ZIP FILE https://we.tl/t-g4QvmVfVJz Thus far, we have exclusively been working w

ZIP FILE https://we.tl/t-g4QvmVfVJz
Thus far, we have exclusively been working w

ZIP FILE https://we.tl/t-g4QvmVfVJz
Thus far, we have exclusively been working with vector data. In Module 5, you also learned about raster data models. In this lab, we will explore how we use raster data in a GIS, and how we layer different types of data on top of one another to produce a map. Additionally, we will take a closer look at map elements and the design choices that go into them.
In Module 5, we also discussed map analysis. In this lab, you will have the chance to analyze each other’s’ maps and learn from the analyses your peers do of your map.
As we build those skills, we will also be exploring a real-world geographic question:
How is climate change distributed across the US?
In the lab, we will consider how average temperature is changing and where we see particularly pronounced temperature increases and decreases.
The mapping component of this lab should take approximately 2 hours to complete. The map analysis component of this lab should take approximately 1 hour to complete. This lab is worth 60 points.
Evidence of skill development will be assessed on:
Submit one map made using QGIS. (Required – 30 points)
Once you have submitted your map, you are asked to analyze the maps of two of your self-chosen peers. For each map, please consider the map and draft a 150-300 word response that answers the following questions:
What is the argument of this map?
How can you tell?
What map elements/components support the argument?
What doesn’t support the argument? Why?
NOTE: Please try to comment on maps that have not yet been commented on or maps that have fewer comments. Piling up and homogenizing comments can lead to a loss in post-reviewer scores. The deadline for peer reviews is Feb. 8th, 5 pm (two days after the due of the lab 5 map).