proposed health care information review study, but explanation does not highlight most critical points or is not succinct.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not explain rationale for proposed health care information review study.
0 / 24 pts
Specify what information will be collected and from which applications.
view longer description
24 to >20.4 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Provides a high-level overview of an effective data collection plan, including human resources and system requirements.
20.4 to >16.8 pts
PROFICIENT
Specifies what information will be collected and from which applications.
16.8 to >0 pts
BASIC
Specifies what information will be collected and from which applications but key elements are missing and/or inaccurate.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not specify what information will be collected and from which applications.
0 / 24 pts
Describe how the plan will implement data security measures.
view longer description
24 to >20.4 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Provides a high-level overview of an effective, achievable, and comprehensive data security plan.
20.4 to >16.8 pts
PROFICIENT
Describes how the plan will implement data security measures.
16.8 to >0 pts
BASIC
Describes how the plan will implement data security measures but description is missing critical elements or is inaccurate.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not describe how the plan will implement data security measures.
0 / 24 pts
Design evidence-based best practices to ensure data meet interoperability standards with an HIE.
view longer description
24 to >20.4 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Provides a high-level overview of the clear, comprehensive, and evidence-based best practices that will be employed to ensure data meet interoperability standards with an HIE.
20.4 to >16.8 pts
PROFICIENT
Designs evidence-based best practices to ensure data meet interoperability standards with an HIE.
16.8 to >0 pts
BASIC
Designs practices to ensure data meet interoperability standards with an HIE but practices are not always evidence based or appropriately applied to proposed study.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not design evidence-based best practices to ensure data meet interoperability standards with an HIE.
0 / 24 pts
Incorporate evidence-based quality and change management strategies.
view longer description
24 to >20.4 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Provides a high-level overview of the most effective evidence-based quality and change management strategies to be employed in the proposed study.
20.4 to >16.8 pts
PROFICIENT
Incorporates evidence-based quality and change management strategies.
16.8 to >0 pts
BASIC
Incorporates quality and change management strategies, but strategies are not always evidence-based or appropriately applied to proposed study.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not incorporate evidence-based quality and change management strategies.
0 / 24 pts
Create a Gantt chart detailing the steps and time frames for study implementation.
view longer description
30 to >25.5 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Creates an effective Gantt chart detailing achievable steps and time frames for study implementation. Gantt chart also incorporates plans to mitigate risks.
25.5 to >21 pts
PROFICIENT
Creates a Gantt chart detailing the steps and time frames for study implementation.
21 to >0 pts
BASIC
Creates a Gantt chart detailing the steps and time frames for study implementation but key steps and time frames are missing or inaccurate.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not create a Gantt chart detailing the steps and time frames for study implementation.
0 / 30 pts
Summarize how the proposed study will improve the quality of care delivered by the physician group.
view longer description
30 to >25.5 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Provides a persuasive, high-level overview of how the proposed study will improve the quality of care delivered by the physician group.
25.5 to >21 pts
PROFICIENT
Summarizes how the proposed study will improve the quality of care delivered by the physician group.
21 to >0 pts
BASIC
Summarizes how the proposed study will improve the quality of care delivered by the physician group, but includes extraneous information and/or fails to cover critical elements.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not summarize how the proposed study will improve the quality of care delivered by the physician group.
0 / 30 pts
Write clearly, with correct spelling, grammar, and syntax, and good organization.
view longer description
10 to >8.5 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Writes succinctly with excellent clarity and organization, with no errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax. Employs critical or analytical reasoning in selecting information to be included in executive summary.
8.5 to >7 pts
PROFICIENT
Writes clearly, with correct spelling, grammar, and syntax, and good organization.
7 to >0 pts
BASIC
Writes clearly overall, but some errors exist in spelling, grammar, syntax, or organization. Summary sometimes contains extraneous information or fails to highlight information most critical to senior leaders.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not write clearly, and errors in spelling, grammar, syntax, and good organization exist.
0 / 10 pts
Apply proper APA formatting and style to citations and references.
view longer description
10 to >8.5 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Consistently applies proper APA formatting and style to references and citations without errors.
8.5 to >7 pts
PROFICIENT
Applies proper APA formatting and style to citations and references.
7 to >0 pts
BASIC
Applies APA formatting and style to references and citations inconsistently and with significant errors.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not apply proper APA formatting and style to citations and references.
0 / 10 pts