Assessment Descriiption
The purpose of this assignment is to conduct a comparis
Assessment Descriiption
The purpose of this assignment is to conduct a comparison on different research designs to better understand their design and application. Understanding the different types of research design is important so that nurses can effectively apply evidence-based research into practice to address issues and offer better patient care.
You will utilize your approved nursing practice problem to complete the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments for this course and NUR-590, during which you will synthesize all of the sections into a final written paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.
Review feedback from your instructor on the Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Identification of Nursing Practice Problem assignment submitted in Topic 1. If your original proposed nursing problem was outside the scope of nursing practice or not conducive to an evidence-based practice project proposal, work with your instructor to identify a new topic prior to beginning this assignment. If your proposed topic requires revision, complete this prior to beginning this assignment.
Conduct a literature search on your approved nursing practice problem. Select one qualitative translational research article and one quantitative translational research article for this assignment. Using the “Translational Research Graphic Organizer,” present your proposed topic and complete the tables.
Refer to “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview,” located in Class Resources, for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.
You are required to cite two peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion
https://halo.gcu.edu/resource/c34f73f3-c3af-4728-b22a-9fea72b6d472
Rubic Descriiption
Nursing Practice Problem (Revision)
5. Target
10 points
The nursing practice problem is clearly presented and approved. No revision was required, or all necessary revisions are were made.
4. Acceptable
9.2 points
NA
3. Approaching
8.8 points
Revisions were made accordingly to improve the proposed nursing practice problem, but some aspects are inaccurate or unclear. Additional revisions are still required for approval.
2. Insufficient
8 points
The changes failed to meet the criteria for a relevant nursing practice problem for an evidence-based practice project proposal. Additional revisions are still required for approval.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The nursing practice problem was not included, or the required revisions were not made.
Qualitative Article
10 points
Criteria Descriiption
5. Target
10 points
A qualitative translational research article is listed. The article is peer-reviewed, published within the last five years, and pertains to the nursing practice problem. The assignment criteria are fully met.
4. Acceptable
9.2 points
N/A
3. Approaching
8.8 points
Overall, the qualitative translational research article generally supports the proposed nursing practice problem. The proposed problem would be better supported with a different article.
2. Insufficient
8 points
N/A
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The qualitative translational research article is omitted.
Methodology of Qualitative Article
10 points
Criteria Descriiption
5. Target
10 points
The summary of methodology in the qualitative translational research article is thorough and accurate. A clear understanding of methodologies is evident.
4. Acceptable
9.2 points
The summary of the methodology in the qualitative translational research article is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity.
3. Approaching
8.8 points
The summary of the methodology in the qualitative translational research article is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear.
2. Insufficient
8 points
The summary of the methodology in the qualitative translational research article is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The summary of the methodology in the qualitative translational research article is omitted.
Qualitative Article Research Goals
10 points
Criteria Descriiption
5. Target
10 points
The summary of research goals in the qualitative translational research article is thorough and accurate. A clear understanding of research goals is evident.
4. Acceptable
9.2 points
The summary of research goals in the qualitative translational research article is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity.
3. Approaching
8.8 points
The summary of research goals in the qualitative translational research article is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear.
2. Insufficient
8 points
The summary of research goals in the qualitative translational research article is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The summary of research goals in the qualitative translational research article is omitted.
Qualitative Article Data Collection
10 points
Criteria Descriiption
5. Target
10 points
The summary of data collection in the qualitative translational research article is thorough and accurate. A clear understanding of data collection is evident.
4. Acceptable
9.2 points
The summary of data collection in the qualitative translational research article is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity.
3. Approaching
8.8 points
The summary of data collection in the qualitative translational research article is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear.
2. Insufficient
8 points
The summary of data collection in the qualitative translational research article is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The summary of data collection in the qualitative translational research article is omitted.
Quantitative Article
10 points
Criteria Descriiption
5. Target
10 points
A quantitative translational research article is listed. The article is peer-reviewed, published within the last five years, and pertains to the nursing practice problem. The assignment criteria are fully met.
4. Acceptable
9.2 points
N/A
3. Approaching
8.8 points
Overall, the quantitative translational research article generally supports the proposed nursing practice problem. The proposed problem would be better supported with a different article.
2. Insufficient
8 points
N/A
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The quantitative translational research article is omitted.
Methodology of Quantitative Article
10 points
Criteria Descriiption
5. Target
10 points
The summary of methodology in the quantitative translational research article is thorough and accurate. A clear understanding of methodologies is evident.
4. Acceptable
9.2 points
The summary of the methodology in the quantitative translational research article is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity.
3. Approaching
8.8 points
The summary of the methodology in the quantitative translational research article is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear.
2. Insufficient
8 points
The summary of the methodology in the quantitative translational research article is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The summary of the methodology in the quantitative translational research article is omitted.
Quantitative Article Research Goals
10 points
Criteria Descriiption
5. Target
10 points
The summary of research goals in the quantitative translational research article is thorough and accurate. A clear understanding of research goals is evident.
4. Acceptable
9.2 points
The summary of research goals in the quantitative translational research article is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity.
3. Approaching
8.8 points
The summary of research goals in the quantitative translational research article is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear.
2. Insufficient
8 points
The summary of research goals in the quantitative translational research article is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The summary of research goals in the quantitative translational research article is omitted.
Quantitative Article Data Collection
10 points
Criteria Descriiption
5. Target
10 points
The summary of data collection in the quantitative translational research article is thorough and accurate. A clear understanding of data collection is evident.
4. Acceptable
9.2 points
The summary of data collection in the quantitative translational research article is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity.
3. Approaching
8.8 points
The summary of data collection in the quantitative translational research article is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear.
2. Insufficient
8 points
The summary of data collection in the quantitative translational research article is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The summary of data collection in the quantitative translational research article is omitted.
Mechanics of Writing
5 points
Criteria Descriiption
(Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.)
5. Target
5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable
4.6 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3. Approaching
4.4 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient
4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
Format/Documentation
5 points
Criteria Descriiption
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target
5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Acceptable
4.6 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching
4.4 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
2. Insufficient
4 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total
100 points
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.