Topic: The Impact of Telehealth Services on Chronic Disease Management Among Eld
Topic: The Impact of Telehealth Services on Chronic Disease Management Among Elderly Patients Writing a (critique of a quantitative research study in NURS 321) involves a detailed and structured analysis of a chosen study, following specific guidelines and critiquing criteria. Here’s a breakdown to help guide you through this process: prompts.Examples of libraries or websites that use can use:
PubMed
CINHAL
Medline – Advanced Search
Using MeSH for More Targeted PubMed Searching
### 1. *Introduction*
– *Cite the Study:*. Begin by citing the research study you’ve chosen in APA 7th edition format. This citation should appear in the reference list and be referred to within the text.
– *Describe the Search Description:* Detail your search process, including inclusion and exclusion criteria, key words used, and databases searched. This provides context on how you identified the study.
– *Purpose of the Research Study:* Summarize the author’s described purpose for conducting the research, indicating its relevance and significance.
### 2. *Body—Critique Questions*
Organize this section with individual APA headings for each question. Provide a rationale for your critique, supporting your analysis with evidence.
– *Research Design:* Identify whether the study is experimental, quasi-experimental, or nonexperimental. Discuss the suitability of the chosen design for the study’s objectives.
– *Appropriateness of Design:* Evaluate whether the research design effectively addresses the study’s purpose.
– *Application of Randomization, Control, and Manipulation:* Examine how these elements are used to ensure the study’s validity.
– *Protection of Human Subjects:* Discuss the ethical considerations and how participants’ rights and well-being were safeguarded.
– *Statistical Analysis Used:* Identify and critique the statistical methods applied in the study.
– *Appropriateness of Statistical Tests:* Assess whether the chosen statistical tests were suitable for the data and research questions.
– *Sample Selection:* Evaluate the process used for selecting participants and its impact on the study’s validity.
– *Internal and External Validity:* Analyze how the study addresses potential threats to validity.
– *Study Limitations:* Critically examine any limitations acknowledged by the authors and any you perceive.
– *Alternative Explanations:* Consider other interpretations of the findings.
– *Generalizability:* Discuss the extent to which the findings can be applied to the broader population.
### 3. *Conclusion*
– *Changes in Practice:* Suggest any changes in nursing or healthcare practice based on the study’s findings.
– *Further Research:* Recommend areas for future research to explore or build upon these findings.
– *Barriers to Implementation:* Identify potential obstacles to applying the study’s recommendations in practice.
– *Interprofessional Teams:* Discuss how interprofessional collaboration could facilitate improvements based on the study’s evidence.
### 4. *References*
– Provide a comprehensive list of all references cited in your paper, formatted according to APA 7th edition guidelines. This should include a variety of scholarly sources, preferably within the last 5 years.
### *NURS 321 Critique of Research Study Rubric*
– *Content Knowledge:* Demonstrate a thorough understanding of the topic and exceed in presenting known information comprehensively.
– *Flow of Content:* Ensure the paper is well-organized, with a logical and engaging flow of information.
– *Clarity, Critical Thinking:* Offer concise explanations, analyze information deeply, and provide insightful conclusions.
– *Writing Composition:* Maintain high standards of spelling, grammar, and sentence structure, with minimal errors.
– *References:* Utilize a variety of scholarly sources, focusing on recent literature to support your critique.
– *APA Format:* Adhere strictly to APA formatting rules, with minimal errors in the text and reference list.
Approach each section and criterion with a critical eye and a focus on scholarly writing to achieve a comprehensive and insightful critique.