Part 1 Case study: 2 pages minimum No references are required. Research Patagoni

Part 1 Case study: 2 pages minimum No references are required.
Research Patagoni

Part 1 Case study: 2 pages minimum No references are required.
Research Patagonia, answer the following questions, and be sure to cite your sources:
1. How has Patagonia been able to promote corporate social responsibility among other businesses?
2. Do you think it is beneficial for Patagonia to branch out into ventures other than apparel?
3. Does Patagonia—a privately held, debt-free company—have an advantage over public companies with shareholders by being socially responsible?
Part 2 Journal Article:
Pick one of the following terms for your research:
ethical awareness
moral intensity
locus of control
corporate culture
veil of ignorance
select one of the key terms presented and conduct a search of Campbellsville University’s online Library resources to find 1 recent peer-reviewed academic journal article (within the past 3 years) that closely relates to the concept. Your submission must include the following information in the following format:
DEFINITION: a brief definition of the key term followed by the APA reference for the term; this does not count in the word requirement.
SUMMARY: Summarize the article in your own words- this should be in the 150-200 word range. Please provide the key takeaways from the article.
DISCUSSION: Using 300-350 words, write a brief discussion, in your own words of how the article relates to the selected chapter Key Term. A discussion is not rehashing what was already stated in the article, but the opportunity for you to add value by sharing your experiences, thoughts and opinions. This is the most important part of the assignment.
REFERENCES: All references must be listed at the bottom of the submission–in APA format.
Be sure to use the headers in your submission to ensure that all aspects of the assignment are completed as required (i.e., Definition, Article Summary, Discussion, Referemces).
Part 3 Discussion: Respond to the following: 100 word minimum No references are required.
Principles and values are both fundamental components of ethical decision making, but they differ in their nature and application (Suri et al., 2019). Understanding their similarities and differences is crucial for comprehending how they guide behavior and decision-making processes.
Similarities:
Guidance for Behavior: Both principles and values serve as guidelines for behavior. They help individuals determine what is right and wrong, shaping their actions and decisions.
Foundation for Ethics: Principles and values form the foundation of ethical frameworks. They underpin the rules and standards by which people and organizations operate.
Influence on Decisions: Both play a critical role in influencing decisions (Shahsavarani & Abadi, 2015). Ethical decisions are often evaluated based on adherence to certain principles and alignment with personal or societal values.
Differences:
Nature and Definition:
Principles: Principles are fundamental truths or propositions that serve as the foundation for a system of belief or behavior. They are universal and objective, often codified in laws or ethical codes. Examples include justice, autonomy, and non-maleficence.
Values: Values are deeply held beliefs about what is important or desirable. They are subjective and personal, varying greatly among individuals and cultures. Examples include honesty, loyalty, and compassion (Shahsavarani & Abadi, 2015).
Scope and Flexibility:
Principles: Principles are broad and overarching, providing a general framework for ethical behavior. They are relatively stable and less likely to change over time.
Values: Values are more specific and can be more flexible. They can evolve with experiences and changes in personal or societal contexts.
Application:
Principles: Principles often dictate specific actions or prohibitions (e.g., “do not harm”). They are used to resolve ethical dilemmas by providing clear rules.
Values: Values guide choices and priorities, influencing how principles are interpreted and applied. They shape the motivations behind actions (e.g., valuing honesty may influence one to always speak the truth).
Importance in Ethical Decision Making:
Principles and values are critical in ethical decision making because they provide a framework for evaluating actions and making judgments. Principles offer a consistent standard against which actions can be measured, ensuring that decisions align with established ethical norms and laws. This consistency helps maintain integrity and accountability in both personal and professional contexts (Suri et al., 2019). Values bring a personal dimension to ethical decision making. They reflect what individuals or organizations consider important, shaping their goals and aspirations. Values motivate ethical behavior by aligning actions with what is personally meaningful and culturally significant.